Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Ematic EWT117 (Atom x5-Z8350) Convertible

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 06-04-2019

Goed scherm, maar veel te traag. De 11.6-inch Ematic heeft op papier heel wat te bieden, maar blijkt in de praktijk niet snel genoeg voor zelfs de meest eenvoudige taken zoals browsen, 1080p-streaming of zelfs tekstverwerking. Je kan je 200 euro beter elders investeren.

Ematic EWT117
Grafische kaart
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Core: 400 MHz, Geheugen: 533 MHz, DDR3, 20.19.15.4703
Geheugen
2048 MB 
, DDR3, 533.3 MHz, 8-10-11-23, Single-Channel
Beeldscherm
11.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 190 PPI, Capacitief, LC116LF3L01, IPS
Moederbord
AMI Corporation Cherry Trail CR
Opslag
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
Geluidskaart
Intel SST Audio Device
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm combo, Card Reader: MicroSD, Sensoren: Gyroscoop
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Realtek RTL8723BS (b/g/n), Bluetooth Yes
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 18 x 278 x 189
Batterij
30.4 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 0.3 MPix
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Stereo, Toetsenbord: Chiclet, Toetsenbordverlichting: nee, 12 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
1.04 kg, Voeding: 65 g
Prijs
180 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

303.8 mm 207.9 mm 20.75 mm 1.4 kg294 mm 204 mm 17.9 mm 1.3 kg286 mm 193 mm 16.9 mm 980 g287 mm 200 mm 15.9 mm 1.3 kg278 mm 189 mm 18 mm 1 kg280 mm 190 mm 15 mm 1.2 kg
Voor: geen connectiviteit
Voor: geen connectiviteit
Links: voeding, USB 3.0, mini-HDMI
Links: voeding, USB 3.0, mini-HDMI
Rechts: Power-knop, MicroSD-lezer, USB 2.0, 3.5-mm-koptelefoon
Rechts: Power-knop, MicroSD-lezer, USB 2.0, 3.5-mm-koptelefoon
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
59.88 MB/s ∼100% +387%
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
59.5 MB/s ∼99% +384%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR-81D2005JGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
35.2 MB/s ∼59% +186%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.9 MB/s ∼47% +127%
Ematic EWT117
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
12.3 MB/s ∼21%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
85.86 MB/s ∼100% +270%
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
67.5 MB/s ∼79% +191%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37.17 MB/s ∼43% +60%
Trekstor Yourbook C11B
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
25.8 MB/s ∼30% +11%
Ematic EWT117
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
23.2 MB/s ∼27%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Trekstor Yourbook C11B
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
307 (min: 297, max: 318) MBit/s ∼100% +894%
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
300 MBit/s ∼98% +871%
Asus E203MA-FD825TS
Wireless AC-9461
289 (min: 204, max: 340) MBit/s ∼94% +835%
Ematic EWT117
Realtek RTL8723BS
30.9 MBit/s ∼10%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Trekstor Yourbook C11B
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
330 (min: 274, max: 339) MBit/s ∼100% +817%
Asus E203MA-FD825TS
Wireless AC-9461
330 (min: 247, max: 394) MBit/s ∼100% +817%
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
310 MBit/s ∼94% +761%
Ematic EWT117
Realtek RTL8723BS
36 MBit/s ∼11%
201.7
cd/m²
202.8
cd/m²
198
cd/m²
193.9
cd/m²
194.6
cd/m²
193.7
cd/m²
179.3
cd/m²
189
cd/m²
181.9
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 202.8 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 192.8 cd/m² Minimum: 32.11 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 88 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 194.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 556:1 (Zwart: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 2.11
ΔE Greyscale 9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
94.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Ematic EWT117
LC116LF3L01, IPS, 11.6, 1920x1080
Asus E203MA-FD825TS
AUO225C, TN LED, 11.6, 1366x768
Trekstor Yourbook C11B
LC116LF1L01, IPS, 11.6, 1920x1080
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
BOE CQ NT116WHM-N42, TN LED, 11.6, 1366x768
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP
AU Optronics AUO-B116XTN02.5 , TN LED, 11.6, 1366x768
Dell Latitude 3189
AU Optronics AUO235C B116XAT, IPS, 11.6, 1366x768
Response Times
30%
-26%
-12%
-34%
-4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38.4 (19.6, 18.8)
41 (22, 19)
-7%
42 (21, 21)
-9%
50 (30, 20)
-30%
72.8 (30.4, 42.4)
-90%
40 (18.8, 21.2)
-4%
Response Time Black / White *
29.6 (18.4, 11.2)
10 (6, 4)
66%
32 (18, 14)
-8%
14 (9, 5)
53%
22.8 (16.4, 6.4)
23%
30.4 (16.4, 14)
-3%
PWM Frequency
500 (25)
200 (20)
-60%
200 (90)
-60%
Screen
-25%
21%
-28%
-32%
49%
Brightness middle
194.6
235
21%
304
56%
224
15%
266.2
37%
291
50%
Brightness
193
227
18%
267
38%
213
10%
251
30%
284
47%
Brightness Distribution
88
93
6%
77
-12%
80
-9%
90
2%
92
5%
Black Level *
0.35
0.44
-26%
0.28
20%
0.52
-49%
0.67
-91%
0.16
54%
Contrast
556
534
-4%
1086
95%
431
-22%
397
-29%
1819
227%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
8
11.73
-47%
7.28
9%
11.64
-46%
12.4
-55%
3.4
57%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
13.71
18.8
-37%
12.65
8%
20.8
-52%
24.5
-79%
9.6
30%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.11
3.73
-77%
1.89
10%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
9
12.64
-40%
8.34
7%
13.4
-49%
14.4
-60%
1.8
80%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.61 84%
2.33 94%
2.57 86%
2.16 102%
2.14 103%
CCT
9539 68%
14819 44%
9038 72%
15186 43%
19436 33%
6544 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60.9
34
-44%
60
-1%
38
-38%
37
-39%
42.8
-30%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94.8
54
-43%
92
-3%
61
-36%
59
-38%
67
-29%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
3% / -16%
-3% / 11%
-20% / -24%
-33% / -32%
23% / 40%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
29.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 18.4 ms stijging
↘ 11.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 71 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (25.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
38.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 19.6 ms stijging
↘ 18.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (40.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 500 Hz ≤ 25 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 500 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 25 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 500 Hz is relatief hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen. Er zijn echter rapporten die beweren dat sommige mensen toch flickering met 500 Hz en hoger kunnen waarnemen: opgelet dus.

Ter vergelijking: 52 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9705 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290Tooltip
Ematic EWT117 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 32 GB eMMC Flash; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø84.3 (83.19-88.07)
Trekstor Yourbook C11B HD Graphics 500, N3350, 64 GB eMMC Flash; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø85 (83.2-85.47)
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM UHD Graphics 605, N5000, 128 GB eMMC Flash; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø285 (283.57-285.54)
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP HD Graphics 500, N3350, 64 GB eMMC Flash; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø79.2 (55.56-87.38)
Dell Latitude 3189 HD Graphics 505, N4200, Liteonit CV3-8D128; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø169 (161.27-173.36)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR-81D2005JGE
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
105 Points ∼48% +320%
Dell Latitude 13 7370
Intel Core m5-6Y57
101 Points ∼46% +304%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core M-5Y31
98 Points ∼45% +292%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel Core m3-6Y30
85 Points ∼39% +240%
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
77 Points ∼35% +208%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel Pentium N4200
50 Points ∼23% +100%
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP
Intel Celeron N3350
46 Points ∼21% +84%
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
35 Points ∼16% +40%
Average Intel Atom x5-Z8350
  (25 - 31, n=8)
28.1 Points ∼13% +12%
Ematic EWT117
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
25 Points ∼11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR-81D2005JGE
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
348 Points ∼8% +330%
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
284 Points ∼6% +251%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core M-5Y31
211 Points ∼5% +160%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel Core m3-6Y30
208 Points ∼5% +157%
Dell Latitude 13 7370
Intel Core m5-6Y57
180 Points ∼4% +122%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel Pentium N4200
174 Points ∼4% +115%
Average Intel Atom x5-Z8350
  (81 - 101, n=9)
95.2 Points ∼2% +18%
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP
Intel Celeron N3350
85 Points ∼2% +5%
Ematic EWT117
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
81 Points ∼2%
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
73 Points ∼2% -10%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
81 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
25 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
6.64 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Help
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1399 Points ∼13% +162%
Asus E203MA-FD825TS
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, SanDisk DA4064
1293 Points ∼12% +142%
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP
HD Graphics 500, N3350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
792 Points ∼7% +48%
Trekstor Yourbook C11B
HD Graphics 500, N3350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
780 Points ∼7% +46%
Ematic EWT117
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 32 GB eMMC Flash
534 Points ∼5%
Productivity
Asus E203MA-FD825TS
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, SanDisk DA4064
3039 Points ∼31% +200%
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3029 Points ∼31% +199%
Trekstor Yourbook C11B
HD Graphics 500, N3350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1974 Points ∼20% +95%
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP
HD Graphics 500, N3350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1690 Points ∼17% +67%
Ematic EWT117
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1014 Points ∼10%
Essentials
Asus E203MA-FD825TS
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, SanDisk DA4064
4766 Points ∼45% +131%
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, 128 GB eMMC Flash
4638 Points ∼43% +125%
Trekstor Yourbook C11B
HD Graphics 500, N3350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3118 Points ∼29% +51%
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP
HD Graphics 500, N3350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3092 Points ∼29% +50%
Ematic EWT117
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2062 Points ∼19%
Score
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1934 Points ∼25% +160%
Asus E203MA-FD825TS
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, SanDisk DA4064
1930 Points ∼25% +160%
Trekstor Yourbook C11B
HD Graphics 500, N3350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1208 Points ∼16% +63%
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP
HD Graphics 500, N3350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1150 Points ∼15% +55%
Ematic EWT117
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 32 GB eMMC Flash
743 Points ∼10%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
3550 Points ∼54%
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3525 Points ∼54%
Dell Latitude 3189
HD Graphics 505, N4200, Liteonit CV3-8D128
2993 Points ∼46%
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP
HD Graphics 500, N3350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2634 Points ∼40%
Trekstor Yourbook C11B
HD Graphics 500, N3350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2370 Points ∼36%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
2550 Points ∼42% +114%
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2321 Points ∼38% +95%
Dell Latitude 3189
HD Graphics 505, N4200, Liteonit CV3-8D128
2273 Points ∼37% +91%
Asus E203MA-FD825TS
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, SanDisk DA4064
2070 Points ∼34% +74%
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP
HD Graphics 500, N3350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1810 Points ∼30% +52%
Trekstor Yourbook C11B
HD Graphics 500, N3350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1700 Points ∼28% +43%
Ematic EWT117
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1191 Points ∼20%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1191 punten
Help
Ematic EWT117
32 GB eMMC Flash
Asus E203MA-FD825TS
SanDisk DA4064
Trekstor Yourbook C11B
64 GB eMMC Flash
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
128 GB eMMC Flash
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP
64 GB eMMC Flash
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
274%
105%
131%
87%
Write 4K
8.216
38.28
366%
9.498
16%
14.55
77%
12.19
48%
Read 4K
12.86
12.14
-6%
4.941
-62%
13.4
4%
6.61
-49%
Write Seq
48.87
220.2
351%
114.3
134%
110.1
125%
108.2
121%
Read Seq
141.6
262
85%
262.8
86%
294.9
108%
167.1
18%
Write 4K Q32T1
16.47
45.72
178%
15.3
-7%
14.17
-14%
15.38
-7%
Read 4K Q32T1
17.83
61.05
242%
31.59
77%
36.92
107%
31.28
75%
Write Seq Q32T1
16.72
167.1
899%
111.8
569%
106.4
536%
96.15
475%
Read Seq Q32T1
117.7
211.5
80%
151.5
29%
238.2
102%
134.1
14%
32 GB eMMC Flash
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 117.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 16.72 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 17.83 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 16.47 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 141.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 48.87 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 12.86 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 8.216 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR-81D2005JGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3, 2200U
1066 Points ∼5% +273%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
1014 Points ∼4% +255%
Dell Latitude 13 7370
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y57
985 Points ∼4% +244%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel HD Graphics 505, N4200
751 Points ∼3% +163%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
622 Points ∼3% +117%
Asus E203MA-FD825TS
Intel UHD Graphics 605, N5000
583 Points ∼3% +104%
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP
Intel HD Graphics 500, N3350
499 Points ∼2% +74%
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500
371 Points ∼2% +30%
Average Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
  (204 - 554, n=21)
354 Points ∼2% +24%
Ematic EWT117
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350
286 Points ∼1%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR-81D2005JGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3, 2200U
1239 Points ∼2% +335%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
1186 Points ∼2% +316%
Dell Latitude 13 7370
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y57
992 Points ∼2% +248%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel HD Graphics 505, N4200
804 Points ∼2% +182%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
714 Points ∼1% +151%
Asus E203MA-FD825TS
Intel UHD Graphics 605, N5000
639 Points ∼1% +124%
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
Intel UHD Graphics 605, N5000
626 Points ∼1% +120%
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP
Intel HD Graphics 500, N3350
482 Points ∼1% +69%
Average Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
  (285 - 494, n=21)
322 Points ∼1% +13%
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500
305 Points ∼1% +7%
Ematic EWT117
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350
285 Points ∼1%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel HD Graphics 505, N4200
103 Points ∼1%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
735 Points ∼2%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel HD Graphics 505, N4200
606 Points ∼1%
Dell Latitude 13 7370
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y57
565 Points ∼1%
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
Intel UHD Graphics 605, N5000
437 Points ∼1%
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP
Intel HD Graphics 500, N3350
364 Points ∼1%
Average Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
  (193 - 281, n=3)
233 Points ∼1%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
6078 Points ∼3%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30
5510 Points ∼3%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel HD Graphics 505, N4200
4738 Points ∼3%
Dell Latitude 13 7370
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y57
4658 Points ∼3%
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
Intel UHD Graphics 605, N5000
3349 Points ∼2%
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP
Intel HD Graphics 500, N3350
3037 Points ∼2%
Average Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
  (1537 - 2272, n=8)
1851 Points ∼1%
Dell Venue 8 Pro 5855
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500
1840 Points ∼1%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Dell Latitude 13 7370
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y57
29811 Points ∼4%
Dell Latitude 3189
Intel HD Graphics 505, N4200
28843 Points ∼4%
3DMark 11 Performance
320 punten
Help
Max. Belasting
 42 °C27.6 °C24.6 °C 
 33 °C27.6 °C24 °C 
 26.2 °C24.4 °C23.4 °C 
Maximum: 42 °C
Gemiddelde: 28.1 °C
24.4 °C29.6 °C42.8 °C
24.2 °C27.6 °C37.2 °C
24 °C24.6 °C28.6 °C
Maximum: 42.8 °C
Gemiddelde: 29.2 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  33 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20.4 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22 to 57 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.1 °C / 104 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.2 °C / 79.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.6 °C / 83.5 F (+2.4 °C / 4.3 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.241.72541.342.53143.942.24040.242.95037.841.96337.8438036.544.110036.744.312534.744.216034.745.120033.246.925032.747.831532.649.240031.350.75003153.963030.259.680030.466.1100029.672.6125029.173.716002972.8200028.667.9250028.571.7315028.266.840002873.7500027.978.1630027.978.4800027.771.71000027.672.41250027.568.81600027.455.1SPL41.185.2N4.259.1median 29.1median 66.8Delta2.110.835.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseEmatic EWT117Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Ematic EWT117 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.44 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 2.2 / 2.5 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 4.2 / 7 / 8.5 Watt
Belasting midlight 9.4 / 11 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Ematic EWT117
Z8350, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6
Asus E203MA-FD825TS
N5000, UHD Graphics 605, SanDisk DA4064, TN LED, 1366x768, 11.6
Trekstor Yourbook C11B
N3350, HD Graphics 500, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
N5000, UHD Graphics 605, 128 GB eMMC Flash, TN LED, 1366x768, 11.6
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP
N3350, HD Graphics 500, 64 GB eMMC Flash, TN LED, 1366x768, 11.6
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2304x1440, 12
Power Consumption
10%
-18%
-8%
15%
-22%
Idle Minimum *
4.2
1.9
55%
3.2
24%
2.3
45%
2.8
33%
2.7
36%
Idle Average *
7
3.5
50%
6.1
13%
4.2
40%
4.2
40%
2.7
61%
Idle Maximum *
8.5
3.9
54%
7
18%
5.4
36%
5.1
40%
7.2
15%
Load Average *
9.4
12.7
-35%
15.4
-64%
11.8
-26%
22
-134%
Load Maximum *
11
19
-73%
24.7
-125%
21.4
-95%
12.1
-10%
20.5
-86%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4h 00min
Ematic EWT117
Z8350, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 30.4 Wh
Asus E203MA-FD825TS
N5000, UHD Graphics 605, 38 Wh
Trekstor Yourbook C11B
N3350, HD Graphics 500, 36.48 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
N5000, UHD Graphics 605, 36 Wh
Lenovo Ideapad 120s-11IAP
N3350, HD Graphics 500, 32 Wh
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 41.4 Wh
Batterijduur
106%
109%
135%
81%
109%
Reader / Idle
919
WiFi v1.3
240
495
106%
502
109%
565
135%
434
81%
501
109%
Load
230
231

Pro

+ geïntegreerde Bluetooth, webcam, microfoon
+ degelijk 1080p-IPS-scherm
+ ~95 procent sRGB-dekking
+ volledig stil
+ erg goedkoop
+ MicroSD-lezer

Contra

- pijnlijk trage systeemprestaties
- oneffen trackpad
- suboptimale positie van webcam
- zwakke SSD-prestaties
- adapter met korte kabel
- Space-toets geeft weinig feedback
- alleen mini-HDMI
- geen USB Type-C
- trage WiFi
Getest: Ematic EWT117BL. Testmodel voorzien door Ematic
Getest: Ematic EWT117BL. Testmodel voorzien door Ematic

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De Ematic EWT117 is een klassiek voorbeeld van te veel beloven voor te weinig geld. Een volwaardige Windows 10 convertible-laptop met een MicroSD-lezer, HDMI-poort en 1080p-IPS-touchscreen voor minder dan 180 euro - en zonder grote minpunten - is nog altijd te mooi om waar te zijn. In dit geval is het systeem ongelooflijk traag door zowel zijn Atom-CPU als de erg trage SSD-prestaties. Zelfs eenvoudige acties zoals tekstverwerking of video's afspelen - waar de Ematic eigenlijk in zou moeten uitblinken - verlopen tergend traag.

Ons toestel vertoonde ook een aantal hardware-problemen. De trackpad veroorzaakte geregeld onverwachte sprongen van de muiscursor en onze MicroSD-kaart zat soms vast in de MicroSD-lezer

Het hoogtepunt van de Ematic - gezien de prijs - is zijn 1080p-IPS-touchscreen die een verrassend breed kleurenpalet (95 procent sRGB) kan weergeven. Helaas betekent dit weinig aangezien de rest van het systeem ondermaats is.

We vragen niet veel van een touchscreen-netbook van minder dan 200 euro. Echter, als zelfs een goedkope Android-tablet sneller werkt dan de Ematic om te browsen, typen en video's af te spelen, wordt het wel erg moeilijk om de EWT117 aan te bevelen aan de meeste thuisgebruikers.

Ematic EWT117 - 06-04-2019 v6
Allen Ngo

Behuizing
51 /  98 → 52%
Toetsenbord
56%
Aanwijsapparaat
44%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
34 / 80 → 43%
Gewicht
75 / 35-78 → 92%
Batterij
75%
Beeldscherm
80%
Gaming-performance
29 / 68 → 43%
Applicatie-performance
34 / 87 → 39%
Temperatuur
91 / 91 → 100%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
20 / 91 → 22%
Camera
24 / 85 → 28%
Gemiddelde
55%
69%
Subnotebook - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Ematic EWT117 (Atom x5-Z8350) Convertible
Allen Ngo, 2019-04- 6 (Update: 2019-04- 6)