Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport HP Pavilion 14 Laptop: een stijlvolle alleskunner met een helder scherm

Een dominante ventilator. Met de Pavilion 14-ce3040ng biedt HP een multimedia-laptops gebaseerd op de splinternieuwe Ice Lake-architectuur van Intel. Tijdens het testen ondervonden we dat de 14-incher een aantal onnodige grillen heeft.
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser,
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Processor
Intel Core i7-1065G7 4 x 1.3 - 3.9 GHz, Ice Lake U
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 - 4096 MB, Core: 1519 MHz, Geheugen: 1500 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 441.87, Optimus
Geheugen
16384 MB 
, SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, Single Channel
Beeldscherm
14 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, AUO543D, IPS, Full-HD, 60 Hz, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
Intel 495 (Ice Lake-U PCH-LP Premium)
Opslag
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, 1024 GB 
, M.2 NVMe-SSD
Geluidskaart
Intel Ice Point-LP PCH - cAVS
Verbindingen
3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm-klink (gecombineerd), Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 18 x 327 x 226
Batterij
41 Wh Lithium-Ion, 3-cell
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 2.0, Toetsenbord: Chiclet, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 65-Watt-voeding, Quick Start Guide, 24 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
1.55 kg, Voeding: 222 g
Prijs
1000 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Hoogte
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
78 %
01-2020
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250
1.6 kg18 mm14"1920x1080
85 %
07-2019
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
i5-8265U, GeForce MX250
1.4 kg15.9 mm14"1920x1080
84 %
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250
1.8 kg17.95 mm15.6"1920x1080
83 %
07-2019
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250
1.8 kg18 mm15.6"1920x1080

Vergelijkingstoestellen

363.4 mm 243.5 mm 17.95 mm 1.8 kg357.2 mm 230.3 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg327 mm 226 mm 18 mm 1.6 kg323 mm 227 mm 15.9 mm 1.4 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
82.9 MB/s ∼100% +159%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
69.1 MB/s ∼83% +116%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 204, n=207)
60.7 MB/s ∼73% +90%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II)
33.3 MB/s ∼40% +4%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32 MB/s ∼39%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89.9 MB/s ∼100% +172%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.8 MB/s ∼91% +148%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.2 - 253, n=203)
75.7 MB/s ∼84% +129%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II)
35.6 MB/s ∼40% +8%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33 MB/s ∼37%
359
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
375
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
377
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
AUO543D
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 395 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 375.4 cd/m² Minimum: 28 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 91 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 395 cd/m²
Contrast: 1519:1 (Zwart: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.92 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8, calibrated: 0.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.69 | 0.64-98 Ø6
98% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.78
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
AUO543D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
NV140FHM-N48, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
BOE NV156FHM-N48, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
14%
8%
39%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
60.8 (29.2, 31.6)
39.6 (21.6, 18)
35%
45 (23, 22)
26%
24.8 (12.8, 12)
59%
Response Time Black / White *
29.6 (13.2, 16.4)
32 (18, 14)
-8%
33 (18, 15)
-11%
24 (14, 10)
19%
PWM Frequency
352.1 (99)
250 (90)
Screen
-55%
-50%
-69%
Brightness middle
395
316
-20%
278
-30%
262.3
-34%
Brightness
375
301
-20%
271
-28%
250
-33%
Brightness Distribution
91
88
-3%
89
-2%
89
-2%
Black Level *
0.26
0.28
-8%
0.26
-0%
0.43
-65%
Contrast
1519
1129
-26%
1069
-30%
610
-60%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.92
5.3
10%
4.73
20%
5.81
2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.79
18.5
-89%
8.38
14%
14.7
-50%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.91
4.8
-427%
5.17
-468%
5.36
-489%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.69
2.4
64%
2.59
61%
2.8
58%
Gamma
2.78 79%
2.05 107%
2.38 92%
2.15 102%
CCT
7596 86%
6644 98%
6160 106%
7016 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63
37.6
-40%
36
-43%
35.2
-44%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98
58.3
-41%
58
-41%
55.6
-43%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
-21% / -44%
-21% / -41%
-15% / -52%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
29.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 13.2 ms stijging
↘ 16.4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 71 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (24.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
60.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 29.2 ms stijging
↘ 31.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (38.8 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 17612 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø625 (592.25-691)
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø548 (543.22-613.69)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø470 (467.49-492.88)
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø502 (489.9-680.49)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
190 Points ∼100%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
Intel Core i7-8565U
168 Points ∼88% -12%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U
165 Points ∼87% -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
152 Points ∼80% -20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 214, n=414)
133 Points ∼70% -30%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
691 Points ∼100%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
Intel Core i7-8565U
680 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
600 (548.41min - 619.74max) Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (72.4 - 1600, n=434)
533 Points ∼77% -23%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U
493 Points ∼71% -29%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
474 Points ∼100%
Average of class Multimedia
  (62.6 - 543, n=56)
409 Points ∼86% -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
401 Points ∼85% -15%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U
390 Points ∼82% -18%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (148 - 3422, n=57)
1847 Points ∼100% +20%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1543 Points ∼84%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
1367 Points ∼74% -11%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U
1035 Points ∼56% -33%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
691 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
190 Points
Help
PCMark 10 - Score
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
4289 Points ∼100%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4236 Points ∼99% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
GeForce MX250, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4192 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4148 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1144 - 5758, n=142)
4114 Points ∼96% -4%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-22%
-39%
-36%
Write 4K
181.6
157.6
-13%
130.1
-28%
149.9
-17%
Read 4K
57.41
46.39
-19%
27.64
-52%
46.13
-20%
Write Seq
1982
1214
-39%
1438
-27%
969.9
-51%
Read Seq
1899
1295
-32%
1319
-31%
1085
-43%
Write 4K Q32T1
509.4
370.7
-27%
323.3
-37%
460.8
-10%
Read 4K Q32T1
544.7
461.1
-15%
359.9
-34%
410.3
-25%
Write Seq Q32T1
3072
1887.9
-39%
1454
-53%
662.4
-78%
Read Seq Q32T1
3281
3540.2
8%
1740
-47%
1728
-47%
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3281 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3072 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 544.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 509.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1899 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1982 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 57.41 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 181.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
4850 punten
3DMark Time Spy Score
1223 punten
Help
05101520Tooltip
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02: Ø11.2 (7-15)
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (142 - 7372, n=98)
1719 Points ∼100% +56%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
1111 Points ∼65% +1%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
1105 Points ∼64%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
1090 Points ∼63% -1%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
3720 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
3705 Points ∼100% +3%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
3616 Points ∼97% +1%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
3580 Points ∼96%
Average of class Multimedia
  (337 - 19655, n=454)
3164 Points ∼85% -12%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
4942 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
4756 Points ∼96% +3%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
4633 Points ∼94% 0%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
4614 Points ∼93%
Average of class Multimedia
  (352 - 26292, n=677)
3282 Points ∼66% -29%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.8 - 138, n=136)
33 fps ∼100% +76%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
20.4 fps ∼62% +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
GeForce MX250, i5-8265U
19.8 fps ∼60% +5%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
19.1 fps ∼58% +2%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7
18.8 (15min) fps ∼57%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.2 - 210, n=130)
50 fps ∼100% +49%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
37.9 fps ∼76% +13%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
36.8 fps ∼74% +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
GeForce MX250, i5-8265U
34.5 fps ∼69% +3%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7
33.5 (26min) fps ∼67%
lage gem. hoge ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 56.4 33.5 18.8 10.9 fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 118 53.9 32.1 27 fps
Prey (2017) 108 46.2 36.4 30.1 fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 64 27 19 15 fps
ELEX (2017) 53.9 25.4 20.6 15.6 fps
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 79.1 25.4 21.8 18.7 fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 50.7 21.9 18.7 12.7 fps
The Crew 2 (2018) 43.9 20.2 19.5 16.5 fps
Control (2019) 41 14 10.1 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 52.9 20.7 13.4 10.2 fps
FIFA 20 (2019) 120 82.4 76.8 62.5 fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 36 19 17 12 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 65.2 25.2 20.3 11.8 fps
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 41.7 23.3 19.4 15.9 fps
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 41.1 20.2 18.4 15.3 fps
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 29.4 22.5 18.1 fps
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 20.9 15.2 9.8 6.2 fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.234.534.132.632.733.62537.543.643.735.836.837.43130.133.53330.129.231.34034.335.432.435.132.835.35039.1323338.627.940.66338.538.140.134.529.438.18035.633.7283427.23510040.228.125.427.725.240.812530.829.126.527.726.83216031.53329.734.22832.220028.727.225.427.623.828.625029.925.124.526.521.730.731528.825.722.322.920.428.640033.425.823.121.119.333.55003325.322.320.719.132.463033.12622.620.817.533.78003426.523.51816.934.110003527.724.417.717.335.2125036.929.326.219.418.436.8160038.930.626.918.217.138.9200039.531.728.617.816.839.7250040.333271816.840.231504128.122.917.916.940.54000392420.717.91739500033.822.419.518.217.333.763003220.418.417.81732800027.11918.318.116.727.11000024.518.618.21816.724.11250023.218.618.218.116.722.51600022.51918.31816.620SPL49.340.336.531.529.749.3N6.53.22.41.71.36.5median 33.1median 26median 23.1median 18.2median 17.3median 33.5Delta4.23.13.232.14.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
31 / 36 / 41 dB (A)
Belasting
49 / 49 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
i5-8265U, GeForce MX250
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250
Average of class Multimedia
 
Noise
20%
13%
16%
12%
off / environment *
30
29.3
2%
29.9
-0%
28
7%
30.9 (22 - 304, n=215)
-3%
Idle Minimum *
31
29.3
5%
29.9
4%
28
10%
31.1 (26.5 - 40.1, n=1016)
-0%
Idle Average *
36
29.3
19%
29.9
17%
28
22%
31.9 (26.5 - 42.2, n=1018)
11%
Idle Maximum *
41
29.3
29%
29.9
27%
30
27%
32.5 (26.5 - 47, n=1018)
21%
Load Average *
49
34.4
30%
41.7
15%
41.4
16%
36.5 (28 - 51.8, n=1018)
26%
Witcher 3 ultra *
47
34.4
27%
41.5
12%
Load Maximum *
49
34.9
29%
41.7
15%
41.5
15%
41.9 (32.5 - 62.7, n=1018)
14%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 42 °C47 °C46 °C 
 32 °C45 °C46 °C 
 27 °C31 °C32 °C 
Maximum: 47 °C
Gemiddelde: 38.7 °C
46 °C47 °C38 °C
42 °C39 °C29 °C
28 °C26 °C25 °C
Maximum: 47 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.6 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  45 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 31 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 38.9 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-3 °C / -5.4 F).
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
i5-8265U, GeForce MX250
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250
Average of class Multimedia
 
Heat
5%
-15%
-6%
-6%
Maximum Upper Side *
47
41.8
11%
53.7
-14%
45.4
3%
41.8 (27.2 - 71, n=974)
11%
Maximum Bottom *
47
43.3
8%
56
-19%
40.8
13%
45.1 (28.5 - 82, n=974)
4%
Idle Upper Side *
25
25.1
-0%
28.4
-14%
29.6
-18%
29.6 (21.1 - 40.2, n=826)
-18%
Idle Bottom *
26
25.4
2%
28.9
-11%
31.2
-20%
30.9 (21.5 - 44.4, n=826)
-19%

* ... kleiner is beter

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.730.82536.835.53129.229.74032.836.65027.939.56329.437.38027.235.610025.232.512526.832.51602834.620023.842.725021.75631520.461.440019.367.350019.170.163017.572.580016.967.7100017.369.1125018.472.4160017.176.7200016.873.5250016.872315016.973.240001775.7500017.375.163001773800016.766.61000016.770.11250016.767.91600016.655.3SPL29.785N1.363.7median 17.3median 69.1Delta2.19.432.63028.626.626.826.527.828.124.32823.225.223.52523.232.22135.120.641.121.150.720.653.120.453.620.558.919.861.419.560.318.85718.462.117.561.217.362.516.85716.257.115.956.215.66015.655.115.449.215.241.915.243.61538.714.742.329.370.51.226.6median 17.5median 55.12.48.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion 14-ce3040ngLenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.7 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 4 / 7 / 10 Watt
Belasting midlight 62 / 64 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
i5-8265U, GeForce MX250
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
12%
1%
-25%
-85%
Idle Minimum *
4
2.74
31%
4.4
-10%
6
-50%
11.3 (2.1 - 101, n=972)
-183%
Idle Average *
7
5.64
19%
6.9
1%
10.3
-47%
15.8 (3 - 122, n=972)
-126%
Idle Maximum *
10
8.4
16%
9.9
1%
10.5
-5%
19.4 (4.6 - 181, n=972)
-94%
Load Average *
62
61.3
1%
55
11%
69.1
-11%
60.2 (18.5 - 164, n=951)
3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
58
49.2
15%
57.8
-0%
Load Maximum *
64
69.4
-8%
63.4
1%
88
-38%
78.4 (20.1 - 329, n=956)
-23%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
11h 34min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6h 08min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
1h 9min
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250, 41 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, 48 Wh
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 48 Wh
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 42 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Batterijduur
49%
31%
1%
-4%
Reader / Idle
694
1281
85%
773
11%
655
-6%
426 (73 - 2085, n=915)
-39%
WiFi v1.3
368
505
37%
414
13%
306
-17%
374 (96 - 942, n=290)
2%
Load
69
87
26%
117
70%
86
25%
86.1 (32 - 238, n=920)
25%
H.264
495
388
378 (114 - 1053, n=114)

Pro

+ hoogwaardige indruk (materialen, bouwkwaliteit)
+ contrastrijk en helder scherm
+ compacte afmetingen
+ licht
+ stijlvol design

Contra

- ietwat beperkte connectiviteit
- toetsenbord zou beter mogen
- backlight-bleeding
- ventilator maakt vervelend geluid
Getest: de HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng laptop. Testtoestel voorzien door notebooksbilliger.de.
Getest: de HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng laptop. Testtoestel voorzien door notebooksbilliger.de.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De Pavilion 14-ce3040ng maakt een goede eerste indruk.

De stijlvolle behuizing, die deels van aluminium is, maakte indruk met zijn lichte en compacte design. Dit zorgt ervoor dat het toestel bijzonder geschikt is voor gebruik onderweg.

Zijn helder en contrastrijk scherm is nog een verkoopargument waarmee de 14-incher zich onderscheidt van de concurrentie. Anderzijds zijn de invoerapparatuur, connectiviteit en batterijduur van eerder matige kwaliteit.

HP heeft echter een grote fout gemaakt met de ventilator, die bijna 40 dB(A) bereikt in idle-modus en bijna 50 dB(A) onder belasting. Zoals de zaken er nu voor staan, zouden we aanraden om elders te kijken, tenzij een luide en vervelende ventilator je niet afschrikt.

HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng - 14-05-2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Behuizing
75 / 98 → 77%
Toetsenbord
73%
Aanwijsapparaat
81%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
52 / 80 → 65%
Gewicht
68 / 20-72 → 93%
Batterij
70 / 95 → 73%
Beeldscherm
84%
Gaming-performance
62 / 90 → 69%
Applicatie-performance
90 / 90 → 100%
Temperatuur
87%
Luidheid
64 / 95 → 67%
Audio
75%
Camera
35 / 85 → 41%
Gemiddelde
71%
78%
Multimedia - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

HP Pavilion 14
HP Pavilion 14
HP Pavilion 14
HP Pavilion 14
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport HP Pavilion 14 Laptop: een stijlvolle alleskunner met een helder scherm
Florian Glaser, 2020-01-24 (Update: 2020-01-24)
Alex Alderson
Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - News Editor - @aldersonaj