Kort testrapport Asus ZenFone 3 ZE552KL Smartphone
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, max. video-opname 1080p aan 30 fps
Top 10 Testrapporten
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Gaming Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000De beste notebookbeeldschermen zoals getest door Notebookcheck
» De beste notebookbeeldschermen
» Top Windows Alternatieven voor de MacBook Pro 13
» Top Windows Alternatieven voor de MacBook Pro 15
» Top Windows alternatieven voor de MacBook 12 en Air
» Top 10 best verkopende notebooks op Amazon
» Top 10 Convertible Notebooks
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets tot € 250
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Phablets (>90cm²)
» Top 10 Camera Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €500
» Top 10 best verkopende smartphones op Amazon
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL |
|
Helderheidsverdeling: 93 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 658 cd/m²
Contrast: 997:1 (Zwart: 0.66 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
Gamma: 2.26
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50 | OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50 | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.20 | Honor 8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20 | ZTE Axon 7 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.50 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -9% | 18% | -6% | -18% | |
Brightness middle | 658 | 419 -36% | 378 -43% | 451 -31% | 328 -50% |
Brightness | 633 | 431 -32% | 380 -40% | 443 -30% | 334 -47% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 84 -10% | 91 -2% | 93 0% | 88 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.66 | 0.4 39% | |||
Contrast | 997 | 1128 13% | |||
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 4.9 | 4.1 16% | 1.95 60% | 5.4 -10% | 4.6 6% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 9.1 | 12 -32% | 3.09 66% | 9.9 -9% | 14.7 -62% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 5.8 | 3.3 43% | 1.86 68% | 6.7 -16% | 2.8 52% |
Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.1 105% | 2.13 103% | 2.33 94% | 2.29 96% |
CCT | 7840 83% | 6550 99% | 6376 102% | 8262 79% | 6612 98% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 89.38 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 |
* ... kleiner is beter
Responstijd Scherm
↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit | ||
---|---|---|
36 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 15 ms stijging | |
↘ 21 ms daling | ||
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (24.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. | ||
↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs | ||
56 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 17 ms stijging | |
↘ 39 ms daling | ||
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (38.5 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen | |||
Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9732 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz waargenomen. |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Honor 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
OnePlus 3 |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Honor 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Honor 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Honor 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Honor 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Honor 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Honor 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
OnePlus 3 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Honor 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Honor 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
OnePlus 3 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Honor 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Honor 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
OnePlus 3 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Honor 8 | |
OnePlus 3 |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Honor 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
OnePlus 3 |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Honor 8 | |
ZTE Axon 7 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Honor 8 | |
ZTE Axon 7 |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Honor 8 | |
ZTE Axon 7 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Honor 8 | |
ZTE Axon 7 |
* ... kleiner is beter
AndroBench 3-5 | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
Honor 8 | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
Honor 8 | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Random Write 4KB (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Honor 8 | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Random Read 4KB (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Honor 8 | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Sequential Write 256KB (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Honor 8 | |
ZTE Axon 7 | |
Sequential Read 256KB (sorteer op waarde) | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL | |
OnePlus 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Honor 8 | |
ZTE Axon 7 |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Instellingen | Waarde | ||
high | 29 fps | ||
very low | 29 fps |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
ZTE Axon 7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.05 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Honor 8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
OnePlus 3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.61 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Uit / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Inactief | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Belasting |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -12% | 9% | -7% | -5% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.83 | 0.57 31% | 0.96 -16% | 0.78 6% | 0.64 23% |
Idle Average * | 2.11 | 1.24 41% | 1.64 22% | 1.89 10% | 0.84 60% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.12 | 1.36 36% | 1.71 19% | 2.02 5% | 0.87 59% |
Load Average * | 3.41 | 5.92 -74% | 2.98 13% | 5.28 -55% | 6.02 -77% |
Load Maximum * | 5.46 | 10.53 -93% | 5.08 7% | 5.44 -0% | 10.45 -91% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 3000 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 2900 mAh | Honor 8 3000 mAh | ZTE Axon 7 3250 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Batterijduur | -9% | 11% | -27% | -21% | |
Reader / Idle | 1502 | 1338 -11% | 2323 55% | 1487 -1% | 1735 16% |
H.264 | 905 | 847 -6% | 672 -26% | 526 -42% | 704 -22% |
WiFi v1.3 | 797 | 840 5% | 626 -21% | 499 -37% | 411 -48% |
Load | 352 | 268 -24% | 483 37% | 255 -28% | 245 -30% |
Pro
Contra
Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.
Asus legt een erg stijlvolle 5.5-inch-smartphone op tafel die ook met zijn interne onderdelen weet te overtuigen. Met Qualcomm's Snapdragon 625 octa-core-processor en 4 GB RAM heeft de ZenFone meer dan genoeg rekenkracht voor alle moderne applicaties en games. Daarnaast beschikt het toestel over een erg helder Full-HD-scherm met stabiele kijkhoeken en een 16-megapixel-camera die prima foto's maakt. Andere features zijn LTE, een dual-SIM-slot, Type-C-USB-poort met Quick Charge-technologie en een vingerafdruklezer. Asus vervolledigt het succesvolle totaalpakket met het nieuwste Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow onder een laagje van de nieuwe versie van zijn ZenUI-interface. De lange batterijduur en beperkte temperatuurontwikkeling bij gebruik zijn eveneens vermeldenswaardig.
Asus heeft met zijn ZenFone 3 een designer-stuk ontwikkeld. De mid-range smartphone ziet er veel duurder uit dan hij in werkelijkheid is.
Er valt weinig te bekritiseren. De Android-knoppen onder het scherm hebben geen backlight en de overdracht van data via WiFi voelt redelijk traag aan. Asus is ook iets te royaal met de software-configuratie en installeert onnodig veel apps op de smartphone. In onze test slaagden we er niet in om apps te verplaatsen naar onze micro-SD-kaarten aangezien deze niet geformatteerd konden worden als intern geheugen.
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL - 21-10-2016 v5.1(old)
Manuel Masiero