Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Lenovo Moto C Smartphone

Marcus Herbrich, 01-09-2017

Nieuwe standaard? De Chinese fabrikant Lenovo probeert met de nieuwe C serie het low-budget segment van de smartphonemarkt te veroveren. Lees hier of dit gelukt is.

Lenovo Moto C (Moto C Serie)
Processor
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-T720
Geheugen
1024 MB 
Beeldscherm
5 inch 16:9, 854x480 pixel 196 PPI, capacitief, LCD, TFT, capacitief, glimmend: ja
Opslag
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.4 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5 mm audiopoort, Card Reader: microSD tot 32 GB, Sensoren: accelerometer, Miracast
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM / GPRS / EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz) UMTS / HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz) 4G LTE (1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 9 x 145.5 x 73.6
Batterij
2350 mAh Lithium-Polymer, removeable
Besturingssysteem
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix ƒ / 2.4 diafragma, 1.4 µm 74° lens, fixed focus, LED flits, Burst Mode, Panorama, HDR video: 720p (30 fps), beeldverwerking
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix f / 2.8 diafragma, 1.0 µm 63° lens, fixed focus, LED flits, Burst Mode, HDR beeldverwerking
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: mono, Toetsenbord: virtueel, modulaire stroomadapter, USB kabel, Lenovo UI, SAR: 0.644 W/kg (head) , fanless
Gewicht
154 g
Prijs
85 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
394 MBit/s ∼100% +802%
Lenovo C2
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
50.5 MBit/s ∼13% +16%
ZTE Blade A510
Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s ∼12% +11%
Lenovo Moto C
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
43.7 MBit/s ∼11%
Gretel A9
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
42.3 MBit/s ∼11% -3%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HTC U11
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
639 MBit/s ∼100% +1254%
Lenovo C2
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 8 GB eMMC Flash
53.3 MBit/s ∼8% +13%
Gretel A9
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.4 MBit/s ∼8% +9%
ZTE Blade A510
Mali-T720, MT6735P, 8 GB eMMC Flash
47.9 MBit/s ∼7% +1%
Lenovo Moto C
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.2 MBit/s ∼7%
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Lenovo Moto C
GPS test Lenovo Moto C
GPS test Lenovo Moto C

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
342
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 371 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 355.3 cd/m² Minimum: 6.34 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 92 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 364 cd/m²
Contrast: 1174:1 (Zwart: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 12.7 | - Ø
89.5% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.04
Lenovo Moto C
TFT, 854x480, 5
ZTE Blade A510
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Huawei Y5 II
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Lenovo C2
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Gretel A9
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Ulefone Metal
IPS, 1280x720, 5
HTC U11
Super LCD5, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
5%
-12%
-24%
17%
3%
-12%
34%
Brightness
355
524
48%
349
-2%
443
25%
449
26%
370
4%
315
-11%
472
33%
Brightness Distribution
92
94
2%
89
-3%
90
-2%
92
0%
90
-2%
87
-5%
90
-2%
Black Level *
0.31
0.62
-100%
0.65
-110%
0.84
-171%
0.35
-13%
0.39
-26%
0.56
-81%
0.33
-6%
Contrast
1174
852
-27%
529
-55%
554
-53%
1309
11%
974
-17%
557
-53%
1461
24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
10.4
5.2
50%
5.8
44%
7.8
25%
6.5
37%
8
23%
6.8
35%
3.2
69%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
12.7
5.7
55%
5.7
55%
8.4
34%
7.7
39%
8.5
33%
7.1
44%
2.2
83%
Gamma
2.04 118%
1.99 121%
2.1 114%
2.07 116%
2.15 112%
2.8 86%
2.77 87%
2.22 108%
CCT
12904 50%
6631 98%
7792 83%
8438 77%
8518 76%
8337 78%
7402 88%
6581 99%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 57 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 6262 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
86 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 66 ms stijging
↘ 18 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (26.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
94 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 52 ms stijging
↘ 42 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 99 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (42.8 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Lenovo Moto C
25338 Points ∼11%
ZTE Blade A510
24338 Points ∼11% -4%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
23657 Points ∼10% -7%
Huawei Y5 II
23795 Points ∼10% -6%
Lenovo C2
23825 Points ∼10% -6%
Gretel A9
29237 Points ∼13% +15%
Ulefone Metal
37103 Points ∼16% +46%
HTC U11
175032 Points ∼77% +591%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Lenovo Moto C
2313 Points ∼34%
ZTE Blade A510
2109 Points ∼31% -9%
Gretel A9
2436 Points ∼36% +5%
HTC U11
6828 Points ∼100% +195%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Lenovo Moto C
2877 Points ∼35%
ZTE Blade A510
2675 Points ∼32% -7%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2807 Points ∼34% -2%
Huawei Y5 II
3237 Points ∼39% +13%
Lenovo C2
1908 Points ∼23% -34%
Gretel A9
3293 Points ∼40% +14%
Ulefone Metal
4079 Points ∼49% +42%
HTC U11
8295 Points ∼100% +188%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Lenovo Moto C
534 Points ∼35%
ZTE Blade A510
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
9 Points ∼1% -98%
Huawei Y5 II
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Lenovo C2
9 Points ∼1% -98%
Gretel A9
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Ulefone Metal
10 Points ∼1% -98%
HTC U11
1221 Points ∼79% +129%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Lenovo Moto C
177 Points ∼2%
ZTE Blade A510
174 Points ∼2% -2%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
175 Points ∼2% -1%
Huawei Y5 II
283 Points ∼3% +60%
Lenovo C2
177 Points ∼2% 0%
Gretel A9
209 Points ∼2% +18%
Ulefone Metal
433 Points ∼5% +145%
HTC U11
5976 Points ∼69% +3276%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Lenovo Moto C
419 Points ∼9%
ZTE Blade A510
285 Points ∼6% -32%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
354 Points ∼8% -16%
Huawei Y5 II
375 Points ∼8% -11%
Lenovo C2
332 Points ∼8% -21%
Gretel A9
468 Points ∼11% +12%
Ulefone Metal
802 Points ∼18% +91%
HTC U11
2085 Points ∼47% +398%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Lenovo Moto C
883 Points ∼13%
ZTE Blade A510
829 Points ∼13% -6%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
838 Points ∼13% -5%
Huawei Y5 II
1094 Points ∼17% +24%
Lenovo C2
826 Points ∼13% -6%
Gretel A9
1030 Points ∼16% +17%
Ulefone Metal
1691 Points ∼26% +92%
HTC U11
5570 Points ∼85% +531%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Lenovo Moto C
432 Points ∼11%
ZTE Blade A510
141 Points ∼4% -67%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
148 Points ∼4% -66%
Huawei Y5 II
183 Points ∼5% -58%
Lenovo C2
147 Points ∼4% -66%
Gretel A9
176 Points ∼5% -59%
Ulefone Metal
273 Points ∼7% -37%
HTC U11
3034 Points ∼80% +602%
Geekbench 4.1
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Lenovo Moto C
1254 Points ∼7%
Gretel A9
1468 Points ∼8% +17%
HTC U11
6443 Points ∼35% +414%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Lenovo Moto C
450 Points ∼9%
Gretel A9
537 Points ∼11% +19%
HTC U11
1906 Points ∼39% +324%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Lenovo Moto C
7209 Points ∼10%
ZTE Blade A510
7025 Points ∼10% -3%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
6902 Points ∼10% -4%
Huawei Y5 II
Points ∼0% -100%
Gretel A9
8339 Points ∼12% +16%
Ulefone Metal
10371 Points ∼14% +44%
HTC U11
20140 Points ∼28% +179%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Lenovo Moto C
2706 Points ∼1%
ZTE Blade A510
2682 Points ∼1% -1%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2681 Points ∼1% -1%
Huawei Y5 II
Points ∼0% -100%
Gretel A9
3235 Points ∼1% +20%
Ulefone Metal
6469 Points ∼1% +139%
HTC U11
55725 Points ∼12% +1959%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Lenovo Moto C
3142 Points ∼2%
ZTE Blade A510
3109 Points ∼2% -1%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
3103 Points ∼2% -1%
Huawei Y5 II
Points ∼0% -100%
Lenovo C2
Points ∼0% -100%
Gretel A9
3744 Points ∼2% +19%
Ulefone Metal
7059 Points ∼4% +125%
HTC U11
40014 Points ∼20% +1174%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Lenovo Moto C
5.1 fps ∼0%
ZTE Blade A510
4.9 fps ∼0% -4%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
8.7 fps ∼1% +71%
Huawei Y5 II
8.4 fps ∼1% +65%
Lenovo C2
5 fps ∼0% -2%
Gretel A9
6 fps ∼0% +18%
Ulefone Metal
19 fps ∼1% +273%
HTC U11
91 fps ∼7% +1684%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Lenovo Moto C
13 fps ∼3%
ZTE Blade A510
8.5 fps ∼2% -35%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
4.9 fps ∼1% -62%
Huawei Y5 II
15 fps ∼3% +15%
Lenovo C2
8.5 fps ∼2% -35%
Gretel A9
10 fps ∼2% -23%
Ulefone Metal
12 fps ∼3% -8%
HTC U11
58 fps ∼13% +346%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Lenovo Moto C
1.6 fps ∼0%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
3.6 fps ∼1% +125%
Huawei Y5 II
fps ∼0% -100%
Lenovo C2
fps ∼0% -100%
Gretel A9
2.2 fps ∼0% +38%
Ulefone Metal
2.9 fps ∼1% +81%
HTC U11
51 fps ∼9% +3088%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Lenovo Moto C
7.8 fps ∼2%
ZTE Blade A510
3.5 fps ∼1% -55%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1.2 fps ∼0% -85%
Huawei Y5 II
6.1 fps ∼2% -22%
Lenovo C2
3.7 fps ∼1% -53%
Gretel A9
4.5 fps ∼1% -42%
Ulefone Metal
6.4 fps ∼2% -18%
HTC U11
29 fps ∼8% +272%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Lenovo Moto C
5.5 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade A510
1.1 fps ∼0% -80%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2.7 fps ∼1% -51%
Huawei Y5 II
fps ∼0% -100%
Lenovo C2
1.2 fps ∼0% -78%
Gretel A9
1.4 fps ∼0% -75%
Ulefone Metal
8.9 fps ∼2% +62%
HTC U11
33 fps ∼8% +500%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Lenovo Moto C
1.2 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade A510
2.5 fps ∼1% +108%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
1.2 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei Y5 II
fps ∼0% -100%
Lenovo C2
2.7 fps ∼2% +125%
Gretel A9
3.2 fps ∼2% +167%
Ulefone Metal
4.5 fps ∼3% +275%
HTC U11
15 fps ∼9% +1150%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sorteer op waarde)
Lenovo Moto C
36.6 fps ∼59%
HTC U11
60 fps ∼97% +64%

Legende

 
Lenovo Moto C Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade A510 Mediatek MT6735P, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Archos 50 Platinum 4G Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y5 II Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo C2 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gretel A9 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Metal Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
69.51 Points ∼100% +495%
Huawei Y5 II (Chrome 50)
18.47 Points ∼27% +58%
Ulefone Metal (Chrome Version 52)
17.831 Points ∼26% +53%
Gretel A9 (Chrome 58)
16.2 Points ∼23% +39%
Lenovo C2 (Chrome 55)
13.502 Points ∼19% +16%
ZTE Blade A510 (Chrome Version 56)
12.784 Points ∼18% +9%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G (Chrome Browser Version 52)
12.755 Points ∼18% +9%
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60)
11.676 Points ∼17%
Octane V2 - Total Score
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
11781 Points ∼100% +581%
Ulefone Metal (Chrome Version 52)
2738 Points ∼23% +58%
Huawei Y5 II (Chrome 50)
2707 Points ∼23% +56%
Gretel A9 (Chrome 58)
2392 Points ∼20% +38%
Lenovo C2 (Chrome 55)
2159 Points ∼18% +25%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G (Chrome Browser Version 52)
2122 Points ∼18% +23%
ZTE Blade A510 (Chrome Version 56)
2102 Points ∼18% +22%
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60)
1730 Points ∼15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60)
19879.3 ms * ∼100%
Archos 50 Platinum 4G (Chrome Browser Version 52)
19092.2 ms * ∼96% +4%
ZTE Blade A510 (Chrome Version 56)
17364.1 ms * ∼87% +13%
Lenovo C2 (Chrome 55)
16585 ms * ∼83% +17%
Gretel A9 (Chrome 58)
15146 ms * ∼76% +24%
Ulefone Metal (Chrome Version 52)
13397.3 ms * ∼67% +33%
Huawei Y5 II (Chrome 50)
12505 ms * ∼63% +37%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
2760.3 ms * ∼14% +86%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
162 Points ∼100% +315%
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60)
39 Points ∼24%

* ... kleiner is beter

Lenovo Moto CZTE Blade A510Archos 50 Platinum 4GHuawei Y5 IILenovo C2Gretel A9Ulefone MetalHTC U11
AndroBench 3-5
-9%
-2%
23%
-11%
18%
73%
406%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
10.7
16.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
54%
15.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
46%
18.03 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
69%
16.1
50%
14.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
38%
27.6
158%
46.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
332%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
13.5
25.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
89%
31.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
136%
29.47 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
118%
24.2
79%
23.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
77%
49.6
267%
68.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
410%
Random Write 4KB
10.9
4.69
-57%
4.35
-60%
6
-45%
4.7
-57%
10.1
-7%
7.87
-28%
79.97
634%
Random Read 4KB
18.37
14.03
-24%
14.31
-22%
27.3
49%
14.5
-21%
18.1
-1%
22.18
21%
91.45
398%
Sequential Write 256KB
44.55
9.94
-78%
7.56
-83%
21.6
-52%
8
-82%
44.5
0%
39.91
-10%
206.41
363%
Sequential Read 256KB
179.28
111.91
-38%
125.37
-30%
173.3
-3%
120.7
-33%
176.2
-2%
228.84
28%
717.33
300%
Dead Trigger 2
 InstellingenWaarde
 high29 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InstellingenWaarde
 high12 fps
 very low22 fps
Max. Belasting
 31.1 °C29.9 °C29.4 °C 
 31.9 °C30.2 °C30 °C 
 32.3 °C30.3 °C30 °C 
Maximum: 32.3 °C
Gemiddelde: 30.6 °C
29.4 °C30.9 °C32.1 °C
29.4 °C31.3 °C33.1 °C
29.6 °C31.2 °C34.4 °C
Maximum: 34.4 °C
Gemiddelde: 31.3 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  32.6 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.630.832.62528.730.428.73128.329.828.34031.932.731.9502830.9286327.728.727.78026.232.126.210026.334.126.312532.628.832.616025.923.725.92003321.13325040.12040.131547.819.647.840054.32254.350061.223.661.26306718.46780072.217.872.2100073.718.773.7125072.717.672.7160073.216.373.2200071.616.571.6250070.416.470.4315068.916.268.940007016.170500070.51670.5630072.216.272.2800075.616.175.61000075.11675.1125006815.8681600055.415.955.4SPL83.729.983.7N57.31.457.3median 68.9Lenovo Moto Cmedian 17.6median 68.9Delta12.22.912.231.636.725.435.425.33932.935.233.633.731.635.428.434.9272720.823.8222421.322.820.824.621.222.219.425.419.533.417.746.617.960.617.868.217.369.317.47216.773.717.268.418.268.317.969.417.667.517.756.217.852.917.95818.156.718.2403080.31.338.2median 17.9ZTE Blade A510median 56.21.319.432.441.331.337.831.735.42634.939.440.336.232.928.632.525.424.321.323.723.322.422.525.822.426.221.336.518.444.417.55617.560.817.269.516.870.117.372.817.472.316.672.217.368.717.665.417.667.117.76717.467.817.769.217.968.618.162.718.151.329.881.21.346.6median 17.7Archos 50 Platinum 4Gmedian 65.41.614.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Lenovo Moto C audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

ZTE Blade A510 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.26 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | very high mids - on average 15.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (44.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Archos 50 Platinum 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.17 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Moto C
2350 mAh
Lenovo Moto C Plus
4000 mAh
ZTE Blade A510
2200 mAh
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2200 mAh
Huawei Y5 II
2200 mAh
Lenovo C2
2750 mAh
Gretel A9
2300 mAh
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.61
0.59
0.54
0.71
0.77
1.41
0.73
Idle Average *
1.87
1.75
1.68
1.58
1.62
1.99
2.46
1.96
Idle Maximum *
1.89
1.83
1.79
1.7
1.64
2.2
2.83
1.98
Load Average *
2.18
4.49
4.22
2.98
3.24
4.99
5.15
4.82
Load Maximum *
3.61
5.14
4.26
4.98
3.36
5.14
7.05
7.15

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
19h 19min
Surfen met WLAN v1.3
8h 37min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 49min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 38min
Lenovo Moto C
2350 mAh
ZTE Blade A510
2200 mAh
Archos 50 Platinum 4G
2200 mAh
Huawei Y5 II
2200 mAh
Lenovo C2
2750 mAh
Gretel A9
2300 mAh
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
Batterijduur
-20%
-26%
-6%
16%
-24%
-22%
-4%
Reader / Idle
1159
1102
-5%
1250
8%
H.264
529
498
-6%
WiFi v1.3
517
416
-20%
384
-26%
503
-3%
662
28%
458
-11%
403
-22%
560
8%
Load
278
253
-9%
287
3%
174
-37%
212
-24%

Pro

+ Prijs
+ Lange looptijden
+ Goede beeldkwaliteit (gezien de prijs)
+ dual-SIM + SD kaartlezer
+ Verwisselbare batterij

Contra

- Donker TFT paneel
- GPS module
- Zwakke SoC
- Langzame eMMC opslag
Getest: Lenovo Moto C. Testmodel geleverd door Lenovo Germany.

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

Het is Lenovo gelukt een degelijk apparaat te introduceren in de lage prijsklasse - behalve het beeldscherm. Voor ons zijn de verrassend goede camera, goede audiofuncties, lange looptijden, hoge flexibiliteit dankzij dual-SIM mogelijkheden, SD kaartlezer en verwisselbare batterij nog steeds niet voldoende om het vreselijke TFT beeldscherm te compenseren. Het ontwerp met ongunstige beeldscherm/oppervlakte verhouding en de materiaalkeuze zijn een kwestie van smaak, maar de bouwkwaliteit is voldoende. 

Afgezien van het tekortschietende beeldscherm hebben we weinig te klagen. De prestaties van het geheugen en de SoC vallen binnen de verwachtingen.

Het is vreemd dat een fabrikant in 2017 kiest voor zo'n lage resolutie - zelfs in het ‎£100 segment.

Hoewel de kwaliteit nog meevalt voor een TFT paneel, kunnen we de Moto C geen aanbeveling geven voor de huidige adviesprijs.

Lenovo Moto C - 28-08-2017 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Behuizing
79%
Toetsenbord
63 / 75 → 84%
Aanwijsapparaat
83%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
34 / 60 → 56%
Gewicht
92%
Batterij
91%
Beeldscherm
77%
Gaming-performance
9 / 63 → 15%
Applicatie-performance
25 / 70 → 35%
Temperatuur
93%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
55 / 91 → 60%
Camera
56%
Gemiddelde
66%
77%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Lenovo Moto C Smartphone
Marcus Herbrich, 2017-09- 1 (Update: 2017-09- 1)