Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Huawei MediaPad M5 lite Tablet

Mike Wobker, 30-09-2018

Surround sound. Huawei heeft de MediaPad M5 lite uitgerust met vier luidsprekers, gecertificeerd door Harman/Kardon. Kopers krijgen een flitsend uitziend middenklasse tablet met LTE-ondersteuning. In ons testrapport lees je wat je voor $ 350 verder kunt verwachten.

Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (MediaPad Serie)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 659
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Geheugen
3072 MB 
Beeldscherm
10.1 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, capacitief, IPS, glimmend: ja
Opslag
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD (max. 256 GB), 1 Vingerafdruklezer, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: versnellingssensor, nabijheidssensor, Hall-sensor, kompas
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1.800/1.900 MHz), 3G WCDMA (B1/B2/B5/B6/B8/B19), LTE FDD/TDD (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B40/B41), LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7.7 x 243.4 x 162.2
Batterij
7500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Besturingssysteem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix auto focus
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix fixed focus
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 4 luidsprekers, Harman/Kardon, Toetsenbord: virtueel, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, USB-oplader, USB Type-C-kabel, SIM-tool, EMUI 8.0, 24 Maanden Garantie, SAR value (lichaam): 1.01 W/kg, fanless
Gewicht
475 g, Voeding: 78 g
Prijs
330 Euro

 

Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
350 MBit/s ∼100% +577%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
262 MBit/s ∼75% +407%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
241 MBit/s ∼69% +366%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s ∼61% +314%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.7 MBit/s ∼15%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
263 MBit/s ∼100% +383%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
240 MBit/s ∼91% +340%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
237 MBit/s ∼90% +335%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
227 MBit/s ∼86% +317%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s ∼21%
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 lite

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite test chart
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite test chart (detail)
529
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
525
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
546
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 546 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 492.2 cd/m² Minimum: 4.26 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 80 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 514 cd/m²
Contrast: 535:1 (Zwart: 0.96 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.42 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
92.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.216
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Screen
47%
-3%
38%
26%
Brightness middle
514
382
-26%
340
-34%
443
-14%
426
-17%
Brightness
492
378
-23%
320
-35%
428
-13%
399
-19%
Brightness Distribution
80
92
15%
84
5%
94
18%
91
14%
Black Level *
0.96
0.24
75%
0.19
80%
0.36
62%
0.38
60%
Contrast
535
1592
198%
1789
234%
1231
130%
1121
110%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.42
2.8
48%
15
-177%
3.3
39%
4.5
17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.84
6
39%
22.8
-132%
7.2
27%
7.9
20%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.5
3.5
46%
4
38%
2.9
55%
5.2
20%
Gamma
2.216 99%
2.33 94%
2.09 105%
2.27 97%
2.23 99%
CCT
6780 96%
6903 94%
6940 94%
6961 93%
6875 95%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 100 Hz ≤ 20 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 100 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 20 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 100 Hz is erg laag en kan dus aanleiding geven tot geïrriteerde ogen en hoofdpijn bij langer gebruik.

Ter vergelijking: 53 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8811 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
20 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 9 ms stijging
↘ 11 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
36 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 17 ms stijging
↘ 19 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (41.1 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
147305 Points ∼63% +120%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
78980 Points ∼34% +18%
Average of class Tablet (14200 - 227987, n=57)
72156 Points ∼31% +8%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
66863 Points ∼29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (62810 - 68232, n=8)
65730 Points ∼28% -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
63777 Points ∼27% -5%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
62725 Points ∼27% -6%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (44992 - 201881, n=11)
130150 Points ∼37% +50%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
113687 Points ∼33% +31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (81992 - 89639, n=6)
87019 Points ∼25% 0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
86908 Points ∼25%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
77717 Points ∼22% -11%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5114 Points ∼50% +8%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
4827 Points ∼47% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4615 - 4911, n=8)
4805 Points ∼47% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
4719 Points ∼46%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
4626 Points ∼45% -2%
Average of class Tablet (2345 - 6315, n=24)
4310 Points ∼42% -9%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3678 Points ∼36% -22%
Work performance score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5843 Points ∼55%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
5648 Points ∼53%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (5798 - 6252, n=8)
5212 Points ∼49%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5040 Points ∼48%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4895 Points ∼46%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 7053, n=65)
4511 Points ∼43%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Points ∼0%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1010 Points ∼58% +36%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
850 Points ∼49% +15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (724 - 919, n=8)
819 Points ∼47% +10%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
811 Points ∼47% +9%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
803 Points ∼46% +8%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
742 Points ∼43%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 1628, n=93)
733 Points ∼42% -1%
Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1602 Points ∼10% +92%
Average of class Tablet (98 - 8602, n=93)
1570 Points ∼10% +88%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
1015 Points ∼6% +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (836 - 859, n=8)
848 Points ∼5% +1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
836 Points ∼5%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
833 Points ∼5% 0%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
701 Points ∼4% -16%
Memory
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2654 Points ∼55% +36%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1948 Points ∼41%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1757 - 2011, n=8)
1910 Points ∼40% -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1513 Points ∼32% -22%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 3985, n=93)
985 Points ∼21% -49%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
972 Points ∼20% -50%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
968 Points ∼20% -50%
System
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3214 Points ∼26% +4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3080 Points ∼25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2899 - 3223, n=8)
3056 Points ∼25% -1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2838 Points ∼23% -8%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2329 Points ∼19% -24%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 6820, n=93)
1977 Points ∼16% -36%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1957 Points ∼16% -36%
Overall
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1769 Points ∼29% +27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1334 - 1480, n=8)
1418 Points ∼23% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1389 Points ∼23%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1312 Points ∼22% -6%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
1281 Points ∼21% -8%
Average of class Tablet (167 - 3302, n=93)
1098 Points ∼18% -21%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1016 Points ∼17% -27%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
11575 Points ∼80% +268%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 11575, n=20)
4166 Points ∼29% +32%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3235 Points ∼22% +3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3148 Points ∼22%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3081 Points ∼21% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2772 - 3148, n=8)
3045 Points ∼21% -3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1562 Points ∼11% -50%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5809 Points ∼16% +53%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
4323 Points ∼12% +14%
Average of class Tablet (1216 - 9358, n=30)
3961 Points ∼11% +4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3805 Points ∼11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (3316 - 3805, n=8)
3608 Points ∼10% -5%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3305 Points ∼9% -13%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
2489 Points ∼7% -35%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1634 Points ∼28% +74%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1541 Points ∼26% +64%
Average of class Tablet (448 - 3933, n=30)
1424 Points ∼24% +51%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1204 Points ∼20% +28%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
940 Points ∼16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (869 - 946, n=8)
919 Points ∼15% -2%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
868 Points ∼15% -8%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2419 Points ∼66% +39%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
1991 Points ∼54% +14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1744 Points ∼48%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1527 - 1827, n=8)
1696 Points ∼46% -3%
Average of class Tablet (793 - 2952, n=47)
1440 Points ∼39% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1363 Points ∼37% -22%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
843 Points ∼23% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1504 Points ∼28% +679%
Average of class Tablet (102 - 5384, n=47)
1213 Points ∼23% +528%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
557 Points ∼10% +189%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
413 Points ∼8% +114%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
381 Points ∼7% +97%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (140 - 338, n=8)
251 Points ∼5% +30%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
193 Points ∼4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1642 Points ∼35% +581%
Average of class Tablet (134 - 3806, n=52)
1059 Points ∼22% +339%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
602 Points ∼13% +150%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
489 Points ∼10% +103%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
464 Points ∼10% +93%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (176 - 409, n=8)
308 Points ∼7% +28%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
241 Points ∼5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2445 Points ∼67% +39%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
2031 Points ∼56% +16%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1758 Points ∼48%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1586 - 1788, n=8)
1707 Points ∼47% -3%
Average of class Tablet (810 - 2952, n=50)
1370 Points ∼38% -22%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1347 Points ∼37% -23%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1128 Points ∼31% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1719 Points ∼21% +1636%
Average of class Tablet (42 - 7525, n=50)
1649 Points ∼20% +1566%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
884 Points ∼11% +793%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
731 Points ∼9% +638%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
598 Points ∼7% +504%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (99 - 532, n=8)
288 Points ∼3% +191%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
99 Points ∼1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1840 Points ∼29% +1372%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 4588, n=54)
1297 Points ∼20% +938%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
929 Points ∼15% +643%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
852 Points ∼13% +582%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
682 Points ∼11% +446%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (125 - 627, n=8)
347 Points ∼5% +178%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
125 Points ∼2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
15850 Points ∼20% +19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
15117 Points ∼19% +14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
14698 Points ∼19% +10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (11780 - 14930, n=8)
13618 Points ∼17% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
13310 Points ∼17%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 27021, n=132)
12706 Points ∼16% -5%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
9729 Points ∼12% -27%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
35210 Points ∼7% +208%
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 110971, n=132)
16699 Points ∼4% +46%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
13239 Points ∼3% +16%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
12771 Points ∼3% +12%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11719 Points ∼2% +3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
11419 Points ∼2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (9936 - 11713, n=8)
11066 Points ∼2% -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
26875 Points ∼13% +128%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 54449, n=133)
14148 Points ∼7% +20%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
13742 Points ∼7% +17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
13227 Points ∼6% +12%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
11791 Points ∼6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (10294 - 12278, n=8)
11543 Points ∼6% -2%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11209 Points ∼5% -5%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
96 fps ∼6% +380%
Average of class Tablet (4.2 - 225, n=159)
24.7 fps ∼1% +24%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
23 fps ∼1% +15%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
22 fps ∼1% +10%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
20 fps ∼1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (16 - 20, n=8)
18.8 fps ∼1% -6%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
18 fps ∼1% -10%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
40 fps ∼9% +111%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
21 fps ∼5% +11%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
20 fps ∼4% +5%
Average of class Tablet (3.7 - 59.7, n=163)
19.3 fps ∼4% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
19 fps ∼4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (16 - 20, n=8)
18.4 fps ∼4% -3%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
17 fps ∼4% -11%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
44 fps ∼8% +400%
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 110, n=98)
16.3 fps ∼3% +85%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.9 fps ∼2% +13%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
9.8 fps ∼2% +11%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
8.8 fps ∼2%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.5 fps ∼2% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (7.3 - 8.8, n=8)
8.31 fps ∼2% -6%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
26 fps ∼7% +202%
Average of class Tablet (2.9 - 58, n=101)
12.6 fps ∼3% +47%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.5 fps ∼3% +10%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
9.2 fps ∼3% +7%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
8.6 fps ∼2%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.3 fps ∼2% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (6.7 - 8.9, n=8)
8.28 fps ∼2% -4%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
18 fps ∼3% +233%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 83, n=48)
15.6 fps ∼3% +189%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
6.4 fps ∼1% +19%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6 fps ∼1% +11%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
5.4 fps ∼1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.9 fps ∼1% -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (3.2 - 5.4, n=8)
4.81 fps ∼1% -11%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
15 fps ∼9% +183%
Average of class Tablet (4.3 - 54.3, n=48)
10.6 fps ∼6% +100%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
6 fps ∼3% +13%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5.7 fps ∼3% +8%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
5.3 fps ∼3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4.5 - 5.6, n=8)
5.04 fps ∼3% -5%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.7 fps ∼3% -11%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
18 fps ∼5% +463%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 26.8, n=27)
8.66 fps ∼2% +171%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3.5 fps ∼1% +9%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3.2 fps ∼1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2.9 - 3.2, n=8)
3.06 fps ∼1% -4%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3 fps ∼1% -6%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼1% -37%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
10 fps ∼9% +233%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 17.9, n=27)
5.97 fps ∼5% +99%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3.3 fps ∼3% +10%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3.1 fps ∼3% +3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3 fps ∼3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2.7 - 3.3, n=8)
2.96 fps ∼3% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼2% -33%

Legende

 
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 HiSilicon Kirin 960s, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 Mediatek MT8176, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Mediatek MT8173, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
8897 Points ∼100% +64%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
8570 Points ∼96% +58%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
6802 Points ∼76% +26%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 31188, n=149)
5858 Points ∼66% +8%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
5412 Points ∼61%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4191 - 5471, n=8)
4947 Points ∼56% -9%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
4502 Points ∼51% -17%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
137 Points ∼100% +14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
120 Points ∼88%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
116 Points ∼85% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (86 - 120, n=8)
104 Points ∼76% -13%
Average of class Tablet (36 - 257, n=67)
102 Points ∼74% -15%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
93 Points ∼68% -22%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Tablet (12 - 202, n=64)
50 Points ∼100% +69%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
47.337 Points ∼95% +60%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
46.39 Points ∼93% +57%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
36.127 Points ∼72% +22%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
29.598 Points ∼59%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (23.4 - 31.3, n=8)
28.1 Points ∼56% -5%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
25.761 Points ∼52% -13%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (8684 - 10788, n=8)
9440 ms * ∼100% -2%
Average of class Tablet (969 - 43092, n=160)
9394 ms * ∼100% -2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
9248.9 ms * ∼98%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
9236.5 ms * ∼98% -0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
5947 ms * ∼63% +36%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
3975.5 ms * ∼42% +57%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
3756.1 ms * ∼40% +59%

* ... kleiner is beter

Huawei MediaPad M5 liteHuawei MediaPad M5 10.8Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50Lenovo Tab 4 10 PlusAmazon Fire HD 10 2017Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-2%
-38%
-16%
-30%
-33%
-61%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
72.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
56.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-22%
61.1
-16%
30.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-59%
46 (3.4 - 87.1, n=104)
-37%
42.3 (14.6 - 73.8, n=39)
-42%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
80.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
83.9
0%
55.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-34%
65.1 (8.2 - 96.5, n=104)
-22%
60.6 (34.4 - 87.7, n=39)
-28%
Random Write 4KB
77.25
60.8
-21%
8.77
-89%
11.8
-85%
9.37
-88%
18.1 (0.75 - 77.3, n=144)
-77%
5.38 (0.13 - 77.9, n=188)
-93%
Random Read 4KB
73.47
54.7
-26%
13.7
-81%
37.3
-49%
27.72
-62%
35.7 (3.59 - 117, n=144)
-51%
17.1 (1.32 - 142, n=188)
-77%
Sequential Write 256KB
82.56
126.8
54%
92.38
12%
135.5
64%
147.67
79%
93.6 (14.8 - 189, n=144)
13%
33.8 (2.04 - 208, n=188)
-59%
Sequential Read 256KB
308.15
247.8
-20%
173.7
-44%
270.1
-12%
262.2
-15%
228 (25.8 - 440, n=144)
-26%
102 (6.75 - 741, n=188)
-67%
Dead Trigger 2
 InstellingenWaarde
 high30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 InstellingenWaarde
 min31 fps
 high HD31 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Max. Belasting
 30.3 °C35.4 °C30.8 °C 
 29.1 °C30.5 °C31.2 °C 
 29.1 °C29.5 °C30.1 °C 
Maximum: 35.4 °C
Gemiddelde: 30.7 °C
31.2 °C33.7 °C30.8 °C
30.5 °C31.2 °C30.6 °C
30.3 °C30.1 °C30.2 °C
Maximum: 33.7 °C
Gemiddelde: 31 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  39.2 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.3362525.634.83125.7364027.428.1503735.56323.328.68021.431.510021.734.712519.942.716017.448.72001756.725016.45931514.558.740014.26350014.160.563012.655.680012.557.610001258.3125011.863.3160011.669.6200011.469.3250011.369.9315011.470.9400011.171.6500011.270.4630011.369.5800011.269.41000011.359.81250011.359.41600011.349.5SPL65.56767.167.365.824.180.5N18.919.520.221.617.80.646.7median 11.8Huawei MediaPad M5 litemedian 59.8Delta1.79.328.630.224.926.624.624.426.422.530.824.623.619.820.221.119.928.817.642.919.159.719.159.617.456.616.961.616.863.515.166.316.567.815.666.41561.915.565.115.367.615.771.515.569.715.572.815.467.915.8641663.815.860.816.154.716.151.617.349.727.979.9146.4median 16Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8median 63.50.65.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 2.8 / 3.3 / 3.9 Watt
Belasting midlight 5.2 / 7.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
7500 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
7000 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Power Consumption
-40%
-56%
8%
-12%
Idle Minimum *
2.8
2.01
28%
3.21
-15%
1.23
56%
1.55
45%
Idle Average *
3.3
5.4
-64%
5.97
-81%
3.92
-19%
4.17
-26%
Idle Maximum *
3.9
5.44
-39%
6.19
-59%
4.03
-3%
4.25
-9%
Load Average *
5.2
8.55
-64%
9.72
-87%
5
4%
7.13
-37%
Load Maximum *
7.2
11.53
-60%
9.97
-38%
7.09
2%
9.63
-34%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
36h 02min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 12min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 34min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 59min
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
7500 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
7000 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Batterijduur
-30%
-54%
-20%
-34%
Reader / Idle
2162
1344
-38%
735
-66%
1625
-25%
960
-56%
H.264
934
702
-25%
795
-15%
585
-37%
WiFi v1.3
852
648
-24%
387
-55%
647
-24%
542
-36%
Load
299
196
-34%
175
-41%
256
-14%
274
-8%

Pro

+ stabiele behuizing
+ goede systeemprestaties
+ compatibel met stylus
+ USB Type-C
+ ondersteund LTE

Contra

- laagcontrast beeldscherm
- matige camera
- apps kunnen niet op de SD-kaart opgeslagen worden
In review: Huawei MediaPad M5 lite. Test unit provided by Huawei Germany
In review: Huawei MediaPad M5 lite. Test unit provided by Huawei Germany

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Het MediaPad M5 lite doet het goed in onze tests. De systeemprestaties zijn voldoende voor de meeste alledaagse taken en zelfs veeleisender applicaties kunnen gedraaid worden. Moderne games kunnen ook gespeeld worden op dit apparaat, hoewel gebruikers wel tevreden moeten zijn met gemiddelde detailinstellingen.

Het MediaPad M5 lite kan zijn grote broer op veel vlakken bijbenen, de voornaamste zwakheden zijn het beeldscherm en de camera's.

Voor ~$ 350 biedt Huawei met de MediaPad M5 lite een goed uitgerust tablet. Het heeft een grote batterij, een vingerafdrukscanner, LTE en een goede SD-kaartlezer. Gebruikers zullen echter een lage camerakwaliteit met relatief lage resolutie en beperkte opslagmogelijkheden moeten accepteren. Apps kunnen niet geïnstalleerd worden op de microSD-kaart. De app opslagcapaciteit is daarom beperkt tot 32 GB en het lage contrast beeldscherm zal ook niet iedereen kunnen bekoren.

Huawei MediaPad M5 lite - 24-09-2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Behuizing
85%
Toetsenbord
71 / 80 → 89%
Aanwijsapparaat
88%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
42 / 65 → 65%
Gewicht
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Batterij
97%
Beeldscherm
81%
Gaming-performance
19 / 68 → 27%
Applicatie-performance
40 / 76 → 53%
Temperatuur
95%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 84%
Camera
56 / 85 → 66%
Gemiddelde
72%
84%
Tablet - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Huawei MediaPad M5 lite Tablet
Mike Wobker, 2018-09-30 (Update: 2018-09-30)