Kort testrapport Schenker XMG Apex 15 (Clevo N950TP6) Laptop

Name: Kort testrapport Schenker XMG Apex 15 (Clevo N950TP6) Laptop
Item: Schenker XMG Apex 15
Rating: 84
Author: Sven Kloevekorn

Sven Kloevekorn, 👁 Florian Glaser, ✓ Stefanie Voigt, 05-05-2018

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows

GTX 1060 ontketend. Intels gloednieuwe desktop hexa-core Core i7-8700 is de ster van Schenker's nieuwe 15 inch Apex notebook. Het apparaat is enigszins overmaats voor een gaming notebook en bevat een snelle GeForce GTX 1060 GPU. De laptop mist G-Sync ondersteuning maar biedt in ruil daarvoor vele aansluitingen. Helaas wordt het apparaat geplaagd door een probleem niet gerelateerd aan gamen.

Testtoestel voorzien door Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Top 10 Testrapporten

» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €120
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €300
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Windows-Tablets
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5-inch)
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5-inch)
» Best Geteste Notebook Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000 Notebookcheck's Beste Notebook-Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300

Size Comparison

HP Omen 15t-ce000 Schenker XMG Core 15 MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider Schenker XMG Apex 15

Linkerkant: ventilatoropeningen, USB 3.1 Gen 2, USB 2.0, audio-in (microfoon), audio-uit (koptelefoon)

Rechterkant: kaartlezer, USB 3.1 Gen 1, USB 3.1 Gen 2 Type-C, 2x Mini DisplayPort, HDMI 2.0, Ethernet, stroomaansluiting, Kensington lock

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	178 MB/s ∼100% +114%
Average of class Gaming (11.7 - 202, n=205)	90.1 MB/s ∼51% +9%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	83 MB/s ∼47%
Schenker XMG Core 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	80 MB/s ∼45% -4%
HP Omen 15t-ce000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	73.5 MB/s ∼41% -11%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	200 MB/s ∼100% +127%
Average of class Gaming (13.4 - 257, n=203)	109 MB/s ∼55% +24%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	88 MB/s ∼44%
HP Omen 15t-ce000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	87.5 MB/s ∼44% -1%
Schenker XMG Core 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	87 MB/s ∼44% -1%

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter	685 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	672 MBit/s ∼98%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	664 MBit/s ∼97% -1%
Average of class Gaming (141 - 702, n=182)	595 MBit/s ∼87% -11%
HP Omen 15t-ce000 Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	546 MBit/s ∼80% -19%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 15t-ce000 Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	633 MBit/s ∼100% +27%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter	540 MBit/s ∼85% +8%
Average of class Gaming (144 - 721, n=182)	535 MBit/s ∼85% +7%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	499 MBit/s ∼79%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	373 MBit/s ∼59% -25%


267 cd/m²	279 cd/m²	290 cd/m²
264 cd/m²	269 cd/m²	285 cd/m²
263 cd/m²	272 cd/m²	281 cd/m²

Helderheidsverdeling

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 290 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 274.4 cd/m² Minimum: 23 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 91 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 269 cd/m²
Contrast: 1170:1 (Zwart: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.25 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 2.51
ΔE Greyscale 3.11 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
83% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.36

ICC-profiel (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Schenker XMG Apex 15 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 1920x1080	MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider Chi Mei N156HHE-GA1 (CMN15F4), TN LED, 1920x1080	HP Omen 15t-ce000 AU Optronics AUO23EB, IPS, 3840x2160	Schenker XMG Core 15 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times		60%	17%	3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	42.4 (20.4, 22)	9.6 (5.2, 4.4) 77%	37.6 (19.6, 18) 11%	40.8 (20.4, 20.4) 4%
Response Time Black / White *	32 (18, 14)	7.2 (5, 2.2) 77%	24.8 (12.4, 12.4) 22%	30.4 (16.4, 14) 5%
PWM Frequency	20490 (99)	26000 (25) 27%		20490 (95) 0%
Screen		12%	-5%	-11%
Brightness middle	269	285 6%	358.5 33%	297 10%
Brightness	274	273 0%	350 28%	276 1%
Brightness Distribution	91	84 -8%	95 4%	87 -4%
Black Level *	0.23	0.23 -0%	0.39 -70%	0.3 -30%
Contrast	1170	1239 6%	919 -21%	990 -15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	4.25	3.52 17%	4.6 -8%	5.25 -24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	10.39	5.18 50%	8.5 18%	10.3 1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *	2.51
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	3.11	3.41 -10%	5.2 -67%	4.64 -49%
Gamma	2.36 ^93%	2.05 ^107%	2.28 ^96%	2.39 ^92%
CCT	6851 ^95%	7077 ^92%	6410 ^101%	6600 ^98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	54	77 43%	66.9 24%	54 0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	83	100 20%	91.8 11%	83 0%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)		36% / 23%	6% / -1%	-4% / -8%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

ℹ

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.

↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
32 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↗ 18 ms stijging
32 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↘ 14 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (25.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
42.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↗ 20.4 ms stijging
42.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↘ 22 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (41 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.

Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen

20490 Hz

≤ 99 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 20490 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 99 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 20490 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen.

Ter vergelijking: 52 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9063 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Apex 15 Intel Core i7-8700	197 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8700 (190 - 197, n=3)	193 Points ∼98% -2%
HP Omen 15t-ce000 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	161 Points ∼82% -18%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider Intel Core i7-7700HQ	160 Points ∼81% -19%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	160 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Gaming (79 - 209, n=423)	152 Points ∼77% -23%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Apex 15 Intel Core i7-8700	1215 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8700 (1167 - 1215, n=3)	1187 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Gaming (196 - 1865, n=424)	751 Points ∼62% -38%
HP Omen 15t-ce000 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	730 Points ∼60% -40%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider Intel Core i7-7700HQ	729 Points ∼60% -40%
Schenker XMG Core 15 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	722 Points ∼59% -41%

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

7257

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

38543

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

197 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1215 Points

Help

... in vergelijking

PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Apex 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe	5653 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8700, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	5653 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe	5332 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	5270 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Gaming (2484 - 6515, n=317)	4931 Points ∼87% -13%
HP Omen 15t-ce000 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR	2484 Points ∼44% -56%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Apex 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe	4697 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8700, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	4697 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe	4626 Points ∼98% -2%
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	4406 Points ∼94% -6%
HP Omen 15t-ce000 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR	4325 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming (2554 - 6093, n=335)	4222 Points ∼90% -10%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4697 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5653 punten
Help

	Schenker XMG Apex 15 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe	MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	HP Omen 15t-ce000 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR	Schenker XMG Core 15 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe	Average Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-59%	-40%	-12%	-4%
Write 4k QD32	570.7	190.3 -67%	173.9 -70%	481.9 -16%	511 (410 - 579, n=6) -10%
Read 4k QD32	675.6	368.8 -45%	517.6 -23%	577.2 -15%	617 (481 - 711, n=6) -9%
Write 4k	164.1	88.91 -46%	130.7 -20%	134 -18%	142 (77.5 - 174, n=6) -13%
Read 4k	59.96	21.77 -64%	46.09 -23%	58.35 -3%	54.2 (34.4 - 60, n=6) -10%
Write 512	1007	409.9 -59%	174 -83%	1006 0%	1065 (860 - 1246, n=6) 6%
Read 512	791.8	411.9 -48%	503.3 -36%	779.8 -2%	880 (710 - 1088, n=6) 11%
Write Seq	1375	441.4 -68%	748.8 -46%	1188 -14%	1408 (1188 - 1563, n=6) 2%
Read Seq	1751	506.6 -71%	1411 -19%	1338 -24%	1642 (1338 - 1920, n=6) -6%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe

Sequential Read: 1751 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1375 MB/s

512K Read: 791.8 MB/s

512K Write: 1007 MB/s

4K Read: 59.96 MB/s

4K Write: 164.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 675.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 570.7 MB/s

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)	17793 Points ∼100% +47%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	12138 Points ∼68%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) (10708 - 12298, n=77)	11547 Points ∼65% -5%
Schenker XMG Core 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	11322 Points ∼64% -7%
Average of class Gaming (385 - 40636, n=451)	10264 Points ∼58% -15%
HP Omen 15t-ce000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q	9992 Points ∼56% -18%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)	23246 Points ∼100% +53%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	15149 Points ∼65%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) (12620 - 15607, n=77)	14692 Points ∼63% -3%
Schenker XMG Core 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	14471 Points ∼62% -4%
HP Omen 15t-ce000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q	12970 Points ∼56% -14%
Average of class Gaming (513 - 50983, n=524)	11902 Points ∼51% -21%

3DMark 11 Performance		14618 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		36010 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score		10794 punten
Help

... in vergelijking

The Witcher 3 ultra

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	62.2 fps ∼100% +48%
Average of class Gaming (12.6 - 115, n=226)	44.4 fps ∼71% +6%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700	41.9 fps ∼67%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) (24 - 42.3, n=60)	38.6 fps ∼62% -8%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ	38.2 fps ∼61% -9%
HP Omen 15t-ce000 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ	35 fps ∼56% -16%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Schenker XMG Apex 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700	77.6 fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming (11.1 - 184, n=190)	74.8 fps ∼96% -4%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ	69.57 fps ∼90% -10%
HP Omen 15t-ce000 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ	68.5 fps ∼88% -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) (52.6 - 80.6, n=49)	68 fps ∼88% -12%

Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	102.5 fps ∼100% +51%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700	67.9 fps ∼66%
Average of class Gaming (8.9 - 126, n=145)	62.4 fps ∼61% -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) (51 - 68.8, n=37)	61.3 fps ∼60% -10%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ	59.36 fps ∼58% -13%
HP Omen 15t-ce000 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ	54.6 fps ∼53% -20%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	118.8 fps ∼100% +56%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700	76.1 fps ∼64%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) (65.3 - 82, n=24)	73.3 fps ∼62% -4%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ	71.05 fps ∼60% -7%
HP Omen 15t-ce000 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ	67.6 fps ∼57% -11%
Average of class Gaming (11.6 - 154, n=110)	67.5 fps ∼57% -11%

The Division
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (7.6 - 124, n=38)	60.6 fps ∼100% +7%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700	56.7 fps ∼94%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) (37.8 - 57.4, n=7)	50.7 fps ∼84% -11%
1920x1080 High Preset AF:8x
Average of class Gaming (10.1 - 138, n=38)	75.6 fps ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700	72.8 fps ∼96%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) (46.9 - 73.3, n=6)	64.3 fps ∼85% -12%

For Honor
1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	113 fps ∼100% +43%
Average of class Gaming (40.6 - 182, n=25)	102 fps ∼90% +29%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700	78.9 fps ∼70%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) (42.4 - 78.9, n=8)	68.6 fps ∼61% -13%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:8x
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	144.4 fps ∼100% +40%
Average of class Gaming (13.8 - 194, n=26)	128 fps ∼89% +24%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700	103.2 fps ∼71%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) (56.3 - 103, n=7)	92.6 fps ∼64% -10%

Ghost Recon Wildlands
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	52.2 fps ∼100% +35%
Average of class Gaming (2.4 - 82.7, n=27)	44.7 fps ∼86% +16%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700	38.7 fps ∼74%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) (34.5 - 38.7, n=6)	36.9 fps ∼71% -5%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:4x
MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ	90.8 fps ∼100% +34%
Average of class Gaming (9.8 - 122, n=27)	78.4 fps ∼86% +16%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700	67.8 fps ∼75%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) (60.1 - 67.8, n=6)	64.8 fps ∼71% -4%

Assassin´s Creed Origins
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Average of class Gaming (28 - 86, n=19)	57.3 fps ∼100% +2%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700	56 fps ∼98%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) (42 - 56, n=5)	49.8 fps ∼87% -11%
1920x1080 High Preset
Schenker XMG Apex 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700	66 fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming (10 - 107, n=20)	64.6 fps ∼98% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) (49 - 66, n=5)	59.4 fps ∼90% -10%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 High Quality
Schenker XMG Apex 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700	47.3 fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming (18.6 - 80, n=23)	47 fps ∼99% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) (37.2 - 47.3, n=5)	41.5 fps ∼88% -12%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Schenker XMG Apex 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700	62.4 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) (58.6 - 62.4, n=2)	60.5 fps ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming (30.2 - 86, n=11)	49.8 fps ∼80% -20%

Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (10 - 113, n=21)	69.2 fps ∼100% +8%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700	64 fps ∼92%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) (59 - 65, n=5)	63.2 fps ∼91% -1%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (10 - 120, n=21)	74.2 fps ∼100% +8%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8700	69 fps ∼93%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) (62 - 69, n=5)	67.2 fps ∼91% -3%

	lage	gem.	hoge	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)			77.6	41.9	fps
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)				118	fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)			76.1	67.9	fps
The Division (2016)			72.8	56.7	fps
For Honor (2017)		108.3	103.2	78.9	fps
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)			67.8	38.7	fps
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017)		74	66	56	fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)		62.4	47.3		fps
Far Cry 5 (2018)		75	69	64	fps

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast		32 / 33 / 38 dB (A)
HDD		33 dB (A)
Belasting		47 / 52 dB (A)

	30 dB stil 40 dB(A) hoorbaar 50 dB(A) luid
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

Max. Belasting

Inactief

Witcher 3


46 °C	50 °C	45 °C
47 °C	50 °C	45 °C
41 °C	43 °C	40 °C

Maximum: 50 °C
Gemiddelde: 45.2 °C


44 °C	48 °C	47 °C
42 °C	49 °C	47 °C
32 °C	34 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 49 °C
Gemiddelde: 41.6 °C

Stroomadapter (max.) 45 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Belasting

Inactief

Witcher 3


25 °C	25 °C	24 °C
26 °C	26 °C	26 °C
26 °C	26 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 26 °C
Gemiddelde: 25.6 °C


26 °C	27 °C	26 °C
25 °C	27 °C	26 °C
27 °C	26 °C	24 °C

Maximum: 27 °C
Gemiddelde: 26 °C

Stroomadapter (max.) 25 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Belasting

Inactief

Witcher 3


41 °C	46 °C	46 °C
41 °C	46 °C	44 °C
38 °C	41 °C	41 °C

Maximum: 46 °C
Gemiddelde: 42.7 °C


46 °C	47 °C	40 °C
42 °C	47 °C	40 °C
31 °C	32 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 47 °C
Gemiddelde: 39 °C

Stroomadapter (max.) 43 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 41.6 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 43 °C / 109.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-14.3 °C / -25.7 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Schenker XMG Apex 15 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HP Omen 15t-ce000 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Schenker XMG Core 15 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik

Uit / Standby	0.4 / 1.1 Watt
Inactief	7 / 10 / 14 Watt
Belasting	114 / 164 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Schenker XMG Apex 15 8700, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)	HP Omen 15t-ce000 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q	Schenker XMG Core 15 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-38%	-38%	-57%	-91%
Idle Minimum *	7	11 -57%	15.4 -120%	18 -157%	20.1 (3.9 - 113, n=612) -187%
Idle Average *	10	16 -60%	22.4 -124%	22 -120%	25.6 (6.8 - 119, n=612) -156%
Idle Maximum *	14	21 -50%	22.4 -60%	26 -86%	30.7 (8.3 - 122, n=612) -119%
Load Average *	114	92 19%	78.1 31%	93 18%	104 (14.1 - 319, n=603) 9%
Load Maximum *	164	224 -37%	133.52 19%	175 -7%	166 (21.9 - 590, n=602) -1%
Witcher 3 ultra *	131	185 -41%	97.5 26%	119 9%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur

Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)		9h 35min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		5h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5h 04min
Belast (maximale helderheid)		1h 50min

	Schenker XMG Apex 15 8700, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 62 Wh	MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 51 Wh	HP Omen 15t-ce000 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 Wh	Schenker XMG Core 15 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 82 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Batterijduur		-49%	-37%	-29%	-29%
Reader / Idle	575	323 -44%	298 -48%	300 -48%	333 (39 - 1174, n=600) -42%
H.264	304			234 -23%	244 (88 - 506, n=124) -20%
WiFi v1.3	334	201 -40%	208 -38%	282 -16%	251 (78 - 622, n=275) -25%
Load	110	42 -62%	83 -25%	80 -27%	78.5 (18 - 202, n=566) -29%

Pro

+ Uitgebreid te configureren

+ Vele aansluitingen

+ Eenvoudig onderhoud

+ Stijlvol gaming toetsenbord met RGB verlichting, effecten en macrotoetsen

+ Lage zwartwaardes, contrastrijk

+ Brede kijkhoeken

+ Snelle SSD

+ GTX 1060 prestaties zijn bovengemiddeld

+ Laag energieverbruik wanneer inactief

+ Degelijke looptijden voor een gaming notebook

Contra

- Relatief groot en zwaar

- Beeldscherm niet bijzonder stevig

- Bleeding

- Vertekeningen op het beeldscherm bij aanrakingen

- Langzame responstijden

- Slechte geluidskwaliteit

Schenker XMG Apex 15. Testmodel geleverd door Schenker Germany.

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

Toegegeven, de Core i7-8700 CPU is overmatig krachtig voor gamen alleen. Echter, dit hoeft geen slechte eigenschap te zijn aangezien de gebruikelijke nadelen zoals een hoog energieverbruik en luid koelsysteem nu ontbreken.

Alles bij elkaar is de Apex 15 een aantrekkelijke notebook. Echter, het slecht ontworpen beeldscherm gooit roet in het eten.

Voor een prijskaartje van €1700 krijg je een solide gaming notebook zonder extra's zoals G-Sync of Thunderbolt 3. Als je niet van plan bent om een hogere resolutie dan FHD te gebruiken, zal de GTX 1060 de komende jaren nog voldoen, vooral aangezien de Apex 15 het maximale uit de grafische kaart weet te halen.

De verbindingsmogelijkheden laten de notebook opvallen tussen de concurrenten en ook de onderhoudsmogelijkheden zijn praktisch perfect. Inderdaad, het beeldscherm is niet volledig geschikt voor gamen, maar het paneel vervult z'n rol. De snelle CPU wordt vergezeld door een vlotte SSD en het lage energieverbruik resulteert in lange looptijden. De meeste kritiek betreft het beeldscherm, in het bijzonder de beeldschermdeksel. Hoewel we simpelweg niet begrijpen welke keuzes hebben geleid tot het huidige ontwerp, verdient de notebook nog steeds onze volledige steun. Als je meer grafische rekenkracht nodig hebt, is MSI notebook met GTX 1070 wellicht een betere keuze. Echter, wees bewust van het TN beeldscherm.

Schenker XMG Apex 15 - 2018-04-2828-04-2018 v6
Sven Kloevekorn

Behuizing

74 / 98 → 75%

Toetsenbord

85%

Aanwijsapparaat

83%

Aansluitmogelijkheden

64 / 81 → 79%

Gewicht

58 / 10-66 → 86%

Batterij

83%

Beeldscherm

86%

Gaming-performance

94%

Applicatie-performance

99%

Temperatuur

81 / 95 → 85%

Luidheid

67 / 90 → 74%

Audio

50%

Camera

63 / 85 → 74%

Gemiddelde

76%

84%

Gaming - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Kort testrapport Schenker XMG Apex 15 (Clevo N950TP6) Laptop

Top 10 Testrapporten

Size Comparison

Responstijd Scherm

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Schenker XMG Apex 15 audio analysis

MSI GE63VR 7RF Raider audio analysis

HP Omen 15t-ce000 audio analysis

Schenker XMG Core 15 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Pricecompare