C 2018
Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 Tablet

Florian Wimmer, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Tanja Hinum (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 13-05-2018

Kleine audio-expert. Multimedia-capaciteiten en goede camera's zijn nog altijd belangrijke criteria bij de aankoop van een goedkope tablet. Op papier kan de Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 al het nodige bieden. Lees verder om te weten te komen of het toestel ons ook wist te overtuigen.

Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (MediaPad Serie)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 960
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-G71 MP8
Geheugen
4096 MB 
Beeldscherm
8.4 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 359 PPI, capacitief touchscreen, IPS, glimmend: ja
Opslag
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 24 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 3.0, Audio Verbindingen: audio-output via USB-C, Card Reader: micro-SD tot 256 GB, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, Sensoren: acceleratie-sensor, gyroscoop, Hall-sensor, aptX
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, 4G (1,3,4,5,7,8,12,17,18,19,20,26,34,38,39,40,41), 3G (850/​900/​1900/​2100), 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7.3 x 212.6 x 124.8
Batterij
19.4 Wh, 5100 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Quick Charge 9 V / 2 A
Besturingssysteem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2, auto-focus
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.2
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 2 luidsprekers, Toetsenbord: virtueel toetsenbord, oplader, USB-kabel, USB-C audio-adapter, SIM-tool, HiCare, Game Suite, PhoneClone, 24 Maanden Garantie, LTE-A Cat6 download: 300 MBit/s, ​upload: 50 MBit/s; SAR-waarde: 0,271 W/kg (head), 1,01 W/kg (body), fanless
Gewicht
316 g, Voeding: 72 g
Prijs
379 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4

Formaat Vergelijking

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
315 MBit/s ∼100% +55%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
209 MBit/s ∼66% +3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 32 GB eMMC Flash
203 MBit/s ∼64%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
99.3 MBit/s ∼32% -51%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.5 MBit/s ∼15% -77%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
260 MBit/s ∼100% +27%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
209 MBit/s ∼80% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 32 GB eMMC Flash
205 MBit/s ∼79%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
86 MBit/s ∼33% -58%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
41.5 MBit/s ∼16% -80%
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overzicht
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overzicht
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – tuinen
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – tuinen
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – brug
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – brug
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 – overzicht
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 – overzicht
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 – tuinen
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 – tuinen
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 – brug
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 – brug

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
Foto van testdiagram
Foto van testdiagram
Details van testdiagram
Details van testdiagram
Foto's van ColorChecker: de originele kleur wordt weergegeven in de onderste helft van elk veld.
Foto's van ColorChecker: de originele kleur wordt weergegeven in de onderste helft van elk veld.
382
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
397
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 408 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 391.9 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 92 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 403 cd/m²
Contrast: 604:1 (Zwart: 0.67 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.78 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 7.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.278
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Lenovo Tab 4 8
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
TFT LCD, 1280x800, 8
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4
Screen
-1%
9%
34%
16%
Brightness middle
405
419
3%
455
12%
509
26%
460
14%
Brightness
392
412
5%
446
14%
477
22%
445
14%
Brightness Distribution
92
91
-1%
91
-1%
91
-1%
90
-2%
Black Level *
0.67
0.39
42%
0.51
24%
0.48
28%
0.45
33%
Contrast
604
1074
78%
892
48%
1060
75%
1022
69%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.78
8.5
-47%
5.5
5%
3.45
40%
6.2
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.82
13.8
-41%
14.8
-51%
5.17
47%
10.5
-7%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.2
10.3
-43%
5.5
24%
4.5
37%
6.5
10%
Gamma
2.278 97%
2.6 85%
2.23 99%
2.11 104%
2.33 94%
CCT
8405 77%
6216 105%
7852 83%
7171 91%
8056 81%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 2451 Hz ≤ 25 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 2451 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 25 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 2451 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen.

Ter vergelijking: 53 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8677 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
20.5 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 19 ms stijging
↘ 22 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
13 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 15 ms stijging
↘ 11 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (41.1 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
147597 Points ∼59%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (124087 - 157445, n=7)
143408 Points ∼57% -3%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
86735 Points ∼35% -41%
Average of class Tablet (14200 - 227987, n=59)
71242 Points ∼28% -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
45573 Points ∼18% -69%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
36893 Points ∼15% -75%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
34714 Points ∼14% -76%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
181614 Points ∼52%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (170015 - 181614, n=4)
174560 Points ∼50% -4%
Average of class Tablet (20856 - 201881, n=13)
117149 Points ∼34% -35%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (6006 - 6299, n=7)
6136 Points ∼60% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
6006 Points ∼58%
Average of class Tablet (2345 - 6315, n=25)
4305 Points ∼42% -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
3789 Points ∼37% -37%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
3312 Points ∼32% -45%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
2907 Points ∼28% -52%
Work performance score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (6830 - 7403, n=7)
7199 Points ∼54% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
7053 Points ∼53%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5204 Points ∼39% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
4945 Points ∼37% -30%
Average of class Tablet (2529 - 7053, n=67)
4487 Points ∼34% -36%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
4457 Points ∼34% -37%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
4125 Points ∼31% -42%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
1215 Points ∼70%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (913 - 1215, n=7)
1076 Points ∼62% -11%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1022 Points ∼59% -16%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
773 Points ∼45% -36%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 1628, n=95)
718 Points ∼41% -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
699 Points ∼40% -42%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
593 Points ∼34% -51%
Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
4143 Points ∼26%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (2284 - 4143, n=7)
3731 Points ∼24% -10%
Average of class Tablet (98 - 8602, n=95)
1548 Points ∼10% -63%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1302 Points ∼8% -69%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
530 Points ∼3% -87%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
447 Points ∼3% -89%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
334 Points ∼2% -92%
Memory
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
3985 Points ∼83%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (2778 - 4277, n=7)
3512 Points ∼73% -12%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2212 Points ∼46% -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
1176 Points ∼25% -70%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 3985, n=95)
979 Points ∼20% -75%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
784 Points ∼16% -80%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
736 Points ∼15% -82%
System
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
3940 Points ∼32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (3572 - 4154, n=7)
3826 Points ∼31% -3%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
3581 Points ∼29% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
2337 Points ∼19% -41%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 6820, n=95)
1973 Points ∼16% -50%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
1477 Points ∼12% -63%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
1152 Points ∼9% -71%
Overall
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2982 Points ∼49%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (2204 - 2985, n=7)
2701 Points ∼44% -9%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1800 Points ∼30% -40%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 3302, n=95)
1080 Points ∼18% -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
1005 Points ∼16% -66%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
796 Points ∼13% -73%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
640 Points ∼10% -79%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
11539 Points ∼80%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (9492 - 11539, n=4)
5258 (min: 9492, max: 11539) Points ∼36% -54%
Average of class Tablet (862 - 11575, n=21)
4008 Points ∼28% -65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
2369 Points ∼16% -79%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
1324 Points ∼9% -89%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
6509 Points ∼18%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (6173 - 6527, n=7)
6384 Points ∼18% -2%
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 9358, n=33)
3915 Points ∼11% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
3710 Points ∼10% -43%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
1908 Points ∼5% -71%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
1683 Points ∼5% -74%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
1896 Points ∼32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1852 - 1899, n=7)
1875 Points ∼32% -1%
Average of class Tablet (429 - 3933, n=33)
1384 Points ∼23% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
726 Points ∼12% -62%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
688 Points ∼12% -64%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
628 Points ∼11% -67%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2653 Points ∼63%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2322 Points ∼56% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1679 - 2653, n=7)
2181 Points ∼52% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
1721 Points ∼41% -35%
Average of class Tablet (793 - 2952, n=48)
1447 Points ∼35% -45%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
878 Points ∼21% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1646 - 2798, n=7)
2063 Points ∼38% +16%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
1778 Points ∼33%
Average of class Tablet (102 - 5384, n=48)
1196 Points ∼22% -33%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
832 Points ∼15% -53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
239 Points ∼4% -87%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
121 Points ∼2% -93%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1747 - 2666, n=7)
2064 Points ∼44% +8%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
1919 Points ∼41%
Average of class Tablet (134 - 3806, n=53)
1047 Points ∼22% -45%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
970 Points ∼20% -49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
296 Points ∼6% -85%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
150 Points ∼3% -92%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2555 Points ∼62%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2261 Points ∼54% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1662 - 2555, n=7)
2086 Points ∼50% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
1522 Points ∼37% -40%
Average of class Tablet (810 - 2952, n=51)
1379 Points ∼33% -46%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
881 Points ∼21% -66%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
874 Points ∼21% -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2501 Points ∼30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1856 - 2990, n=7)
2496 Points ∼30% 0%
Average of class Tablet (42 - 7525, n=51)
1630 Points ∼20% -35%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
997 Points ∼12% -60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
399 Points ∼5% -84%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
193 Points ∼2% -92%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
42 Points ∼1% -98%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2513 Points ∼39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1865 - 2649, n=7)
2374 Points ∼37% -6%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 4588, n=55)
1288 Points ∼20% -49%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1139 Points ∼18% -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
477 Points ∼7% -81%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
234 Points ∼4% -91%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
53 Points ∼1% -98%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
15538 Points ∼20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (14456 - 15341, n=6)
15019 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
12947 Points ∼16%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 27021, n=135)
12770 Points ∼16%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
10458 Points ∼13%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
9274 Points ∼12%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (32243 - 38979, n=6)
35199 Points ∼7%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
22141 Points ∼5%
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 110971, n=135)
16661 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
7720 Points ∼2%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
5496 Points ∼1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
5435 Points ∼1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (25766 - 28883, n=6)
27083 Points ∼13%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
20230 Points ∼10%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 54449, n=136)
14162 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
8481 Points ∼4%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
6144 Points ∼3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
5986 Points ∼3%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
78 fps ∼5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (43 - 93, n=7)
68.4 fps ∼4% -12%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
29 fps ∼2% -63%
Average of class Tablet (4.2 - 225, n=161)
24.6 fps ∼1% -68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
12 fps ∼1% -85%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
9.9 fps ∼1% -87%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
7.8 fps ∼0% -90%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (40 - 60, n=7)
53.9 fps ∼12% +6%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
51 fps ∼11%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
23 fps ∼5% -55%
Average of class Tablet (3.7 - 59.7, n=165)
19.2 fps ∼4% -62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
19 fps ∼4% -63%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
17 fps ∼4% -67%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
14 fps ∼3% -73%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
39 fps ∼7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (19 - 41, n=7)
31.7 fps ∼6% -19%
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 110, n=99)
16.2 fps ∼3% -58%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
13 fps ∼2% -67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
5.1 fps ∼1% -87%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
3.6 fps ∼1% -91%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
2.8 fps ∼1% -93%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (20 - 37, n=7)
28.1 fps ∼8% +17%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
24 fps ∼7%
Average of class Tablet (2.9 - 58, n=102)
12.5 fps ∼3% -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
9.2 fps ∼3% -62%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
9 fps ∼2% -62%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
7.1 fps ∼2% -70%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
5.9 fps ∼2% -75%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
27 fps ∼5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (21 - 28, n=7)
24 fps ∼4% -11%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 83, n=49)
15.4 fps ∼3% -43%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
7.7 fps ∼1% -71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
3.2 fps ∼1% -88%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
2.3 fps ∼0% -91%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (12 - 28, n=7)
18.6 fps ∼11% +33%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
14 fps ∼8%
Average of class Tablet (4.3 - 54.3, n=49)
10.5 fps ∼6% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
6.7 fps ∼4% -52%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
5 fps ∼3% -64%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
4.2 fps ∼2% -70%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
16 fps ∼4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (15 - 16, n=7)
13.1 fps ∼3% -18%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 26.8, n=28)
8.47 fps ∼2% -47%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
4.8 fps ∼1% -70%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
2 fps ∼1% -87%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (9.3 - 16, n=7)
12.2 fps ∼10% +31%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
9.3 fps ∼8%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 17.9, n=28)
5.87 fps ∼5% -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
3.7 fps ∼3% -60%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
3.1 fps ∼3% -67%

Legende

 
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab 4 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)
11404 Points ∼100% +1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)
11338 Points ∼99%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (10016 - 11897, n=7)
10823 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 31188, n=152)
5858 Points ∼51% -48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
4768 Points ∼42% -58%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)
2903 Points ∼25% -74%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)
2826 Points ∼25% -75%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)
184 Points ∼100%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (107 - 184, n=7)
148 Points ∼80% -20%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)
136 Points ∼74% -26%
Average of class Tablet (36 - 257, n=68)
102 Points ∼55% -45%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)
69 Points ∼38% -62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
67 Points ∼36% -64%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)
57 Points ∼31% -69%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (56.8 - 68.6, n=7)
59.3 Points ∼100% +4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)
56.76 Points ∼96%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)
53.7 Points ∼91% -5%
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 202, n=67)
49.7 Points ∼84% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
26.099 Points ∼44% -54%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)
19.519 Points ∼33% -66%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)
18.36 Points ∼31% -68%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)
12033 ms * ∼100% -222%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)
11817.6 ms * ∼98% -216%
Average of class Tablet (969 - 43092, n=163)
9429 ms * ∼78% -153%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
6785.6 ms * ∼56% -82%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)
3734 ms * ∼31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (2734 - 3734, n=7)
3226 ms * ∼27% +14%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch (Chrome 54)
2822.9 ms * ∼23% +24%

* ... kleiner is beter

Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4Amazon Fire HD 8 2017Lenovo Tab 4 8Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inchAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-58%
-30%
-39%
-36%
-36%
-61%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
70.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
34.15
-52%
61.1
-14%
64.3
-9%
23.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-67%
46.3 (3.4 - 87.1, n=106)
-35%
42.5 (14.6 - 73.8, n=41)
-40%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
51.06
-40%
84.8
0%
78.6
-7%
61.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-27%
65.5 (8.2 - 96.5, n=106)
-23%
60.8 (34.4 - 87.7, n=41)
-28%
Random Write 4KB
65.1
11.51
-82%
7.1
-89%
10.98
-83%
31.35
-52%
18.1 (0.75 - 77.3, n=146)
-72%
5.45 (0.13 - 77.9, n=190)
-92%
Random Read 4KB
62.8
21.55
-66%
44
-30%
25.96
-59%
32.04
-49%
35.9 (3.59 - 117, n=146)
-43%
17.4 (1.32 - 142, n=190)
-72%
Sequential Write 256KB
132.24
47.23
-64%
72.3
-45%
53.99
-59%
117.15
-11%
93.9 (14.8 - 189, n=146)
-29%
34.5 (2.04 - 208, n=190)
-74%
Sequential Read 256KB
268.62
159.08
-41%
265.1
-1%
218.05
-19%
249.68
-7%
229 (25.8 - 440, n=146)
-15%
103 (6.75 - 741, n=190)
-62%
Shadow Fight 3
 InstellingenWaarde
 high58 fps
 minimal58 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 InstellingenWaarde
 min58 fps
 high HD58 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Battle Bay
 InstellingenWaarde
 half resolution58 fps
 full resolution58 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Max. Belasting
 35.6 °C35 °C35.7 °C 
 38.2 °C35.1 °C36.4 °C 
 37.3 °C34.9 °C36 °C 
Maximum: 38.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 36 °C
34.7 °C35.3 °C35.5 °C
34.7 °C35.3 °C36.1 °C
35.4 °C35.3 °C36.4 °C
Maximum: 36.4 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.4 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  34.5 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.630.92531.539.73136.135.84030.240.65033.842.76328.432.38026.628.310024.427.212521.934.416020.44620019.456.425020.463.431517.565.540018.16850017.369.46301669.680016.170.3100015.571125015.273.6160015.175.820001574.925001576.1315014.976.1400015.172.3500015.170.7630015.367.2800015.266.21000015.264.61250015.263.31600015.259.2SPL27.785N161.7median 15.3median 68Delta1.86.731.638.825.437.225.328.932.930.833.641.731.632.828.429.22722.620.828.62242.921.349.920.851.121.260.119.46719.570.417.771.417.972.617.875.517.375.317.475.516.775.317.277.818.281.717.979.317.670.917.765.917.867.717.962.718.151.918.247.730881.369.4median 17.9median 67.71.312.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MediaPad M5 8.4Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 1.5 / 0.2 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 2.1 / 3.74 / 4.33 Watt
Belasting midlight 6.32 / 9.13 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
5100 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
 mAh
Lenovo Tab 4 8
4850 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
4450 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5100 mAh
Power Consumption
36%
23%
35%
7%
Idle Minimum *
2.1
0.99
53%
1.1
48%
0.89
58%
1.51
28%
Idle Average *
3.74
2.74
27%
3.51
6%
3.13
16%
3.64
3%
Idle Maximum *
4.33
2.83
35%
4.14
4%
3.36
22%
3.68
15%
Load Average *
6.32
4.51
29%
4.86
23%
3.93
38%
6.95
-10%
Load Maximum *
9.13
5.69
38%
6.13
33%
5.45
40%
9.11
-0%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
19h 14min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 27min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 41min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 58min
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
5100 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
 mAh
Lenovo Tab 4 8
4850 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
4450 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5100 mAh
Batterijduur
34%
-11%
16%
-11%
Reader / Idle
1154
2032
76%
1207
5%
1357
18%
1110
-4%
H.264
701
744
6%
603
-14%
493
-30%
583
-17%
WiFi v1.3
627
770
23%
452
-28%
895
43%
546
-13%
Load
298
393
32%
276
-7%
396
33%
268
-10%

Pro

+ hoge prestaties
+ scherm met hoge resolutie
+ goede LTE-modem met telefoonfunctie
+ gaming perfect mogelijk
+ prima camera's
+ batterijduur geschikt voor intensief gebruik
+ stevige behuizing met goede bouwkwaliteit

Contra

- touchscreen onnauwkeurig aan de randen
- geen 3.5-audiopoort
- intense blauwe tint in het scherm
- veel bloatware
- kleine interne opslag
- energieverbruik is te hoog
- throttling onder belasting
Testing the Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4. Test unit provided by Huawei Germany.
Testing the Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4. Test unit provided by Huawei Germany.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Met de MediaPad M5 8.4 biedt Huawei een elegante tablet die zijn iets hogere prijs waard is. Dit wordt verzekerd door de goede camera's, het scherm met hoge resolutie, de krachtige luidsprekers en een aantal gimmicks zoals de mogelijkheid om telefoongesprekken te voeren. De prestaties zijn prima en de hoogwaardige, ergonomische behuizing voelt goed in de hand.

Je zal het echter wel zonder klassieke audiopoort moeten stellen in de MediaPad M5 8.4. Daarnaast is het touchscreen redelijk onnauwkeurig aan de randen en heeft een scherm een sterke, blauwe tint, die je gelukkig wel met de geïnstalleerde tools kan verminderen. Hoewel een extra microSD-kaart kan helpen om de interne opslag aan te vullen, is deze laatste aan de beperkte kant. Aan het hoge energieverbruik valt helaas weinig te doen. De batterijduur is niettemin degelijk waardoor dit minder belangrijk is. Het grootste minpunt is waarschijnlijk de ernstige throttling onder aanhoudende belasting.

De goede prijs/prestaties-verhouding en talrijke voordelen zoals de gedetailleerde foto's van de camera en de uitstekende behuizing zorgen ervoor dat we de MediaPad M5 8.4 kunnen aanbevelen.

De MediaPad M5 8.4 verdient onze aanbeveling omwille van een goede prijs/prestaties-verhouding, de hoogwaardige indruk van de behuizing en een kleine lijst met ernstige minpunten.

Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 - 07-05-2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Behuizing
90%
Toetsenbord
69 / 80 → 87%
Aanwijsapparaat
82%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
43 / 65 → 66%
Gewicht
86 / 40-88 → 96%
Batterij
93%
Beeldscherm
82%
Gaming-performance
52 / 68 → 77%
Applicatie-performance
63 / 76 → 82%
Temperatuur
90%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
72 / 91 → 79%
Camera
68 / 85 → 79%
Gemiddelde
76%
87%
Tablet - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 Tablet
Florian Wimmer, 2018-05-13 (Update: 2018-05-13)