Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Realme 6 Smartphone: 90 Hz Is niet alles

Mid-range excellence. Realme, de nieuwe ster in het smartphone-universum, introduceert een 90-Hz beeldscherm in het middenbereik voor €230-€300, afhankelijk van de configuratie. De low-end configuratie bevat 64 GB ROM en 4 GB RAM.
Inge Schwabe, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger,
realme 6 (6 Serie)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G90T 8 x 2.1 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-G76 MP4
Geheugen
8192 MB 
Beeldscherm
6.5 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, capacitief touchscreen, 5 multi-touch punten, IPS, glimmend: ja, 90 Hz
Opslag
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 115 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5 mm koptelefoon poort, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32, exFAT, up to 256 GB), 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Magnetische inductiesensor, nabijheidssensor, gyroscoop, versnellingsmeter
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900 MHz) 3G (bands 1, 5, 8) 4G (bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.9 x 162.1 x 74.8
Batterij
4300 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Besturingssysteem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix Quad-camera: 64MP groothoeklens (78.6 degrees, 26mm, f/1.8, 6P lens, Samsung GW1, 1/1.72”), 8MP ultra wide-angle (119 degrees, f/2.3, 5P lens), 2MP macro (4cm focus, f/2.4, 3P lens), 2MP monochrome sensor (f/2.4, 3P lens); Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix 79.3 graden, f/2.0, 5P lens
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Mono speaker, Toetsenbord: Digitaal, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, Realme 6, 30W quick charger, USB Type-C-cable, case, screen protector, SIM tool, documentation, warranty card, realme UI, 24 Maanden Garantie, DRM Widevine L1; FM tuner; GNSS: GPS, AGPS, GLONASS, BeiDou; SAR (Head): <2 (according to the manufacturer), fanless
Gewicht
191 g, Voeding: 124 g
Prijs
299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Drive
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
81 %
06-2020
realme 6
Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4
191 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.5"2400x1080
79 %
11-2019
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
SD 665, Adreno 610
190 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
80 %
01-2020
Samsung Galaxy A51
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.5"2400x1080
84 %
10-2019
Huawei Nova 5T
Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10
174 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.26"2340x1080

Size Comparison

162.1 mm 74.8 mm 8.9 mm 191 g158.3 mm 75.3 mm 8.3 mm 190 g158.5 mm 73.6 mm 7.9 mm 172 g154.25 mm 73.97 mm 7.87 mm 174 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
339 (min: 320, max: 349) MBit/s ∼100% +4%
realme 6
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
326 (min: 162, max: 354) MBit/s ∼96%
Huawei Nova 5T
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
317 (min: 30, max: 340) MBit/s ∼94% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
298 (min: 185, max: 350) MBit/s ∼88% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=553)
264 MBit/s ∼78% -19%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
realme 6
Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G90T, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
338 (min: 323, max: 344) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei Nova 5T
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
315 (min: 226, max: 345) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
303 (min: 242, max: 355) MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
297 (min: 189, max: 335) MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=553)
250 MBit/s ∼74% -26%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360Tooltip
realme 6 Mediatek Helio G90T, ARM Mali-G76 MP4; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø322 (162-354)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø339 (320-349)
realme 6 Mediatek Helio G90T, ARM Mali-G76 MP4; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø338 (323-344)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø303 (242-355)

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3Scene 4
klik om beelden te laden
ColorChecker
27.8 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
39.7 ∆E
53.4 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
27 ∆E
54.5 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
42.4 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
55.4 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
52.2 ∆E
57.4 ∆E
46.4 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker realme 6: 38.39 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 57.37 ∆E
ColorChecker
7.3 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
ColorChecker realme 6: 5.32 ∆E min: 2 - max: 13.51 ∆E
427
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
403
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 456 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 427.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.4 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 88 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 456 cd/m²
Contrast: 991:1 (Zwart: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
98.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
realme 6
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Samsung Galaxy A51
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5
Huawei Nova 5T
LTPS, 2340x1080, 6.26
Screen
38%
26%
-17%
Brightness middle
456
656
44%
589
29%
524
15%
Brightness
427
643
51%
589
38%
510
19%
Brightness Distribution
88
95
8%
94
7%
86
-2%
Black Level *
0.46
0.54
-17%
0.39
15%
Contrast
991
1215
23%
1344
36%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.4
1.1
75%
2.22
50%
6.6
-50%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.7
2.4
69%
8.24
-7%
12.2
-58%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.4
2.2
50%
2.6
41%
9.1
-107%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.2 100%
2.111 104%
2.34 94%
CCT
7154 91%
6263 104%
6508 100%
8987 72%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 18037 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
15.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 6 ms stijging
↘ 9.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
35.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 17.6 ms stijging
↘ 18 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (39.2 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
1931 Points ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
 
1931 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=65)
1644 Points ∼85% -15%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2056 Points ∼100%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
 
2056 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=60)
1770 Points ∼86% -14%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
1715 Points ∼87%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
 
1715 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (445 - 3531, n=82)
1977 Points ∼100% +15%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
545 Points ∼97%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
 
545 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=82)
564 Points ∼100% +3%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
5862 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
5122 Points ∼87% -13%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (5702 - 5862, n=2)
5782 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=349)
4826 Points ∼82% -18%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
7795 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
5366 Points ∼69% -31%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (7624 - 7795, n=2)
7710 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13589, n=411)
4928 Points ∼63% -37%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2594 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1495 Points ∼58% -42%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (2484 - 2594, n=2)
2539 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=411)
1500 Points ∼58% -42%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
10512 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6498 Points ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5649 Points ∼54% -46%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8279 Points ∼79% -21%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (9967 - 10512, n=2)
10240 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=483)
5784 Points ∼55% -45%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
14669 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
7446 Points ∼50% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6416 Points ∼43% -56%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
10209 Points ∼69% -30%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (14669 - 14946, n=2)
14808 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=641)
6329 Points ∼43% -57%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2333 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2250 Points ∼66% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2161 Points ∼63% -7%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3406 Points ∼100% +46%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (2333 - 2543, n=2)
2438 Points ∼72% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=143)
2634 Points ∼77% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2524 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
898 Points ∼19% -64%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1438 Points ∼30% -43%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4853 Points ∼100% +92%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (1978 - 2524, n=2)
2251 Points ∼46% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=143)
2907 Points ∼60% +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2479 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1036 Points ∼23% -58%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1554 Points ∼35% -37%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4434 Points ∼100% +79%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (2087 - 2479, n=2)
2283 Points ∼51% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6644, n=143)
2617 Points ∼59% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3188 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2298 Points ∼47% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2311 Points ∼47% -28%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4917 Points ∼100% +54%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (3188 - 3326, n=2)
3257 Points ∼66% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5766, n=489)
2155 Points ∼44% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2433 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
980 Points ∼19% -60%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1530 Points ∼30% -37%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5157 Points ∼100% +112%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (2322 - 2433, n=2)
2378 Points ∼46% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=489)
2042 Points ∼40% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2568 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1134 Points ∼22% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1654 Points ∼32% -36%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5102 Points ∼100% +99%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (2412 - 2568, n=2)
2490 Points ∼49% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8204, n=490)
1896 Points ∼37% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3143 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2348 Points ∼47% -25%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2336 Points ∼47% -26%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4997 Points ∼100% +59%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (3143 - 3362, n=2)
3253 Points ∼65% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5721, n=519)
2065 Points ∼41% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2965 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1668 Points ∼26% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1993 Points ∼31% -33%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6350 Points ∼100% +114%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (2323 - 2965, n=2)
2644 Points ∼42% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=519)
2717 Points ∼43% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3003 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1778 Points ∼30% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2060 Points ∼34% -31%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5990 Points ∼100% +99%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (2412 - 3003, n=2)
2708 Points ∼45% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=519)
2284 Points ∼38% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3114 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2408 Points ∼53% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2217 Points ∼49% -29%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4509 Points ∼100% +45%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (3114 - 3280, n=2)
3197 Points ∼71% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=569)
2043 Points ∼45% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2384 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
967 Points ∼20% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1473 Points ∼30% -38%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4937 Points ∼100% +107%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (2218 - 2384, n=2)
2301 Points ∼47% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=569)
1707 Points ∼35% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
2515 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1114 Points ∼23% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1592 Points ∼33% -37%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4835 Points ∼100% +92%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (2390 - 2515, n=2)
2453 Points ∼51% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7305, n=570)
1632 Points ∼34% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3194 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2378 Points ∼54% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2225 Points ∼50% -30%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4436 Points ∼100% +39%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (3194 - 3267, n=2)
3231 Points ∼73% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=611)
1907 Points ∼43% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3108 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1607 Points ∼26% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2027 Points ∼33% -35%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6111 Points ∼100% +97%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (2219 - 3108, n=2)
2664 Points ∼44% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=610)
2236 Points ∼37% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3127 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1728 Points ∼31% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2068 Points ∼37% -34%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5638 Points ∼100% +80%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (2390 - 3127, n=2)
2759 Points ∼49% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=613)
1929 Points ∼34% -38%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
19084 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
20354 Points ∼85% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
20393 Points ∼85% +7%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
23870 Points ∼100% +25%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (19084 - 22928, n=2)
21006 Points ∼88% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 57583, n=759)
15158 Points ∼64% -21%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
36463 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
24654 Points ∼48% -32%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
25086 Points ∼49% -31%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
51362 Points ∼100% +41%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (36463 - 39137, n=2)
37800 Points ∼74% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=757)
25422 Points ∼49% -30%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
30326 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
23534 Points ∼58% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23866 Points ∼58% -21%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
40895 Points ∼100% +35%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (30326 - 33832, n=2)
32079 Points ∼78% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 110468, n=757)
20073 Points ∼49% -34%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
78 fps ∼57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
36 fps ∼26% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
46 fps ∼34% -41%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
137 fps ∼100% +76%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (78 - 82, n=2)
80 fps ∼58% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=765)
43.3 fps ∼32% -44%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
59 fps ∼98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
33 fps ∼55% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
40 fps ∼67% -32%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +2%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (58 - 59, n=2)
58.5 fps ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=774)
30.3 fps ∼51% -49%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
50 fps ∼57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
19 fps ∼22% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
24 fps ∼27% -52%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
88 fps ∼100% +76%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (49 - 50, n=2)
49.5 fps ∼56% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=670)
25.5 fps ∼29% -49%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
45 fps ∼76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
17 fps ∼29% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼39% -49%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +31%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (42 - 45, n=2)
43.5 fps ∼74% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=678)
21.6 fps ∼37% -52%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
31 fps ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
13 fps ∼23% -58%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
15 fps ∼27% -52%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
56 fps ∼100% +81%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (29 - 31, n=2)
30 fps ∼54% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=533)
20.5 fps ∼37% -34%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
27 fps ∼56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
12 fps ∼25% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼29% -48%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
48 fps ∼100% +78%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (26 - 27, n=2)
26.5 fps ∼55% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=535)
18.8 fps ∼39% -30%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
11 fps ∼52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
4.4 fps ∼21% -60%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5.5 fps ∼26% -50%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
21 fps ∼100% +91%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (6.8 - 11, n=2)
8.9 fps ∼42% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=281)
11.1 fps ∼53% +1%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
6.9 fps ∼49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2.8 fps ∼20% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.5 fps ∼25% -49%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
14 fps ∼100% +103%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (6.9 - 11, n=2)
8.95 fps ∼64% +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=279)
8.02 fps ∼57% +16%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
18 fps ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
7.2 fps ∼22% -60%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.1 fps ∼28% -49%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +83%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (17 - 18, n=2)
17.5 fps ∼53% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=285)
16.5 fps ∼50% -8%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
20 fps ∼54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
8.1 fps ∼22% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼27% -50%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +85%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (19 - 20, n=2)
19.5 fps ∼53% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=284)
19.1 fps ∼52% -4%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
18 fps ∼56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6.9 fps ∼22% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼31% -44%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
32 fps ∼100% +78%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (16 - 18, n=2)
17 fps ∼53% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=458)
13.9 fps ∼43% -23%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
16 fps ∼57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6.1 fps ∼22% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.6 fps ∼31% -46%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
28 fps ∼100% +75%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (14 - 16, n=2)
15 fps ∼54% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=462)
12.3 fps ∼44% -23%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
301404 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
169695 Points ∼41% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
169695 Points ∼41% -44%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
181295 Points ∼44% -40%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
410820 Points ∼100% +36%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (282085 - 301404, n=2)
291745 Points ∼71% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=87)
312805 Points ∼76% +4%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
8.24 (min: 5.77, max: 20.65) fps ∼43%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (18.1 - 18.1, n=2)
9.05 fps ∼47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.73 - 85.6, n=73)
19.2 fps ∼100%
Vulkan Medium Native (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
6.65 (min: 3.4, max: 18.65) fps ∼31%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
 
21.2 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 63, n=64)
16 fps ∼75%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
7.44 (min: 3.6, max: 21.99) fps ∼37%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
 
19.4 fps ∼97%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 71.6, n=62)
19.9 fps ∼100%
VRMark - Amber Room (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3255 Score ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1134 Score ∼35% -65%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (3243 - 3255, n=2)
3249 Score ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7649, n=82)
2609 Score ∼80% -20%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
1339 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
937 Points ∼64% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1462 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (1145 - 1339, n=2)
1242 Points ∼85% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=702)
802 Points ∼55% -40%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3483 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
1881 Points ∼25% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2168 Points ∼28% -38%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
7640 Points ∼100% +119%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (3419 - 3483, n=2)
3451 Points ∼45% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=702)
2393 Points ∼31% -31%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3676 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2808 Points ∼55% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1605 Points ∼31% -56%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5116 Points ∼100% +39%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (3609 - 3676, n=2)
3643 Points ∼71% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8398, n=702)
1775 Points ∼35% -52%
System (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
5632 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
5006 Points ∼59% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4738 Points ∼56% -16%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8456 Points ∼100% +50%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (5632 - 6155, n=2)
5894 Points ∼70% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=702)
3341 Points ∼40% -41%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
realme 6
Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 8192
3135 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 6144
2254 Points ∼48% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
634 Points ∼14% -80%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4689 Points ∼100% +50%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
  (3054 - 3135, n=2)
3095 Points ∼66% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6205, n=702)
1694 Points ∼36% -46%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
realme 6 (Chrome 81)
41.73 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=165)
39.8 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (35.3 - 41.7, n=2)
38.5 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
30.65 Points ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
27.681 Points ∼66% -34%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei Nova 5T (Chrome 74)
109.88 Points ∼100% +56%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (70.5 - 72.1, n=2)
71.3 Points ∼65% +1%
realme 6 (Chrome 81)
70.524 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
51.257 Points ∼47% -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
50.33 Points ∼46% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=594)
45.9 Points ∼42% -35%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=149)
42.7 runs/min ∼100% +24%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (34.4 - 41.6, n=2)
38 runs/min ∼89% +10%
realme 6 (Chrome 81)
34.4 runs/min ∼81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
30.8 runs/min ∼72% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
29.1 runs/min ∼68% -15%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei Nova 5T (Chrome 74)
124 Points ∼100% +170%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=229)
69.6 Points ∼56% +51%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
57 Points ∼46% +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
52 Points ∼42% +13%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (46 - 55, n=2)
50.5 Points ∼41% +10%
realme 6 (Chrome 81)
46 Points ∼37%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei Nova 5T (Chrome 74)
22379 Points ∼100% +49%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (15061 - 15606, n=2)
15334 Points ∼69% +2%
realme 6 (Chrome 81)
15061 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
10194 Points ∼46% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
9405 Points ∼42% -38%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=760)
7613 Points ∼34% -49%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=786)
9952 ms * ∼100% -200%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 (Chrome 78)
4561.76 ms * ∼46% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
4375.1 ms * ∼44% -32%
realme 6 (Chrome 81)
3316 ms * ∼33%
Average Mediatek Helio G90T (3002 - 3316, n=2)
3159 ms * ∼32% +5%
Huawei Nova 5T (Chrome 74)
2059 ms * ∼21% +38%

* ... kleiner is beter

realme 6Xiaomi Redmi Note 8Samsung Galaxy A51Huawei Nova 5TAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-32%
-18%
24%
-3%
-45%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
52.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-17%
60.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
59 (8.4 - 72.4, n=30)
-7%
50.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=504)
-21%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
71.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-15%
73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
74.1 (13.4 - 88.2, n=30)
-12%
68.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=504)
-19%
Random Write 4KB
165.29
91.23
-45%
104.4
-37%
247.05
49%
104 (18.2 - 250, n=56)
-37%
32.2 (0.14 - 319, n=848)
-81%
Random Read 4KB
179.4
84.76
-53%
110.8
-38%
146.23
-18%
141 (96.8 - 179, n=56)
-21%
56.3 (1.59 - 324, n=848)
-69%
Sequential Write 256KB
203.91
160.53
-21%
184.9
-9%
186.43
-9%
229 (182 - 503, n=56)
12%
119 (2.99 - 911, n=848)
-42%
Sequential Read 256KB
524.92
297.65
-43%
496.1
-5%
904.03
72%
761 (427 - 961, n=56)
45%
324 (12.1 - 1802, n=848)
-38%
PUBG
Asphalt 9 Legends
Arena of Valor
Temple Run 2
PUBG
010203040Tooltip
; Smooth; 0.18.0: Ø29.8 (26-31)
; Balanced; 0.18.0: Ø29.9 (26-31)
; HD; 0.18.0: Ø29.7 (19-31)
Temple Run 2
010203040506070Tooltip
; 1.66.2: Ø60.1 (60-61)
Asphalt 9 Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality; 2.2.2a: Ø29.1 (3-31)
; Standard / low; 2.2.2a: Ø29.3 (16-31)
Arena of Valor
010203040506070Tooltip
; 1.34.1.10: Ø54.7 (1-61)
Max. Belasting
 38.9 °C39.6 °C35.8 °C 
 38.5 °C38.4 °C36.4 °C 
 38.1 °C37.9 °C36 °C 
Maximum: 39.6 °C
Gemiddelde: 37.7 °C
34.6 °C35.3 °C36.4 °C
33.8 °C34.6 °C38.2 °C
33.7 °C36.4 °C38.7 °C
Maximum: 38.7 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.7 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  28.2 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.826.82526.225.73123.323.84021.924.7502831.56319.920.98019.122.810019.919.312516.525.516019.637.120017.540.325017.544.431513.95140013.955.250015.862.463015.267.18001473.510001474.4125013.972.7160013.472.7200013.872.2250014.374.831501476.9400014.581.6500014.678.7630014.571.6800014.769.61000015.170.41250015701600014.859.1SPL26.587.4N0.866.3median 14.6median 70Delta11134.927.529.130.525.431.929.427.539.432.827.327.721.622.82421.820.724.519.941.51847.716.854.516.26115.963.913.568.513.970.812.972.11472.414.774.614.175.314.275.314.575.115.474.214.978.914.878.41575.415.377.815.378.815.67115.556.52787.70.973.3median 15.3median 72.11.310.3hearing rangehide median Pink Noiserealme 6Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
realme 6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.13 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.58 / 1.74 / 1.76 Watt
Belasting midlight 4.19 / 6.59 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
realme 6
4300 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Huawei Nova 5T
3750 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G90T
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
3%
-16%
-27%
-13%
-12%
Idle Minimum *
0.58
0.62
-7%
0.9
-55%
0.87
-50%
0.685 (0.58 - 0.79, n=2)
-18%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=859)
-52%
Idle Average *
1.74
1.77
-2%
1.7
2%
2.34
-34%
2.03 (1.74 - 2.32, n=2)
-17%
1.751 (0.6 - 6.2, n=858)
-1%
Idle Maximum *
1.76
1.8
-2%
1.8
-2%
2.4
-36%
2.07 (1.76 - 2.38, n=2)
-18%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=859)
-15%
Load Average *
4.19
3.42
18%
5.2
-24%
4.56
-9%
4.46 (4.19 - 4.72, n=2)
-6%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=853)
2%
Load Maximum *
6.59
6.14
7%
6.6
-0%
6.97
-6%
7.14 (6.59 - 7.68, n=2)
-8%
6.03 (1.2 - 14.2, n=853)
8%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
16h 11min
realme 6
4300 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Huawei Nova 5T
3750 mAh
Batterijduur
-15%
-28%
-20%
Reader / Idle
2139
1689
WiFi v1.3
971
824
-15%
698
-28%
776
-20%
Load
217
289
H.264
859
846

Pro

+ 90-Hz display
+ 64-MP-camera
+ lichtgevoelige frontcamera
+ Widevine niveau 1
+ goede looptijden

Contra

- donker display

Samenvatting - Goed uitgerust voor minder dan €300

Getest: Realme 6. Testmodel geleverd door Realme Germany
Getest: Realme 6. Testmodel geleverd door Realme Germany

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

Voor minder dan €300 is de Realme 6 een bijzonder interessant apparaat. Het glinsterende uiterlijk en de luxueuze camera aan de achterzijde weten niet alleen indruk te maken, maar ook de hardware is oerdegelijk, wat het belangrijkste onderdeel is.

Dankzij de beschikbaarheid van drie geheugenconfiguraties is de Realme 6 beschikbaar voor potentiële kopers met verschillende budgetbeperkingen.

Met verschillende RAM-varianten kunnen gebruikers een extra, belangrijke factor aanpassen om de prijs verder te verlagen: Ons testapparaat is de topconfiguratie met 8 GB RAM en 128 GB ROM en is beschikbaar voor €299,90. De 4 GB/128 GB configuratie kost €269 euro, terwijl het low-end alternatief met 4 GB RAM en 64 GB voor slechts €229 kan worden aangeschaft. Bij aankoop van een van deze modellen krijgen kopers een - voor de prijs - vrij krachtige telefoon die niet alleen goed geschikt is voor gaming, maar ook is uitgerust met een hoge-resolutiecamera die niet teleurstelt.

realme 6 - 30-05-2020 v7
Inge Schwabe

Behuizing
83%
Toetsenbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Aanwijsapparaat
86%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
47 / 70 → 68%
Gewicht
89%
Batterij
91%
Beeldscherm
85%
Gaming-performance
29 / 64 → 45%
Applicatie-performance
70 / 86 → 81%
Temperatuur
90%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
68%
Gemiddelde
75%
81%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Realme 6 Smartphone: 90 Hz Is niet alles
Inge Schwabe, 2020-06- 7 (Update: 2020-06- 7)