Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Tongfang GK5CN6Z (i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD) Laptop

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Felicitas Krohn, 14-09-2018

Klein maar krachtig. Net zoals waarop je een boek niet op de kaft moet beoordelen, zou het voorbarig zijn om de kracht van een notebook te beoordelen op zijn afmetingen, en de Tulpar T5 V18.1 van de Turkse barebone-reseller Monster is daarvan het levende bewijs. De 15-inch gaming-notebook heeft een superdunne metalen behuizing die erin slaagt om een six-core CPU te huisvesten die is gecombineerd met een geavanceerde GPU. Laten we kijken of het koelsysteem deze zware klus aankan.

Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 (Tongfang GK5CN6Z)
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Core: 1405 MHz, Geheugen: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 388.73, Optimus
Geheugen
32768 MB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel, alle slots bezet, 32 GB max
Beeldscherm
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LGD05C0, IPS, FHD, 144 Hz, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
Intel HM370
Opslag
ADATA XPG Gammix S11 480GB, 480 GB 
, NVMe-SSD + Seagate Barracuda Pro ST1000LM049, 1 TB HDD, 7,200 rpm. slots: 2x M.2 Typ 2280 & 1x 2.5-inch
Geluidskaart
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: 1x koptelefoon, 1x microfoon, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 19.9 x 359 x 240
Batterij
46.74 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 3 cellen
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 2.0 (Sound Blaster Cinema 5), Toetsenbord: mechanisch, RGB, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 150 Watt stroomadapter, snelstartgids, USB-stick met drivers en hulpmiddelen, Control Center, 24 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
2.076 kg, Voeding: 496 g
Prijs
1732 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
191 MB/s ∼100% +664%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=203)
90.3 MB/s ∼47% +261%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25 MB/s ∼13%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s ∼100% +633%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=201)
109 MB/s ∼45% +230%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33 MB/s ∼14%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
682 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
682 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
674 MBit/s ∼99%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
666 MBit/s ∼98% -1%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
660 MBit/s ∼97% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=175)
595 MBit/s ∼87% -12%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
662 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
661 MBit/s ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
642 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
593 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (213 - 697, n=175)
533 MBit/s ∼81% -19%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
379 MBit/s ∼57% -43%
307
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 335 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 314.7 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 89 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 335 cd/m²
Contrast: 1015:1 (Zwart: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.66 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 1.37
ΔE Greyscale 4.26 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
94% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
AU Optronics AUO45ED, IPS, 1920x1080
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
-112%
8%
-9%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16 (8.4, 7.6)
30.8 (13.6, 17.2)
-93%
13.6 (7.6, 6)
15%
17.6 (9.2, 8.4)
-10%
16.8 (8.4, 8.4)
-5%
Response Time Black / White *
12 (6.8, 5.2)
27.6 (16, 11.6)
-130%
12 (7.6, 4.4)
-0%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
-7%
11.2 (6, 5.2)
7%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-7%
10%
9%
19%
Brightness middle
335
286.7
-14%
304.3
-9%
254
-24%
313
-7%
Brightness
315
281
-11%
293
-7%
262
-17%
300
-5%
Brightness Distribution
89
92
3%
80
-10%
89
0%
78
-12%
Black Level *
0.33
0.39
-18%
0.38
-15%
0.22
33%
0.33
-0%
Contrast
1015
735
-28%
801
-21%
1155
14%
948
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.66
4.17
-14%
1.79
51%
2.37
35%
1.29
65%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.56
7.22
-10%
3.69
44%
4.71
28%
2.04
69%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.37
1.84
-34%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.26
2.5
41%
1.1
74%
1.58
63%
0.69
84%
Gamma
2.35 94%
2.274 97%
2.27 97%
2.48 89%
2.43 91%
CCT
6461 101%
6885 94%
6665 98%
6785 96%
6550 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61
57
-7%
59.8
-2%
60
-2%
60
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94
87
-7%
92.8
-1%
92
-2%
94
0%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
-60% / -24%
9% / 10%
0% / 6%
10% / 16%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
12 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 6.8 ms stijging
↘ 5.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
16 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 8.4 ms stijging
↘ 7.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (41 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 52 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8773 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
Latenzen
 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points ∼100% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼99% 0%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼99% 0%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼99%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
168 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 209, n=413)
151 Points ∼86% -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1133 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1113 Points ∼98% +2%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
Intel Core i7-8750H
1093 Points ∼96%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
1053 Points ∼93% -4%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Core i7-8750H
915 Points ∼81% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1865, n=414)
744 Points ∼66% -32%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
2 Points ∼100% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points ∼99% 0%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points ∼99%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.92 Points ∼96% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=406)
1.679 Points ∼84% -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.93 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.55 Points ∼97% +4%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.08 Points ∼93%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.82 Points ∼91% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.2, n=507)
7.26 Points ∼56% -40%
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.98 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
12.08 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
175 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1093 Points
Help
PCMark 10 - Score
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5184 Points ∼100% +5%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5095 Points ∼98% +3%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5092 Points ∼98% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5059 Points ∼98% +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 6959, n=115)
4933 Points ∼95% 0%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, ADATA XPG Gammix S11 480GB
4931 Points ∼95%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5705 Points ∼100% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5676 Points ∼99% +3%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5621 Points ∼99% +2%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, ADATA XPG Gammix S11 480GB
5486 Points ∼96%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
5111 Points ∼90% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=310)
4919 Points ∼86% -10%
Home Score Accelerated v2
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4665 Points ∼100% +2%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4650 Points ∼100% +2%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, ADATA XPG Gammix S11 480GB
4565 Points ∼98%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4504 Points ∼97% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=328)
4218 Points ∼90% -8%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
4119 Points ∼88% -10%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4565 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5486 punten
Help
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
ADATA XPG Gammix S11 480GB
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
AS SSD
-59%
28%
24%
-12%
Score Total
3101
900
-71%
4095
32%
4122
33%
2536
-18%
Score Write
996
345
-65%
1955
96%
2051
106%
939
-6%
Score Read
1397
377
-73%
1407
1%
1346
-4%
1092
-22%
4K Write
101.32
67.1
-34%
99.18
-2%
107.15
6%
80.44
-21%
4K Read
52.88
22.62
-57%
48.56
-8%
48.94
-7%
23.36
-56%
Seq Write
1214.87
404.73
-67%
1916.59
58%
1834.04
51%
1163.11
-4%
Seq Read
1570.64
840.77
-46%
1819.95
16%
1266.1
-19%
2212.97
41%
ADATA XPG Gammix S11 480GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1677 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1643 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 363.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 307.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1671 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1579 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 52.39 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 97.03 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
15156 Points ∼100% +30%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
14780 Points ∼98% +27%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11733 Points ∼77% +1%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11621 Points ∼77%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
11315 Points ∼75% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=441)
10260 Points ∼68% -12%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
19162 Points ∼100% +32%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18687 Points ∼98% +29%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14975 Points ∼78% +3%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14507 Points ∼76%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
14180 Points ∼74% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=515)
11872 Points ∼62% -18%
3DMark 11 Performance
13166 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
31561 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
10195 punten
Help
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
52.7 fps ∼100% +35%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
52.4 fps ∼99% +35%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=217)
44.8 fps ∼85% +15%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
39 fps ∼74% 0%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
38.9 fps ∼74%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
37 fps ∼70% -5%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
95.5 fps ∼100% +36%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
92.8 fps ∼97% +32%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 184, n=181)
75.3 fps ∼79% +7%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
74.2 fps ∼78% +5%
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
70.4 fps ∼74%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
66 fps ∼69% -6%
lage gem. hoge ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 70.438.9fps
FIFA 18 (2017) 217213fps
Destiny 2 (2017) 94.278.4fps
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) 6554fps
Need for Speed Payback (2017) 82.177.1fps
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 74.862.3fps
The Crew 2 (2018) 59.458fps
F1 2018 (2018) 8460fps

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
29 / 33 / 39 dB (A)
HDD
33 dB (A)
Belasting
49 / 58 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
5%
10%
10%
3%
6%
off / environment *
29
28.6
1%
28.1
3%
30
-3%
29
-0%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=222)
-1%
Idle Minimum *
29
31.4
-8%
28.1
3%
30
-3%
30
-3%
31.6 (28 - 41.7, n=643)
-9%
Idle Average *
33
31.4
5%
33
-0%
31
6%
31
6%
32.8 (28 - 46.6, n=643)
1%
Idle Maximum *
39
34.2
12%
33.5
14%
34
13%
35
10%
34.7 (28 - 50.4, n=643)
11%
Load Average *
49
42.8
13%
42.2
14%
43
12%
49
-0%
40.4 (30.3 - 58, n=644)
18%
Witcher 3 ultra *
52
50.9
2%
45.3
13%
42
19%
51
2%
Load Maximum *
58
50.9
12%
45.7
21%
44
24%
54
7%
47.7 (38.9 - 64, n=644)
18%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 51 °C52 °C43 °C 
 43 °C46 °C39 °C 
 41 °C41 °C38 °C 
Maximum: 52 °C
Gemiddelde: 43.8 °C
63 °C65 °C49 °C
64 °C64 °C44 °C
33 °C34 °C32 °C
Maximum: 65 °C
Gemiddelde: 49.8 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  56 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the bottom side is 65 °C / 149 F, compared to the average of 41.6 °C / 107 F, ranging from 21.1 to 78 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-12.3 °C / -22.1 F).
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
9%
-1%
12%
3%
7%
Maximum Upper Side *
52
43
17%
51.2
2%
49
6%
53
-2%
45.5 (28 - 68.8, n=608)
12%
Maximum Bottom *
65
46.6
28%
55.2
15%
63
3%
65
-0%
49.1 (25.9 - 78, n=606)
24%
Idle Upper Side *
30
29.2
3%
31
-3%
24
20%
26
13%
30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=559)
-3%
Idle Bottom *
30
34
-13%
35.6
-19%
25
17%
30
-0%
31.6 (21.1 - 50.3, n=557)
-5%

* ... kleiner is beter

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.142.62535.936.73127.932.64032.335.15026.227.7632626.78027.327.310027.730.912527.842.216022.624.92002530.425022.543.631522.452.440018.857.750017.457.963017.264.280018.269.3100018.667.5125017.565.7160016.863.6200017.161.9250017.257.5315017.160.8400017.456.1500017.263.5630017.264.5800017.160.11000017.250.81250017.349.61600017.255.7SPL29.975.3N1.435.1median 17.4median 57.7Delta1.89.538.637.53535.635.733.934.434.132.236.934.237.131.844.930.251.729.257.429.665.728.564.327.464.827.563.426.359.326.358.925.162.625.666.225.5662564.42564.524.26724.470.924.571.623.974.323.769.423.765.823.466.623.464.323.558.723.450.336.880.82.850.1median 25median 64.51.82.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMonster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (24.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.27 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 1.5 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 10 / 12 / 18 Watt
Belasting midlight 93 / 152 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-25%
-19%
-3%
-26%
-62%
Idle Minimum *
10
12.35
-24%
14.9
-49%
7
30%
14
-40%
20.2 (3.9 - 113, n=603)
-102%
Idle Average *
12
19.98
-67%
17.5
-46%
11
8%
18
-50%
25.8 (6.8 - 119, n=603)
-115%
Idle Maximum *
18
25.44
-41%
19.2
-7%
20
-11%
22
-22%
30.9 (8.3 - 122, n=603)
-72%
Load Average *
93
94.28
-1%
103.2
-11%
98
-5%
91
2%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=594)
-12%
Load Maximum *
152
140.63
7%
132.7
13%
182
-20%
173
-14%
166 (21.9 - 590, n=593)
-9%
Witcher 3 ultra *
110
132.86
-21%
123.1
-12%
132
-20%
142
-29%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
5h 05min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4h 03min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
1h 41min
Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, 46.74 Wh
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, 55 Wh
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, 80 Wh
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, 82 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, 94.24 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Batterijduur
-22%
65%
32%
105%
-4%
Reader / Idle
305
271
-11%
507
66%
762
150%
329 (39 - 1174, n=591)
8%
WiFi v1.3
243
240
-1%
402
65%
362
49%
513
111%
249 (78 - 622, n=267)
2%
Load
101
45
-55%
81
-20%
156
54%
78.5 (18 - 202, n=559)
-22%
H.264
356
504
244 (88 - 506, n=122)

Pro

+ lichte en compacte behuizing
+ 144 Hz beeldscherm (optioneel)
+ mechanisch toetsenbord
+ RGB verlichting
+ dunne beeldschermranden
+ NVMe-SSD
+ snelle Wi-Fi module
+ Optimus

Contra

- geen Thunderbolt 3 of USB 3.1 Gen2
- enorm fluctuerende CPU turbo
- slechte geluidskwaliteit
- langzame kaartlezer
- slechte ventilatorcontrole
- bleeding van het beeldscherm
- kleine batterij
- zoemende ventilator
Monster Tulpar T5. Testmodel geleverd door Monster Notebook.
Monster Tulpar T5. Testmodel geleverd door Monster Notebook.

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

Aan het einde van onze tests is ons oordeel voor de Tulpar T5 V18.1 identiek aan die van de Schenker XMG Neo 15 die is gebaseerd op dezelfde Tongfang GK5CN6Z barebone.

Het zeer degelijke 144 Hz IPS-paneel met zeer smalle beeldschermranden en het mechanische toetsenbord met achtergrondverlichting zijn zeker grote pluspunten. Andere troeven zijn het lage gewicht en het lage profiel, waardoor deze 15-inch gaming-notebook perfect is om mee te nemen.

De slechte geluidsprestaties, de kleine batterij en de zeer slechte ventilatorcontrole stonden echter een betere algehele score in de weg. Het apparaat was buitengewoon luid bij het uitvoeren van 3D-applicaties, wat zeker een aanzienlijk aantal potentiële kopers zal afschrikken.

The Monster notebook zou onze Thin & Light Top 10 nauwelijks bereiken.

Monster Tulpar T5 V18.1.1 - 11-09-2018 v6
Florian Glaser

Behuizing
84 / 98 → 86%
Toetsenbord
89%
Aanwijsapparaat
81%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
62 / 81 → 77%
Gewicht
63 / 10-66 → 94%
Batterij
75%
Beeldscherm
88%
Gaming-performance
93%
Applicatie-performance
97%
Temperatuur
75 / 95 → 79%
Luidheid
56 / 90 → 62%
Audio
58%
Gemiddelde
77%
84%
Gaming - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Monster Tulpar T5
Monster Tulpar T5
Monster Tulpar T5
Monster Tulpar T5
Monster Tulpar T5
Monster Tulpar T5
Monster Tulpar T5
Monster Tulpar T5
Monster Tulpar T5
Monster Tulpar T5
Monster Tulpar T5
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Tongfang GK5CN6Z (i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD) Laptop
Florian Glaser, 2018-09-14 (Update: 2018-09-14)