Honor 400 Lite
Laptopspecificaties

Secundaire Camera: 16 MPix
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 29 score (van 56 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Honor 400 Lite
Bron: Stuff TV

If more devices like the Honor 400 Lite came our way at this price tag (or less), we'd probably find ourselves inventing things to complain about to keep the snarky Stuff soul alive. Being one of the few exceptions to the mid-range smartphone rule, the 400 Lite backs it all up with a generous AMOLED display and overachieving battery that'll more than make up for the underperforming innards and camera.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 07-08-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 81% prijs: 90% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Expert Reviews

I’m not a fan of Honor doubling down on the Apple cosplay. It feels like a lack of confidence in the product, which is madness because, as far as budget phones go, the Honor 400 Lite is one of the best. Performance and battery life are better than last year, the main camera is still a decent shooter, its IP65 rating means it’s more robust and that new 120Hz display makes everything feel lovely and smooth in use. Plus, of course, the software support is fantastic. I could have done without the superfluous camera button and the backup cameras aren’t up to the same standard as the main one, but otherwise, it’s extremely well-rounded. For £250, it’s a good amount of phone, and delivers the kind of value for money Apple fans can only dream of. It would, however, be nice to see Honor move away from imitation and commit to establishing its own identity with the next generation.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 21-07-2025
Bron: Techradar

Overall, the Honor 400 Lite is a compelling midrange smartphone that balances innovative AI features with quick access camera features via the AI Button. While it makes a few compromises, particularly with its processor, battery and charging speed, the unique AI Button, comprehensive AI editing suite, and advanced recording capabilities truly set it apart. The trade-offs between the 400 Lite and the more robust X9c highlight Honor's strategic decision to prioritise cutting-edge software and user convenience in this model. For users who value a feature-rich camera experience and smart AI integrations in a manageable form factor, the Honor 400 Lite presents a strong case, offering substantial value for its price. It can be found online starting at R7 500.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 15-07-2025
Bron: Expert Reviews

I’m not a fan of Honor doubling down on the Apple cosplay. It feels like a lack of confidence in the product, which is madness because, as far as budget phones go, the Honor 400 Lite is one of the best. Performance and battery life are better than last year, the main camera is still a decent shooter, its IP65 rating means it’s more robust and that new 120Hz display makes everything feel lovely and smooth in use. Plus, of course, the software support is fantastic. I could have done without the superfluous camera button and the backup cameras aren’t up to the same standard as the main one, but otherwise, it’s extremely well-rounded. For £250, it’s a good amount of phone, and delivers the kind of value for money Apple fans can only dream of. It would, however, be nice to see Honor move away from imitation and commit to establishing its own identity with the next generation.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 11-07-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Creative Bloq

The Honor 400 Lite found itself on the cusp of something interesting, where in so blindly copying the design of another, it has somehow found itself travelling around the curve and back again at originality. Perhaps it is due to so many smartphones being designed to feel good and look good, but not necessarily to remain comfortable to use after hours of use. The 400 Lite is, well, light and causes no strain, and as such is a small revelation. On top of that, with a good display, decent performance and strong battery life, it certainly has more than a few arrows to its quiver; however, it is not without weaknesses. The camera, for all of its megapixels, does nothing to impress.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 30-06-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Gadgetbyte Nepal

The Honor 400 Lite tries to emulate the iPhone’s premium look at a budget-friendly price of NPR 40,000, and it succeeds in design and display quality. The lightweight build, AMOLED panel, and long-term software support are strong points. However, its average performance, underwhelming cameras, and lackluster video capabilities hold it back. The absence of stereo speakers, Gorilla Glass, and robust haptics further dampens its appeal. At this price, alternatives like the CMF Phone 2 Pro (review) or Redmi Note 14 Pro (review) may offer better performance and camera experience. If you’re drawn to its iPhone-like design and don’t prioritize heavy gaming or photography, the Honor 400 Lite is a decent choice, but it doesn’t fully justify its NPR 40,000 price tag.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 09-06-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 84% prijs: 80% prestatie: 75% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 85%
Bron: Irish Mirror

Honor 400 Lite does a great job of delivering premium iPhone-style features on a budget-priced phone. In 2025, this is a competitive price point with options from Nothing and Samsung offering plenty of alternatives. But anyone who buys this Honor unit should be pleased by the value-for-money feature set.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 02-06-2025
Bron: Canbuyornot

At S$339, the Honor 400 Lite is competitively priced. The Vivo V50 Lite, which is quite similar, but has a larger battery, is S$499. While you get several iPhone-like features, and an iPhone-inspired design, the Honor is a budget mainstream model that's not as capable as Apple's. While I wasn't a fan of the cameras, they can do the job, and the overall experience of using the Honor is good. The general performance, especially, is fine, and the screen is nice. It's pretty good value for the price. It's available now from Lazada and Shopee.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 07-05-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Cool Smartphone

Honor looks like they have set the tone for another series with the 400 Lite, and it is for the most part, a very good base from which to build future devices, as they did with the 200 series last year. Yes there are a few compromises that have been made to get the price to where they needed it to be and these may be deal breakers but for a lot of people, they won’t. I know that if I were looking for a second phone (for work use maybe) or a phone for my family members, then this would defiantly be one on my radar. When looking at competition then you are going to be looking at the likes of the OnePlus Nord CE4 Lite 5G (£199), OnePlus Nord 4 (£399) Samsung Galaxy A26 5G (£249).
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 07-05-2025
Bron: Amateur Photographer

Most can’t justify spending a fortune on an iPhone, but still want the looks and camera handling of one. And that’s where the 400 Lite comes in. You obviously don’t get multiple high-resolution sensors or the speed or image quality of a flagship iPhone. But the Honor’s main camera performs well in most scenarios, sufficient for a beginner taking casual photos. On the whole, the Honor 400 Lite looks good, has a bright screen and a snappy camera button and most importantly, doesn’t break the bank.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 30-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Expert Reviews

Im not a fan of Honor doubling down on the Apple cosplay. It feels like a lack of confidence in the product, which is madness because, as far as budget phones go, the Honor 400 Lite is one of the best. Performance and battery life are better than last year, the main camera is still a decent shooter, its IP65 rating means its more robust and that new 120Hz display makes everything feel lovely and smooth in use. Plus, of course, the software support is fantastic. I could have done without the superfluous camera button and the backup cameras arent up to the same standard as the main one, but otherwise, its extremely well-rounded. For £250, its a good amount of phone, and delivers the kind of value for money Apple fans can only dream of. It would, however, be nice to see Honor move away from imitation and commit to establishing its own identity with the next generation.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 28-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Techradar

The Honor 400 Lite is a fascinating budget Android phone that seems way more enamored with the Apple way of doing things. Its similarity to the iPhone results in a solid handset with some appealing features, including a dedicated camera button and a handy notch widget system. However, the Honor 400 Lite takes its eye off the ball in some key areas, including performance and camera quality.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 25-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prijs: 80% prestatie: 60% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Cool Smartphone

Having used the Honour 400 Lite for a few days now, I can say that it falls firmly into the lower end of the current smartphone market. This is perfectly acceptable, as it aligns with the intended market. However, there are a couple of shortcomings that I’ve noticed. The most significant ones are the single loudspeaker setup and the lack of wireless charging. While these features are not uncommon in high-end or high-priced devices, they are still a downside for this phone. The performance can also be a bit slow at times. However, this may be due to the fact that the phone is currently running on pre-release software, as it is not officially launching until the end of the month. Despite these minor flaws, if you’re looking for a low-cost entry-level smartphone with good battery life and reasonable charging speeds, then the Honour 400 Lite might be worth considering. I’ll provide a more detailed review in the future, after I’ve had a chance to use the phone for a bit longer.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 25-04-2025
Bron: Stuff TV

If the Honor 400 Lite looked any different, it’d be lost in the shuffle. As affordable phones go it’s an alright performer, takes a decent enough photo, and can go all day on a charge – but the same can be said for most of its rivals. The top contenders also excel in one or more areas. The Poco X7 Pro lasts even longer and has more power; the Nothing Phone 3a has unique looks and streamlined software; the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion is way tougher. Honor’s own Magic 7 Lite remains the longevity champ, and you won’t mistake it for an iPhone. But maybe that’s exactly what you want? None of the cheap competition do such a convincing impression of a premium handset. If you don’t mind paying for that design, you’ll be happy enough with what the 400 Lite offers for the cash. A very affordable all-rounder that’s rather shameless in its iPhone inspirations. The Honor 400 Lite appeals to those who like the Apple look, but budget rivals arguably have more unique personalities.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 25-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Tech Spurt

Reviewing the Honor 400 Lite, a budget Android smartphone which beats the iPhone 16 Pro phones for AI smarts and in many other departments! You've even got a more customisable camera button. So is the Honor 400 Lite one of the best affordable Androids in 2025? I've been testing it as my full-time mobile these past few days, and besides the quite basic performance, it's been a decent everyday experience. The DImensity chipset is fine for gaming on Call of Duty, PubG etc, but more intensive titles like Wuthering Waves struggle.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 11-04-2025
Bron: Smartzone

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 24-06-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 95% mobiliteit: 75% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Xataka

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 07-05-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 68% prestatie: 68% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 75% afwerking: 65%
Bron: Hipertextual

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 05-05-2025
Bron: Computerhoy

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 05-05-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 76%
Bron: Androidiani

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 18-04-2025
Bron: Smart World

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 16-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 79% prijs: 70% functionaliteiten: 75% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 85% afwerking: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: Multiplayer IT

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 15-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 65%
Bron: Tutto Android

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 15-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78%
Bron: Andrea Galeazzi

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 14-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75% prijs: 70% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 85%
Bron: Mister Gadget

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 14-04-2025
Bron: Batista70Phone

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 12-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82% functionaliteiten: 80% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 85% afwerking: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 11-04-2025
Bron: Ceotech

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 11-04-2025
Bron: HDblog.it

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 11-04-2025
Beoordeling: prijs: 49% functionaliteiten: 73%
Bron: Charles Tech

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 14-07-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 80% prestatie: 70% functionaliteiten: 90% mobiliteit: 90%
Bron: Journal du Geek

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 16-06-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Frandroid

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 12-05-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prestatie: 60% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Les Mobiles

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 09-05-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Clubic

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 09-05-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60% prestatie: 40% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Les Numeriques

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 06-05-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60% prestatie: 60% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 60% afwerking: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: 01Net

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 06-05-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 52% prijs: 60% mobiliteit: 20%
Bron: Presse Citron

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 06-05-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 64% prijs: 50% prestatie: 50% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: GSM Online PL

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 03-07-2025
Bron: Techno Senior

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 29-06-2025
Bron: ITHardware.pl

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-06-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 65%
Bron: Mobileworld 24

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 24-05-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 74% prijs: 70% prestatie: 66% beeldscherm: 75% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Telepolis

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 12-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Co Nowego

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 07-04-2025
Bron: Root Nation PL

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 07-04-2025
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Helpix

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 30-06-2025
Bron: Yamobi

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 19-06-2025
Bron: Mega Obzor

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 28-05-2025
Bron: Hi-Tech Mail

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 28-05-2025
Bron: 3DNews.ru

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 27-05-2025
Bron: MobilArena HU

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 11-04-2025
Beoordeling: prijs: 80% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Viettelstore

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 21-07-2025
Bron: The Gioididong

Hands-On, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 16-07-2025
Bron: Viettelstore

Hands-On, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 16-07-2025
Bron: Vat Vo Studio

Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 10-07-2025
Bron: Viettelstore

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 01-07-2025
Bron: VNReview

Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 26-06-2025
Commentaar
Imagination IMG BXM-8-256:
De meeste niet-veeleisende huidige games kunnen vloeiend draaien. Wees voorbereid op verminderde grafische weergave door lage detailinstellingen en lage resoluties. Toch verschaffen deze kaarten voldoende prestatie voor kantoor taken en video bekijken (niet voor HD videos).
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
Dimensity 7025: De Dimensity 7020 is een mid-range SoC met een geïntegreerde 5G-modem. Hij bevat twee snelle ARM Cortex-A78 kernen op maximaal 2,2 GHz en zes energiezuinige Cortex-A55 kernen op maximaal 2 GHz. Vergeleken met de Dimensity 930 biedt de 7020 dezelfde specificaties en lijkt het een rebranding te zijn.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
6.70": Er bestaan maar weinig smartphones met een groter scherm.
Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
72.59%: Dit cijfer is slecht. De meeste notebooks hebben een hoger cijfer. Dit is niet aanbevolen bij aankoop.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.