Samsung Galaxy A3
Laptopspecificaties

Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 16 score (van 23 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Samsung Galaxy A3
A small metal gadget. Samsung uses a slim metal casing for its Galaxy A lineup and had really impressed us with the Galaxy A5, even though the voice quality was not that good. In this report we will see why the Galaxy A3 is good, but not a bargain.
Bron: Tech Advisor
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionSamsung’s RRP is £239, but you can buy the Galaxy A3 SIM-free for around £190 if you search around online. If you do want it on contract, there should be no up-front cost. But as we’ve said, it’s possible to get a phone with similar specifications for a lot less, so it’s hard to justify spending the extra on the A3 for its cameras or even Samsung’s software.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 21-07-2015
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60% prijs: 60% prestatie: 70% functionaliteiten: 60% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Trusted Reviews
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe A3 is a attractive-looking £250 smartphone, but like many of Samsung's cheap phones it doesn't really break the mould. For the same amount of money or less, you can get a better screen and a more streamlined Android experience. If it was £100 cheaper then I could be a little more forgiving about some of the compromises.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 12-05-2015
Bron: Expert Reviews
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThere's certainly a lot to like about the Galaxy A3 and it's great to see Samsung introducing more of its top-end features further down the range. As you'd expect, a full metal unibody doesn't come cheap, as the Galaxy A3 is currently on sale in the UK for £230 SIM-free or free on a £18-per-month contract, putting it firmly in mid-range smartphone territory.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 03-03-2015
Bron: Recombu
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Galaxy Alpha got things started, but the A Series shows that Samsung is now well and truly into its stride. Bringing premium metal design work down to humble mid-rangers like the Samsung Galaxy A3 helps the company standout and should up their reputation for the target buyers.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 24-02-2015
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Laptop Media
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionSamsung has definately put some more effort into making the Galaxy A3 and it’s nice for a change to see that the comapny has finally started using metal in their design. The device isn’t entirely made out of aluminum, but still features a good plastic non-removable back cover. It is quite different from most of the material used in recent Galaxy devices and we liked the finish used too.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 24-02-2015
Bron: Android Authority
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Galaxy A3 isn’t available in the US from any network operator, but can be picked up from Amazon for $320. This is quite steep for a device with such specifications, especially when you consider the slew of budget-friendly options available that offer a similar experience, and sometimes better, if you can manage to get yourself an invite for the OnePlus One.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 01-02-2015
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85%
Bron: GSM Arena
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionIt's hard not to like the Samsung Galaxy A3. And there's more to like about it than what is on the outside. Even so, let's take one final moment to appreciate Samsung's creation. They crafted a 6.9mm thick smartphone with an aluminum frame and targeted it straight at the mid-range market. It's also very compact and comfortably pocketable.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 23-01-2015
Bron: Under KG
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionvideo review
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 12-01-2015
Bron: Chip.de
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 27-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 68% prijs: 85% prestatie: 78% functionaliteiten: 52% beeldscherm: 81% mobiliteit: 65%
Bron: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 7/2015

Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-06-2015
Beoordeling: Totale score: 87%
Bron: Tom's Hardware
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 06-05-2015
Bron: Notebookinfo
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 13-03-2015
Beoordeling: Totale score: 91% prestatie: 85% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 95% afwerking: 100% ergonomie: 95% emissies: 95%
Bron: Allround-PC.com
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionVergelijking, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 04-03-2015
Bron: Computerbild - Heft 5/2015

Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 16-02-2015
Beoordeling: Totale score: 84%
Bron: Mobicroco
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 14-02-2015
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90% functionaliteiten: 83% afwerking: 95% ergonomie: 87%
Bron: Netzwelt
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 12-02-2015
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% functionaliteiten: 70% mobiliteit: 50% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Mobicroco
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 06-02-2015
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90% functionaliteiten: 80% afwerking: 95% ergonomie: 87%
Bron: Inside Handy
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-02-2015
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Connect - Heft 3/2015

Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-02-2015
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: e-media - Heft 4/2015

Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 16-01-2015
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Android Pit - Heft 2/2015

Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-01-2015
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: 01Net
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 20-03-2015
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Commentaar
Qualcomm Adreno 306:
Deze grafische kaarten voor notebooks zijn niet bruikbaar voor games. Als ze al games kunnen draaien, dan doen ze dat met grafische afwijkingen en heel lage framesnelheid. Voor gamers zijn deze chips ongeschikt! Kantoor en internet taken zijn, daarentegen, geen probleem voor deze GPUs.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
410 MSM8916: 
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.






