Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Smartphone: Een batterijreus met een 90-Hz-scherm

Betaalbare 5G-smartphone. De Moto G 5G Plus is de nieuwste mid-range telefoon van Motorola. De Moto-G-smartphone combineert een enorme 5.000 mAh-batterij met een Snapdragon 765 voor een adviesprijs van iets minder dan 350 euro. We achterhalen of de Motorola-smartphone het kopen waard is in deze recensie van de Moto G 5G Plus.
Marcus Herbrich, 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Moto G Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 8 x 1.8 - 2.3 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Grafische kaart
Qualcomm Adreno 620
Geheugen
4096 MB 
Beeldscherm
6.70 inch 21:9, 2520 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, Capacitief Touchscreen , LTPS, HDR, 90 Hz
Opslag
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 44 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5mm-Klinke, Card Reader: microSD tot 1TB, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Accelerometer, Gyroscoop, Afstandssensor, E-kompas, OTG, Miracast
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 5G: 1/3/7/8/28/38/41/77/78, 4G: 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/20/26/28/32/38/39/40/41/42/43/66, 3G: 1/2/4/5/8, 2G: 0/1 /2/3/5/8, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 9 x 168 x 74
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Besturingssysteem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (ƒ/1,7, 1,6 µm) + 5 MP (ƒ/2,2, 1,12 µm) + 8 MP (ƒ/2,2, 1,12 µm) + 2 MP (ƒ/2,2, 1,75 µm)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (ƒ/2,0, 1,0 µm, Ultra-Wide-Angle) + 8 MP (ƒ/2,2, 1,12 µm)
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Stereo, Toetsenbord: Onscreen, Protective Cover, TurboPower-oplader, USB-C-kabel, QuickStart-handleiding, SIM-tool, Moto UI, 24 Maanden Garantie, Widevine L1, SAR: Hoofd - 0.99 W/kg, Lichaam - 1.50 W/kg, fanless
Gewicht
207 g, Voeding: 39 g
Prijs
350 Euro
Links
Motorola startpagina
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Vergelijkingstoestellen

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Drive
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
80 %
08-2020
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
SD 765, Adreno 620		207 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2520x1080
84 %
08-2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620		192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2340x1080
83 %
08-2020
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
SD 730G, Adreno 618		204 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080
83 %
07-2020
OnePlus Nord
SD 765G, Adreno 620		184 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.44"2440x1080
82 %
02-2020
Samsung Galaxy A71
SD 730, Adreno 618		179 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.70"2400x1080
77 %
06-2020
Oppo A72
SD 665, Adreno 610		192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
Review Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Smartphone
Review Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Smartphone
Review Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Smartphone
Review Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Smartphone
Review Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Smartphone
Review Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Smartphone
Review Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Smartphone
Review Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Smartphone
Review Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Smartphone
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Adreno 620, SD 765, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
666 (646min - 677max) MBit/s ∼100%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 (563min - 668max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (545min - 662max) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Oppo A72
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
347 (330min - 356max) MBit/s ∼52% -48%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
341 (334min - 349max) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
338 (295min - 356max) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=641)
290 MBit/s ∼44% -56%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
668 (618min - 677max) MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Adreno 620, SD 765, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
646 (590min - 656max) MBit/s ∼97%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
563 (275min - 666max) MBit/s ∼84% -13%
Oppo A72
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
330 (284min - 346max) MBit/s ∼49% -49%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
324 (310min - 330max) MBit/s ∼49% -50%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
317 (151min - 367max) MBit/s ∼47% -51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=641)
276 MBit/s ∼41% -57%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø666 (646-677)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø646 (590-656)
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
GPS Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
GPS Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
GPS Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
GPS Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
GPS Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Ultra-wide-angle
Ultra-wide-angle
Main Camera
Main Camera
5x-Zoom
5x-Zoom
8x-Zoom (max)
8x-Zoom (max)

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

HauptkameraHauptkameraLow LightUltraweitwinkel
ColorChecker
26.8 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
32 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
51.3 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
49.1 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
47.9 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: 35.57 ∆E min: 14.19 - max: 51.55 ∆E
ColorChecker
17.8 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
15 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
15 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
13 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: 12.22 ∆E min: 3.58 - max: 19.57 ∆E
450
cd/m²		459
cd/m²		448
cd/m²
459
cd/m²		461
cd/m²		455
cd/m²
484
cd/m²		460
cd/m²		450
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 484 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 458.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.47 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 93 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 461 cd/m²
Contrast: 887:1 (Zwart: 0.52 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.01 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.70		Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.57		Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47		OnePlus Nord
AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.44		Samsung Galaxy A71
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70		Oppo A72
IPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.50
Screen
-2%
18%
-41%
-62%
-156%
Brightness middle
461
584
27%
605
31%
529
15%
629
36%
505
10%
Brightness
458
583
27%
608
33%
531
16%
646
41%
482
5%
Brightness Distribution
93
97
4%
95
2%
94
1%
95
2%
93
0%
Black Level *
0.52
0.55
-6%
Contrast
887
918
3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.01
1.17
-16%
0.84
17%
2.53
-150%
2.7
-167%
6.3
-524%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.1
2.95
-40%
1.8
14%
4.52
-115%
6
-186%
10.1
-381%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.5
1.7
-13%
1.3
13%
1.7
-13%
3
-100%
6.8
-353%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.231 99%
2.211 100%
2.249 98%
2.1 105%
2.29 96%
CCT
6701 97%
6341 103%
6310 103%
6462 101%
6340 103%
8161 80%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

ℹ
De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
   ↔    Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
26 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 15 ms stijging
↘ 11 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (24.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
   ↔    Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
34 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 17 ms stijging
↘ 17 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (38.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 5.3 | Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v8 | BaseMark OS II
Geekbench 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1095 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1293 Points ∼67% +18%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1242 Points ∼65% +13%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
387 Points ∼20% -65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
 
1095 Points ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7400, n=66)
1918 Points ∼100% +75%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1022 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1183 Points ∼71% +16%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1169 Points ∼70% +14%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
453 Points ∼27% -56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
 
1022 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6252, n=69)
1678 Points ∼100% +64%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
903 Points ∼56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
 
977 Points ∼60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=67)
1615 Points ∼100%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1090 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
861 Points ∼50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
 
1054 Points ∼61%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=62)
1737 Points ∼100%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1954 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1908 Points ∼97% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1690 Points ∼86% -14%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1966 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1647 Points ∼84% -16%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1256 Points ∼64% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (1869 - 1954, n=2)
1912 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=170)
1937 Points ∼99% -1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
596 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
673 Points ∼100% +13%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
547 Points ∼81% -8%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
611 Points ∼91% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
542 Points ∼81% -9%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
309 Points ∼46% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (589 - 596, n=2)
593 Points ∼88% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (63 - 1604, n=170)
560 Points ∼83% -6%
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
8215 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8968 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
 
8215 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=365)
4925 Points ∼55% -40%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
7832 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7765 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
 
7832 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 14476, n=432)
5053 Points ∼65% -35%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2785 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2863 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
 
2785 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4970, n=432)
1545 Points ∼54% -45%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
8756 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7786 Points ∼68% -11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7628 Points ∼67% -13%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9427 Points ∼82% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7773 Points ∼68% -11%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
11432 Points ∼100% +31%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (8336 - 8756, n=2)
8546 Points ∼75% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=567)
6083 Points ∼53% -31%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
9914 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8730 Points ∼80% -12%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
8941 Points ∼82% -10%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
10876 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
8885 Points ∼82% -10%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7651 Points ∼70% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (9914 - 10045, n=2)
9980 Points ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=716)
6702 Points ∼62% -32%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2802 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2893 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2686 Points ∼93% -4%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2867 Points ∼99% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2445 Points ∼85% -13%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2287 Points ∼79% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (2802 - 2810, n=2)
2806 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=219)
2636 Points ∼91% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2844 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3198 Points ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2143 Points ∼67% -25%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3185 Points ∼100% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1731 Points ∼54% -39%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
981 Points ∼31% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (2786 - 2844, n=2)
2815 Points ∼88% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=219)
3011 Points ∼94% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2814 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3130 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2244 Points ∼72% -20%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3108 Points ∼99% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1851 Points ∼59% -34%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1123 Points ∼36% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (2791 - 2814, n=2)
2803 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=219)
2656 Points ∼85% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3457 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3495 Points ∼99% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3058 Points ∼86% -12%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3544 Points ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2827 Points ∼80% -18%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2154 Points ∼61% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (3442 - 3457, n=2)
3450 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=576)
2290 Points ∼65% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3165 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3589 Points ∼100% +13%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2466 Points ∼69% -22%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3556 Points ∼99% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2085 Points ∼58% -34%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
987 Points ∼28% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (3165 - 3165, n=2)
3165 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=576)
2288 Points ∼64% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3236 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3605 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2577 Points ∼71% -20%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3553 Points ∼99% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2214 Points ∼61% -32%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1097 Points ∼30% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (3223 - 3236, n=2)
3230 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=577)
2113 Points ∼59% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3512 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3492 Points ∼98% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3134 Points ∼88% -11%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3555 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2702 Points ∼76% -23%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2199 Points ∼62% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (3449 - 3512, n=2)
3481 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=607)
2208 Points ∼62% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4865 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5335 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3751 Points ∼70% -23%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5357 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3101 Points ∼58% -36%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1653 Points ∼31% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (4829 - 4865, n=2)
4847 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 22052, n=607)
3140 Points ∼59% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4484 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4893 Points ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3594 Points ∼73% -20%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4815 Points ∼98% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3002 Points ∼61% -33%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1765 Points ∼36% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (4435 - 4484, n=2)
4460 Points ∼91% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=607)
2578 Points ∼53% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3445 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3425 Points ∼98% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3257 Points ∼93% -5%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3503 Points ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3210 Points ∼92% -7%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2246 Points ∼64% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (3435 - 3445, n=2)
3440 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=656)
2165 Points ∼62% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
2963 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3321 Points ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2298 Points ∼69% -22%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3284 Points ∼99% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2296 Points ∼69% -23%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
980 Points ∼30% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (2897 - 2963, n=2)
2930 Points ∼88% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=656)
1906 Points ∼57% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3015 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3346 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2459 Points ∼73% -18%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3330 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2451 Points ∼73% -19%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1134 Points ∼34% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (3001 - 3015, n=2)
3008 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=657)
1809 Points ∼54% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3498 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3452 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3294 Points ∼94% -6%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3476 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2792 Points ∼80% -20%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2282 Points ∼65% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (3435 - 3498, n=2)
3467 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5301, n=698)
2038 Points ∼58% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4654 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5832 Points ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3610 Points ∼62% -22%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5171 Points ∼89% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2999 Points ∼51% -36%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1564 Points ∼27% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (4654 - 4671, n=2)
4663 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=697)
2545 Points ∼44% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4401 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4693 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3594 Points ∼77% -18%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4665 Points ∼99% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2950 Points ∼63% -33%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1675 Points ∼36% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (4325 - 4401, n=2)
4363 Points ∼93% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=700)
2173 Points ∼46% -51%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
20156 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
20429 Points ∼93% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
20767 Points ∼95% +3%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21016 Points ∼96% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
21898 Points ∼100% +9%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
17865 Points ∼82% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (20156 - 20185, n=2)
20171 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=842)
15957 Points ∼73% -21%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
62756 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
69506 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
53194 Points ∼77% -15%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69285 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
52600 Points ∼76% -16%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24321 Points ∼35% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (62756 - 62819, n=2)
62788 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 224130, n=840)
29153 Points ∼42% -54%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
42735 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
45304 Points ∼99% +6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39491 Points ∼86% -8%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
45872 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
40105 Points ∼87% -6%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
22445 Points ∼49% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (42735 - 42752, n=2)
42744 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=840)
22274 Points ∼49% -48%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
86 fps ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
95 fps ∼98% +10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
83 fps ∼86% -3%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
97 fps ∼100% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps ∼87% -2%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
35 fps ∼36% -59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (86 - 87, n=2)
86.5 fps ∼89% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=834)
48.7 fps ∼50% -43%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
75 fps ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
60 fps ∼78% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼78% -20%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
60 fps ∼78% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
59 fps ∼77% -21%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
32 fps ∼42% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (75 - 78, n=2)
76.5 fps ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 142, n=843)
32.5 fps ∼42% -57%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
50 fps ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
49 fps ∼89% -2%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼75% -18%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
55 fps ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼75% -18%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼35% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (50 - 50, n=2)
50 fps ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 180, n=739)
28.9 fps ∼53% -42%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
44 fps ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
55 fps ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
39 fps ∼71% -11%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼91% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
37 fps ∼67% -16%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
17 fps ∼31% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (44 - 48, n=2)
46 fps ∼84% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 117, n=747)
23.8 fps ∼43% -46%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
33 fps ∼87%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +15%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼79% -9%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼100% +15%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼79% -9%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼34% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (33 - 33, n=2)
33 fps ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=602)
23.1 fps ∼61% -30%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
29 fps ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
33 fps ∼97% +14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼85% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼79% -7%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
11 fps ∼32% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (29 - 32, n=2)
30.5 fps ∼90% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=604)
20.6 fps ∼61% -29%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
11 fps ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
13 fps ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼85% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼100% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼77% -9%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4 fps ∼31% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (11 - 12, n=2)
11.5 fps ∼88% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=366)
11.8 fps ∼91% +7%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
7.5 fps ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.5 fps ∼100% +13%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6.7 fps ∼79% -11%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼100% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6.7 fps ∼79% -11%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.7 fps ∼32% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (7.5 - 7.5, n=2)
7.5 fps ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=364)
8.23 fps ∼97% +10%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
18 fps ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼81% -6%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼76% -11%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6.2 fps ∼30% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (18 - 20, n=2)
19 fps ∼90% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=370)
17.6 fps ∼84% -2%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
21 fps ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼75% -14%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼100% +14%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼75% -14%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.8 fps ∼33% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (21 - 21, n=2)
21 fps ∼88% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=370)
20.1 fps ∼84% -4%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
19 fps ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼81% -11%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼100% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼81% -11%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6.9 fps ∼33% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (19 - 19, n=2)
19 fps ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 75, n=527)
15.4 fps ∼73% -19%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
16 fps ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps ∼95% +13%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼89% +6%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼79% -6%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6 fps ∼32% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (16 - 18, n=2)
17 fps ∼89% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=531)
13.6 fps ∼72% -15%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
279244 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
318669 Points ∼96% +14%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
273255 Points ∼82% -2%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
332074 Points ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
247507 Points ∼75% -11%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
177251 Points ∼53% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (279244 - 304120, n=2)
291682 Points ∼88% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 624727, n=152)
325323 Points ∼98% +17%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
1456 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1462 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1365 Points ∼93% -6%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1441 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1103 Points ∼75% -24%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1231 Points ∼84% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (1399 - 1456, n=2)
1428 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 2169, n=764)
843 Points ∼58% -42%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4697 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5201 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3864 Points ∼74% -18%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5203 Points ∼100% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3175 Points ∼61% -32%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1897 Points ∼36% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (4681 - 4697, n=2)
4689 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=764)
2615 Points ∼50% -44%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
4775 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5683 Points ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3752 Points ∼66% -21%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5296 Points ∼93% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3466 Points ∼61% -27%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2451 Points ∼43% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (4528 - 4775, n=2)
4652 Points ∼82% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=764)
1976 Points ∼35% -59%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
6745 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6069 Points ∼89% -10%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6305 Points ∼93% -7%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6801 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6426 Points ∼94% -5%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4787 Points ∼70% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (6612 - 6745, n=2)
6679 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=764)
3587 Points ∼53% -47%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 4096
3845 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4094 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3342 Points ∼82% -13%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4054 Points ∼99% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A71
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2972 Points ∼73% -23%
Oppo A72
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2232 Points ∼55% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  (3742 - 3845, n=2)
3794 Points ∼93% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6402, n=764)
1844 Points ∼45% -52%
Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
58.665 Points ∼100% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.232 Points ∼86% +3%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
48.568 Points ∼83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (48.3 - 48.6, n=2)
48.5 Points ∼83% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
46.148 Points ∼79% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=226)
42.9 Points ∼73% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
36.578 Points ∼62% -25%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)
22.887 Points ∼39% -53%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
94.481 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
93.643 Points ∼99% +6%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
88.457 Points ∼94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (87.8 - 88.5, n=2)
88.1 Points ∼93% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
82.347 Points ∼87% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
65.293 Points ∼69% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=659)
50.4 Points ∼53% -43%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
OnePlus Nord (Chome 84)
53.6 runs/min ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.7 runs/min ∼95% +12%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
45.2 runs/min ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=205)
45.2 runs/min ∼84% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
40.4 runs/min ∼75% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (26.8 - 45.2, n=2)
36 runs/min ∼67% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
32.8 runs/min ∼61% -27%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)
28.2 runs/min ∼53% -38%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
101 Points ∼100% +29%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
78 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
76 Points ∼75% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (72 - 78, n=2)
75 Points ∼74% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=297)
71.1 Points ∼70% -9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
70 Points ∼69% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
60 Points ∼59% -23%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)
50 Points ∼50% -36%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
19143 Points ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
18556 Points ∼97% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (16302 - 17700, n=2)
17001 Points ∼89% +4%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
16302 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
16197 Points ∼85% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
12771 Points ∼67% -22%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)
9345 Points ∼49% -43%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=829)
8416 Points ∼44% -48%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=855)
9488 ms * ∼100% -243%
Oppo A72 (Chrome 83)
4487.2 ms * ∼47% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136)
3435.5 ms * ∼36% -24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
2940.5 ms * ∼31% -6%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
2834.8 ms * ∼30% -3%
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83)
2764.2 ms * ∼29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (2754 - 2764, n=2)
2759 ms * ∼29% -0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
2602.2 ms * ∼27% +6%

* ... kleiner is beter

Motorola Moto G 5G PlusXiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5GXiaomi Mi Note 10 LiteOnePlus NordSamsung Galaxy A71Oppo A72Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
51%
-6%
38%
-16%
-16%
-17%
-41%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
57.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-13%
31.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-53%
51.8 (17.1 - 71.9, n=32)
-21%
51.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=564)
-21%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
87.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-16%
37.76 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-57%
68.1 (18 - 87.1, n=32)
-22%
69.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=564)
-20%
Random Write 4KB
119.3
138.47
16%
125.75
5%
104.5
-12%
109.57
-8%
152.9
28%
68.8 (8.77 - 165, n=43)
-42%
40.2 (0.14 - 319, n=935)
-66%
Random Read 4KB
138.14
156.45
13%
134.57
-3%
126.7
-8%
112.25
-19%
135.91
-2%
133 (78.2 - 173, n=43)
-4%
63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=935)
-54%
Sequential Write 256KB
180.21
476.87
165%
213.22
18%
473.1
163%
192.38
7%
234.61
30%
199 (133 - 388, n=43)
10%
139 (2.99 - 1321, n=935)
-23%
Sequential Read 256KB
885.34
979.54
11%
501.29
-43%
955.5
8%
493.04
-44%
504.32
-43%
703 (476 - 895, n=43)
-21%
363 (12.1 - 2037, n=935)
-59%
PUBG mobile
01020304050Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø39.8 (33-41)
; Balanced: Ø40 (39-41)
; HD: Ø29.9 (25-31)
Asphalt 9 Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø21.3 (5-31)
; Standard / low: Ø28.8 (18-31)
Max. Belasting
 43.9 °C42.7 °C41.8 °C 
 44.1 °C41.4 °C41.8 °C 
 42.9 °C41.4 °C42.2 °C 
Maximum: 44.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 42.5 °C
36.2 °C40.5 °C39.1 °C
37 °C40.7 °C42.9 °C
38.6 °C41 °C42.1 °C
Maximum: 42.9 °C
Gemiddelde: 39.8 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  40.5 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2047.246.6253941.53134.336.74039.337.45042.143.36331.733.58026.325.710026.425.912525.633.316022.144.320019.348.525018.952.931516.558.74001662.950014.366.763015.769.380015.274.5100013.777.4125011.776.216001274.6200012.466.6250011.165.6315011.266.3400011.870.2500012.968.7630013.775.6800014.178.8100001481.4125001371.21600011.461SPL71.76863.425.986.2N27.222.415.80.866.1median 14median 66.7Delta2.610.536.845.839.944.331.935.538.936.643.740.929.830.325.926.526.333.324.938.521.642.21942.718.94618.15416.66116.265.814.969.71568.715.671.914.972.614.970.115.673.414.671.314.268.114.16514.46114.665.614.968.615.268.415.457.115.756.666.36470.627.581.519.715.825.3150.4median 15.4median 65.62.18.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G 5G PlusXiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 1.5 / 2.1 / 2.9 Watt
Belasting midlight 6.7 / 9.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh		Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260 mAh		OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A71
4500 mAh		Oppo A72
5000 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
10%
42%
19%
38%
33%
15%
32%
Idle Minimum *
1.5
1.5
-0%
0.8
47%
1.8
-20%
0.63
58%
0.7
53%
1.25 (1 - 1.5, n=2)
17%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=926)
41%
Idle Average *
2.1
2.2
-5%
1.1
48%
2.1
-0%
1.49
29%
1.97
6%
1.75 (1.4 - 2.1, n=2)
17%
1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=925)
16%
Idle Maximum *
2.9
2.9
-0%
1.8
38%
2.3
21%
1.51
48%
1.98
32%
2.45 (2 - 2.9, n=2)
16%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=926)
30%
Load Average *
6.7
4.4
34%
3.7
45%
3.4
49%
4.62
31%
3.83
43%
5.75 (4.8 - 6.7, n=2)
14%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=920)
39%
Load Maximum *
9.2
7.2
22%
6.1
34%
5.2
43%
7.11
23%
6.2
33%
8.25 (7.3 - 9.2, n=2)
10%
6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=920)
33%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
25h 49min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 41min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 12min
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh		Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite
5260 mAh		OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A71
4500 mAh		Oppo A72
5000 mAh
Batterijduur
56%
59%
28%
31%
11%
Reader / Idle
1549
1683
9%
2249
45%
2003
29%
2164
40%
H.264
581
1403
141%
1370
136%
1064
83%
1164
100%
WiFi v1.3
914
884
-3%
1095
20%
869
-5%
815
-11%
1018
11%
Load
252
448
78%
337
34%
261
4%
242
-4%

Pro

+ goed gekalibreerd scherm
+ lange batterijduur
+ snelle WiFi
+ 90-Hz-scherm
+ veel LTE-frequenties
+ 5G
+ krachtige SoC...

Contra

- ...met zwakke punten bij dagelijks gebruik
- gaming-prestaties
- haptische eigenschappen
- camera's

Conclusie - Niet slecht, niet geweldig

Getest: de Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: Testtoestel voorzien door Motorola Germany.
Getest: de Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: Testtoestel voorzien door Motorola Germany.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De Motorola Moto G 5G Plus biedt zeer goede hardware gecombineerd met een lange batterijduur en een krachtige Snapdragon 765 SoC. Er valt echter genoeg te bekritiseren over de nieuwste protégé uit de Moto G-serie, ondanks zijn lage prijs van zo'n 350 euro

De vormgeving is zeker een kwestie van smaak, maar toch vinden we de dubbele punch-hole toch een beetje jammer, vooral omdat de kwaliteit van de ultragroothoek-selfiecamera de tweede lens overbodig maakt. Ook de overige cameramodules scoren wat ondergemiddeld, zelfs voor deze prijsklasse. De haptiek wordt enigszins tegengewerkt door de plastic elementen van de telefoon en de zeer sterke behuizing, die nodig is vanwege de gigantische batterij van 5.000 mAh. De batterijduur rechtvaardigt de grote batterijcapaciteit niet - we zien nog (veel) ruimte voor optimalisatie op het gebied van energiebeheer.

De Moto G 5G Plus blijkt in onze test een degelijke mid-range smartphone te zijn. Er zijn echter een paar zwakke punten die de algemene indruk van de Motorola-telefoon verpesten.

De inconsistente systeemsnelheid is een beetje verrassend. In het dagelijks leven zijn de prestaties bevredigend, en dankzij het 90Hz-scherm is de bediening lekker soepel, maar in combinatie met slechts 4 GB RAM heeft de Snapdragon 765 in ons testtoestel ongewoon vaak last van haperingen - de gaming-prestaties van de Qualcomm SoC in de Moto G 5G Plus zijn verbazingwekkend slecht, vooral omdat het de Adreno als GPU gebruikt.

Motorola Moto G 5G Plus - 10-12-2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Behuizing
80%
Toetsenbord
68 / 75 → 91%
Aanwijsapparaat
89%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
53 / 70 → 76%
Gewicht
88%
Batterij
87%
Beeldscherm
89%
Gaming-performance
33 / 64 → 52%
Applicatie-performance
72 / 86 → 83%
Temperatuur
86%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
71 / 90 → 78%
Camera
59%
Gemiddelde
75%
80%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Motorola Moto G 5G Plus Smartphone: Een batterijreus met een 90-Hz-scherm
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-08-22 (Update: 2020-08-22)