Kort testrapport van Acer Swift 3 SF313 met Ice Lake Processor
Evaluatie | Datum | Model | Gewicht | Hoogte | Formaat | Resolutie | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87 % | 02-2020 | Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 16.6 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 | |
88 % | 10-2019 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.4 kg | 14.95 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
86 % | 02-2019 | Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
88 % | 02-2019 | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 11.6 mm | 13.30" | 3840x2160 | |
86 % | 07-2019 | Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
85 % | 08-2019 | HP Envy 13-aq0003ng i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | 1.2 kg | 14.7 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 |
Top 10 Testrapporten
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Gaming Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000De beste notebookbeeldschermen zoals getest door Notebookcheck
» De beste notebookbeeldschermen
» Top Windows Alternatieven voor de MacBook Pro 13
» Top Windows Alternatieven voor de MacBook Pro 15
» Top Windows alternatieven voor de MacBook 12 en Air
» Top 10 best verkopende notebooks op Amazon
» Top 10 Convertible Notebooks
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets tot € 250
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Phablets (>90cm²)
» Top 10 Camera Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €500
» Top 10 best verkopende smartphones op Amazon
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (30.9 - 2374, n=198) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
HP Envy 13-aq0003ng | |
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (36 - 2371, n=198) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
HP Envy 13-aq0003ng | |
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 |
|
Helderheidsverdeling: 82 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 466 cd/m²
Contrast: 1634:1 (Zwart: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.38 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 2.69
ΔE Greyscale 3.75 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.37
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 BOE, NE135FBM-N41, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.50 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL LP140WF9-SPE2, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ BOE NV133FHM-N62, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 ID: AUO 282B B133ZAN Dell: 90NTH, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.30 | Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE N133HCE-EN2, a-Si IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.30 | HP Envy 13-aq0003ng InfoVision M133NVF3 R2, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 7% | 48% | -11% | 3984% | 630% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 55 (25, 30) | 49.6 (23.6, 26) 10% | 44 (22, 22) 20% | 58 (26, 32) -5% | 40.4 (22, 18.4) 27% | 31 (15, 16) 44% |
Response Time Black / White * | 31 (17, 14) | 30 (16.4, 13.6) 3% | 36 (21, 15) -16% | 36 (20, 16) -16% | 28.8 (15.6, 13.2) 7% | 24 (14, 10) 23% |
PWM Frequency | 208 (90) | 500 (90) 140% | 25000 (20) 11919% | 4000 (90) 1823% | ||
Screen | 4% | -40% | -16% | -1% | 0% | |
Brightness middle | 474 | 384 -19% | 300 -37% | 404 -15% | 319 -33% | 768 62% |
Brightness | 426 | 363 -15% | 277 -35% | 389 -9% | 309 -27% | 778 83% |
Brightness Distribution | 82 | 90 10% | 87 6% | 85 4% | 92 12% | 82 0% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.17 41% | 0.26 10% | 0.37 -28% | 0.28 3% | 0.48 -66% |
Contrast | 1634 | 2259 38% | 1154 -29% | 1092 -33% | 1139 -30% | 1600 -2% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 2.38 | 3.5 -47% | 5.96 -150% | 3.72 -56% | 2.4 -1% | 3.49 -47% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 5.88 | 5.5 6% | 10.6 -80% | 7.38 -26% | 6.3 -7% | 7.41 -26% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 2.69 | 1 63% | 2.47 8% | 2.06 23% | 0.6 78% | 2.07 23% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 3.75 | 4.6 -23% | 7.64 -104% | 4.44 -18% | 3.8 -1% | 4.09 -9% |
Gamma | 2.37 93% | 2.32 95% | 2.44 90% | 2.34 94% | 2.16 102% | 2.54 87% |
CCT | 6466 101% | 6884 94% | 6877 95% | 7095 92% | 7335 89% | 6452 101% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65 | 62 -5% | 57 -12% | 60 -8% | 63.5 -2% | 60 -8% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 97.7 -2% | 88 -12% | 93 -7% | 99.1 -1% | 92 -8% |
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen) | 6% /
5% | 4% /
-21% | -14% /
-15% | 1992% /
853% | 315% /
135% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Responstijd Scherm
↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit | ||
---|---|---|
31 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 17 ms stijging | |
↘ 14 ms daling | ||
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (24.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. | ||
↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs | ||
55 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 25 ms stijging | |
↘ 30 ms daling | ||
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (38.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen | 208 Hz | ≤ 90 % helderheid instelling | |
Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 208 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 90 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden. De frequentie van 208 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager). Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9700 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (141 - 190, n=32) | |
HP Envy 13-aq0003ng | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Average of class Subnotebook (20 - 221, n=349) | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (288 - 836, n=33) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
HP Envy 13-aq0003ng | |
Average of class Subnotebook (32 - 1674, n=364) |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2.09 - 2.17, n=4) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.09 - 2.49, n=288) | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (5.69 - 9.37, n=4) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.33 - 16.1, n=427) |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (358 - 474, n=28) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (73 - 583, n=88) | |
HP Envy 13-aq0003ng | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (1081 - 2024, n=28) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (110 - 3839, n=89) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE | |
HP Envy 13-aq0003ng |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (205 - 273, n=16) | |
HP Envy 13-aq0003ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (34.8 - 403, n=177) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (25166 - 53081, n=17) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
HP Envy 13-aq0003ng | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE | |
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3963 - 62227, n=185) | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Subnotebook (489 - 30250, n=233) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE | |
HP Envy 13-aq0003ng | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (788 - 1249, n=26) |
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4.2 - 6277, n=78) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (675 - 1650, n=20) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL |
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 | |
Pass 2 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (40.6 - 49.5, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1.96 - 79.9, n=122) | |
Pass 1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (176 - 194, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11.6 - 202, n=123) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.63 - 11, n=73) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2.2 - 6.38, n=19) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ |
wPrime 2.10 | |
1024m | |
Average of class Subnotebook (109 - 4608, n=302) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (233 - 354, n=3) | |
32m | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3.95 - 174, n=303) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (6.97 - 9.19, n=3) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ |
Geekbench 5.0 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (3375 - 4839, n=5) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (293 - 6811, n=35) | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (1184 - 1334, n=5) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (260 - 1587, n=35) |
Geekbench 5.3 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2464 - 4855, n=16) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (591 - 7590, n=74) | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (948 - 1348, n=16) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (310 - 1740, n=74) |
* ... kleiner is beter
PCMark 8 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
HP Envy 13-aq0003ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (2460 - 5291, n=17) | |
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1283 - 5628, n=266) | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (3305 - 4275, n=17) | |
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE | |
HP Envy 13-aq0003ng | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1027 - 4410, n=297) |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3759 punten | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5979 punten | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4802 punten | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3975 punten | |
Help |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A | HP Envy 13-aq0003ng Toshiba KBG30ZMV512G | Average Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 8% | -7% | -36% | -34% | -42% | -11% | |
Write 4K | 187.4 | 128.4 -31% | 113.7 -39% | 84.57 -55% | 89.33 -52% | 106.2 -43% | 144 (103 - 214, n=17) -23% |
Read 4K | 63.8 | 46.37 -27% | 40.6 -36% | 38.52 -40% | 37.4 -41% | 44.89 -30% | 54.1 (49.8 - 63.8, n=17) -15% |
Write Seq | 1776 | 1863 5% | 844.5 -52% | 556.7 -69% | 608.2 -66% | 638.7 -64% | 1445 (1264 - 1776, n=16) -19% |
Read Seq | 1693 | 2340 38% | 1137 -33% | 1393 -18% | 1019 -40% | 849.1 -50% | 1446 (1410 - 1693, n=16) -15% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 492.3 | 451.1 -8% | 867.7 76% | 339.5 -31% | 487.9 -1% | 217.4 -56% | 427 (402 - 644, n=17) -13% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 539.4 | 415.3 -23% | 1579.9 193% | 255.4 -53% | 284.8 -47% | 322.1 -40% | 456 (329 - 600, n=17) -15% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1769.9 | 2985 69% | 345.6 -80% | 557.6 -68% | 872.1 -51% | 864.9 -51% | 1650 (1733 - 1802, n=17) -7% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 1715 | 2565 50% | 411.7 -76% | 2541 48% | 1635 -5% | 1630 -5% | 1728 (1616 - 1970, n=17) 1% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 899.2 | 451.4 -50% | 646.7 -28% | 387.3 -57% | 880 (860 - 899, n=2) -2% | ||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 630 | 1004.4 59% | 684.7 9% | 756.6 20% | 629 (628 - 630, n=2) 0% | ||
AS SSD | 35% | -26% | -33% | -18% | -72% | -14% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 819.74 | 1278.47 56% | 478.45 -42% | 617.61 -25% | 374.15 -54% | 452.69 -45% | 997 (571 - 1411, n=14) 22% |
Copy Program MB/s | 480.42 | 541.73 13% | 315.19 -34% | 287.93 -40% | 292.16 -39% | 277.65 -42% | 484 (310 - 600, n=14) 1% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1400.88 | 2015.93 44% | 585.97 -58% | 893.32 -36% | 943.09 -33% | 593.39 -58% | 1469 (836 - 1736, n=14) 5% |
Score Total | 2313 | 3670 59% | 2163 -6% | 1479 -36% | 2234 -3% | 1607 -31% | 2252 (1990 - 2421, n=16) -3% |
Score Write | 1085 | 1721 59% | 789 -27% | 471 -57% | 843 -22% | 450 -59% | 1060 (820 - 1182, n=16) -2% |
Score Read | 811 | 1322 63% | 921 14% | 704 -13% | 939 16% | 779 -4% | 780 (730 - 819, n=16) -4% |
Access Time Write * | 0.038 | 0.029 24% | 0.045 -18% | 0.051 -34% | 0.031 18% | 0.168 -342% | 0.0773 (0.038 - 0.128, n=16) -103% |
Access Time Read * | 0.044 | 0.052 -18% | 0.074 -68% | 0.061 -39% | 0.046 -5% | 0.147 -234% | 0.0724 (0.036 - 0.165, n=14) -65% |
4K-64 Write | 783.07 | 1461.29 87% | 606.21 -23% | 300.07 -62% | 671.71 -14% | 272.41 -65% | 788 (584 - 875, n=16) 1% |
4K-64 Read | 583.98 | 1010.39 73% | 738.16 26% | 460.96 -21% | 772.2 32% | 603.87 3% | 586 (576 - 592, n=16) 0% |
4K Write | 164.37 | 134.11 -18% | 99.67 -39% | 105.65 -36% | 119.08 -28% | 118.82 -28% | 132 (77.5 - 168, n=16) -20% |
4K Read | 56.81 | 59.06 4% | 42.19 -26% | 39.74 -30% | 40.31 -29% | 45.58 -20% | 48.7 (25.6 - 57.8, n=16) -14% |
Seq Write | 1373 | 1253 -9% | 835.83 -39% | 657.79 -52% | 517.69 -62% | 592.65 -57% | 1404 (938 - 1637, n=16) 2% |
Seq Read | 1703 | 2524.94 48% | 1402.9 -18% | 2034.83 19% | 1264.37 -26% | 1295.33 -24% | 1456 (1038 - 1778, n=16) -15% |
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen) | 22% /
24% | -17% /
-18% | -35% /
-34% | -26% /
-25% | -57% /
-61% | -13% /
-13% |
* ... kleiner is beter
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (2112 - 4630, n=25) | |
HP Envy 13-aq0003ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (230 - 12199, n=431) |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL | |
HP Envy 13-aq0003ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (1418 - 3156, n=23) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (222 - 8743, n=312) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE | |
1280x720 Sky Diver Graphics | |
HP Envy 13-aq0003ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (4558 - 9444, n=7) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (511 - 15984, n=84) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
HP Envy 13-aq0003ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (7024 - 18881, n=22) | |
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1484 - 53539, n=323) |
3DMark 11 Performance | 4308 punten | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 63796 punten | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 11959 punten | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2508 punten | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 1252 punten | |
Help |
lage | gem. | hoge | ultra | ||
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 91.6 | 58.6 | 50.9 | 19.4 | fps |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 82.7 | 52.7 | 32.8 | 30 | fps |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 38.9 | 23.4 | 13.6 | fps | |
Rocket League (2017) | 100 | 52.8 | 39.6 | fps | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 28.2 | 12.5 | 12.1 | fps | |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 26.7 | 11.7 | 7.73 | fps |
Geluidsniveau
Onbelast |
| 30.3 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB (A) |
Belasting |
| 31.7 / 32.7 dB (A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB stil 40 dB(A) hoorbaar 50 dB(A) luid |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A | HP Envy 13-aq0003ng GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 1% | -2% | -3% | 1% | -3% | |
off / environment * | 30.3 | 29.3 3% | 30.4 -0% | 30.4 -0% | 28.8 5% | 30 1% |
Idle Minimum * | 30.3 | 29.3 3% | 30.4 -0% | 30.4 -0% | 28.8 5% | 30 1% |
Idle Average * | 30.3 | 29.3 3% | 30.4 -0% | 30.4 -0% | 28.8 5% | 30 1% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.3 | 29.3 3% | 30.7 -1% | 30.4 -0% | 29.7 2% | 30 1% |
Load Average * | 31.7 | 33.3 -5% | 33.7 -6% | 31.7 -0% | 30.7 3% | |
Load Maximum * | 32.7 | 33.3 -2% | 34 -4% | 38.1 -17% | 38.3 -17% | 39.5 -21% |
* ... kleiner is beter
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22 to 57 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 39.5 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.1 °C / 79 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.4 °C / 83.1 F (+2.3 °C / 4.1 F).
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A | HP Envy 13-aq0003ng GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -11% | -12% | -22% | -10% | -20% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 33.5 | 41 -22% | 40.4 -21% | 47.2 -41% | 40.3 -20% | 41 -22% |
Maximum Bottom * | 35.6 | 44.6 -25% | 42.1 -18% | 43.3 -22% | 44.6 -25% | 42.9 -21% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24.9 | 24.4 2% | 26.2 -5% | 27.6 -11% | 24.3 2% | 29.3 -18% |
Idle Bottom * | 25.4 | 25 2% | 26 -2% | 28.6 -13% | 24.4 4% | 30.2 -19% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 7.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Uit / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Inactief | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Belasting |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.50 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.30 | Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A, a-Si IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.30 | HP Envy 13-aq0003ng i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, Toshiba KBG30ZMV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -77% | -48% | -88% | -42% | -98% | -69% | -105% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.8 | 3.2 -78% | 3.4 -89% | 4.8 -167% | 3.1 -72% | 3.9 -117% | 3.83 (1.8 - 6.9, n=23) -113% | 6.31 (1.67 - 36, n=672) -251% |
Idle Average * | 4.6 | 7 -52% | 5.8 -26% | 8.6 -87% | 5.87 -28% | 7.8 -70% | 7.17 (4.6 - 10.5, n=23) -56% | 9.51 (5 - 39, n=672) -107% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.1 | 8.9 -46% | 8.8 -44% | 10.4 -70% | 6.6 -8% | 10.8 -77% | 9.03 (6.1 - 12, n=23) -48% | 11.8 (3.9 - 55, n=672) -93% |
Load Average * | 27.4 | 47.6 -74% | 34 -24% | 37.9 -38% | 35.3 -29% | 53 -93% | 39.1 (25.7 - 53.3, n=23) -43% | 33.6 (6.3 - 79.2, n=663) -23% |
Load Maximum * | 27 | 63.1 -134% | 42 -56% | 48.5 -80% | 46.5 -72% | 62.7 -132% | 49.9 (27 - 65.2, n=23) -85% | 41.1 (7.6 - 111, n=665) -52% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 54.5 Wh | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 60 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 48.8 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | HP Envy 13-aq0003ng i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 53.2 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Batterijduur | -8% | -11% | -13% | -16% | -17% | -24% | |
Reader / Idle | 1281 | 1117 -13% | 1032 -19% | 653 (87 - 2735, n=576) -49% | |||
H.264 | 627 | 793 26% | 495 -21% | 647 3% | 529 (182 - 1312, n=145) -16% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 620 | 636 3% | 573 -8% | 498 -20% | 545 -12% | 512 -17% | 508 (206 - 1223, n=296) -18% |
Load | 139 | 64 -54% | 137 -1% | 141 1% | 83 -40% | 123 (40 - 369, n=601) -12% |
Pro
Contra
Verdict – A Good Subnotebook with some Minor Flaws
Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.
De nieuwe Acer Swift 3 SF313 is op alle vlakken verbeterd. Niet alleen qua uiterlijk, maar ook intern is de boel grondig aangepakt. Intel's nieuwste Ice Lake SoC komt met een kleine prestatieverbetering, die we, eerlijk gezegd, groter hadden verwacht. De Intel Core i7-1065G7 presteert erg goed en op alle vlakken beter dan zijn Kaby Lake voorgangers. In vergelijking met andere Ice Lake notebooks blijft de Swift 3 echter enigszins achter. Het notebook scoort goed met zijn fraaie design en robuuste bouwkwaliteit. het heldere IPS beeldscherm zal zeker herinnert worden en de 3:2 beeldverhouding past goed in het algehele concept van de Swift.
De Acer Swift 3 SF313 biedt goede prestaties, lange batterijduur en een fantastisch beeldscherm zonder een groot gat in je portemonnee te slaan.
De minpunten omvatten de slechte Wi-Fi prestaties en het toetsenbord, dat bij daglicht nauwelijks te lezen was door het witte backlight. Dat gezegd hebbende kan dat wat verbeterd worden door de backlight van het toetsenbord uit te zetten. De aansluitingen zijn modern al was een tweede USB-C poort niet overbodig geweest. We zouden ook niet geklaagd hebben over de aanwezigheid van een kaartlezer of LTE-optie.
Al met al is de Swift 3 een verbetering ten opzicht van zijn voorganger in deze iver het geheel genomen solide subnotebook die het ook als multimedia notebook goed doet. Een tweede opslagapparaat en de mogelijkheid om het RAM te vervangen zouden het notebook nog beter gemaakt hebben.
Acer’s new Swift 3 SF313 is an overall improved device. It was not just redesigned to look better, but has received a major internal overhaul as well. Intel’s latest Ice Lake SoC makes for a small performance improvement, which, truth be told, we would have expected to be bigger. The Intel Core i7-1065G7 performed very well and better than its Kaby Lake predecessors. However, when compared to other similarly equipped devices, the Swift 3 fell behind. It scored with its great design and its robust build quality. The bright IPS display will definitely remain a memorable experience, and its 3:2 aspect ratio fit the Swift’s overall concept very well.
The Acer Swift 3 SF313 offers decent performance, long battery life, and a great display without stretching the budget too much.
Its flaws include the poor Wi-Fi performance and the keyboard, which was very hard to read in daylight due to its white backlight. That said, disabling the backlight in bright environments did improve upon the keyboard’s legibility somewhat. Connectivity is modern albeit a second USB-C port would not have hurt anyone. We would have also not complained about a card reader or an LTE option.
All things considered the Swift 3 is an improvement over its predecessor resulting in an all-over solid subnotebook that also does a great job as a multimedia device. Adding a secondary storage device and making the RAM upgradeable would have made the device even better than it already is.
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-71Y7 - 17-02-2020 v7
Sebastian Bade