Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
Laptopspecificaties

Secundaire Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, 24 mm, 1/4", 1.12 µm
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 47 score (van 98 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL
As was the case with some previous generations, for this fifth generation Asus ZenFone, the focus is on the cameras. With AI support for everything possible—even the ringtone—and Corning Gorilla Glass covering both sides, buyers should find themselves holding a high-performance, intelligent and rugged smartphone with a dual camera. Read on to find out what level of performance you can expect of this new ZenFone.
Bron: Computer Totaal
 Archive.org version
 Archive.org versionDe Asus Zenfone 5 (ZE620KL) is een goede smartphone voor een hele goede prijs. Absoluut een uitstekende keuze. Dat gezegd hebbende, valt de smartphone een beetje weg ten opzichte van de zware concurrentie zoals de Nokia 7 Plus, die vooral op softwaregebied en accuduur beter scoren. Voor z’n schappelijke prijs krijg je een prima camera en mooi scherm. De bouwkwaliteit is ook hoogwaardig, alleen moet je er wel mee leren leven dat het ontwerp puur kopieerwerk is.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 18-06-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: AndroidWorld.nl
 Archive.org version
 Archive.org versionEen ZenFone 5 kost €399 en is daarmee een toestel uit het middensegment. Voor die positie in de markt presteert dit toestel goed. Alles is wel 'oké' aan het toestel, het scherm, de prestaties en het uiterlijk. Dus wanneer je dit toestel koopt hoef je niet bang te zijn voor een verkeerde keuze. Wanneer we hem wegzetten tegen een toestel in dezelfde categorie komen we snel aan bij de Nokia 7 Plus en dat is dan meteen ook een geduchte concurrent. Vooral de accu van dit toestel gaat veel langer mee. De Asus Zenfone 5 zal denk ik vooral gekocht worden door de fans van het merk en misschien het design.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 09-06-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Anderstalige testrapporten
Bron: Lowyat.net
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionAll in all, I would definitely recommend the ZenFone 5 to anybody looking for a smartphone in the mid-range segment, especially those looking for a device that strikes a balance between performance, entertainment, and smarpthone photography.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 28-08-2018
Bron: Kitguru
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionAt £349.99, the ZenFone 5 is a very solid option to have. Its new design is predictable, but it brings a flagship feel to the phone without adding several hundred pounds to the price tag. It is also £100 cheaper, at launch, than the ZenFone 4 – a smart move which confirms the ZenFone series as a low-to-mid range family, a position I think it is best suited to compete from.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 21-08-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85%
Bron: Trusted Reviews
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionIf you’ve yet to encounter an Asus’ smartphone, the ZenFone 5 might be the device with which to jump on-board. That’s not to say you should leap without trepidation, however.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 11-07-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 80% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 60% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Zdnet.com
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Asus ZenFone 5 is a bit of an enigma. On the outside it looks like a pretty standard handset, but it starts to reveal more as you delve into what's on offer. The various elements under the AI banner are often scattered across different settings, which is a missed opportunity. Asus should bring them together somewhere, even though they aren't really deal-makers.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 11-07-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Android Central
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe ZenFone 5 is an attractive package at an attractive price. It's far enough away from the likes of the OnePlus 6 to be a contender in a true mid-range price bracket, and while questions linger over future software support, the ZenFone 5 is mostly a winner.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 11-07-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Tech PP
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionAsus is no stranger to the smartphone industry’s unforgiving flagship segment. The Taiwanese phone maker has tried its hand at the higher end market by releasing a medley of more expensive variants. However, that didn’t pan out quite as the company hoped it would. Affordability was the key reason Asus’ phones took off and that image didn’t sit well as Asus shifted gears towards the premium league. Now, with a budget hit (ZenFone Max Pro M1) at its back and a seemingly better strategy in place, Asus is ready to make a comeback. And its kicking things off with the new ZenFone 5Z.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 10-07-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85% prijs: 95% prestatie: 90% afwerking: 85%
Bron: Tech Advisor
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe mid-range Android market gets more compelling - and competitive - every year, so it's remarkable that Asus has managed to come out swinging with a handset that offers a £1000 design with a third of the price tag.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 06-07-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Pocket Lint
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionOverall, the Zenfone 5 is a solid backbone mid-price smartphone from which Asus can evolve and progress. It gets enough right to make it worthy of consideration, but with Honor, Moto and Nokia all knocking on Asus' door (often for less money), it's also got its work cut out.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 05-07-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Hardware Zone
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionOverall, the ZenFone 5 offers plenty of flagship features at a very reasonable price. After a misstep with last year's ZenFone 4, I'm happy to see a return to form for the ZenFone brand. If you're looking for great value without feeling like you're settling for a budget device, look no further.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 03-07-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 85% prestatie: 75% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Stuff TV
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionGreat looks, decent performance and a slick, simple version of Android. Camera quality is more of a mixed bag, but this ZenFone is still great value.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 29-06-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Tech Nave
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionSo, did ASUS manage to pull off an AI-driven cameraphone for the midrange? With a super affordable price of RM1299 for the ASUS ZenFone 5 ZE620KL the short answer is a resounding YES! Thanks to the better rounded video features and new AI Scene Detection the ZenFone 5 ZE620KL delivers a more complete AI-driven cameraphone experience but again it is something that could still do with a bit more fine tuning (something ASUS could probably do with coming updates).
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 27-06-2018
Bron: Trusted Reviews
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionAsus isn’t the only company experimenting with AI optimisations, however. HTC and Huawei have also been pushing the tech for a while now. But if the features operate in the way that Asus is claiming, then the ZenFone 5 could carve a unique place for itself in the mid-range market, where currently camera performance is still very hit-and-miss.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 26-06-2018
Bron: Tech Advisor
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionWe’ve only had brief time with the ZenFone 5, and many of its most exciting software features either weren’t quite ready to test, or - like the AI stuff - are simply impossible to review without extended time with the device.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 26-06-2018
Bron: Hardware Zone
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionOverall, the ZenFone 5 offers plenty of flagship features at a very reasonable price. After a misstep with last year's ZenFone 4, I'm happy to see a return to form for the ZenFone brand. If you're looking for great value without feeling like you're settling for a budget device, look no further.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 23-05-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 85% prestatie: 75% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Yugatech
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe ASUS ZenFone series first earned its reputation by having phones with good specs at reasonable price tags. The ZenFone 5 (ZE620KL) is certainly one of those devices. For under Php20K, it offers a large high-resolution display, powerful Snapdragon 636 chipset, 4GB of RAM, good dual-rear cameras, and Android Oreo out of the box. The company may have flopped with the ZenFone 4, but with the ZenFone 5, it looks like they’re getting back on track.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 23-04-2018
Bron: Yugatech
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionA couple of days ago, ASUS launched its ZenFone 5 lineup here in the country. You’ve read and watched our review on the most affordable one in the lineup, the ZenFone 5Q. Now, it’s about time to put the main star to the test: the ZenFone 5 (ZE620KL) itself.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 23-04-2018
Bron: Manila Shaker
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionOverall, this is a good smartphone for its price and is definitely worth the hype. Though we’re not saying that this is a perfect smartphone – because it’s not. It has its shortcomings and we hope Asus will improve them over time. (Put a hide notch option, please!).
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 23-04-2018
Bron: Unbox
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionAfter two years of pricing mis-steps, ASUS finally has a solid mid-range offering in the ZF5. Retailing at just under 20K at Php 19,995, the ZF5 is worthy comeback phone for the Taiwanese brand that has managed to rekindle the old flame that many of its previous (and current) users felt when they first announced the ZF2 and ZF2 Deluxe. The design may have been heavily influenced by a more premium brand, but there’s no denying the value that consumers get at the price point.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 23-04-2018
Bron: Hardware Zone
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionASUS uses a combination of 52 different expressions to mimic yours, and it can also be used in video calls or live streams on social media. The company doesn't use a 3D depth camera for this, and it's instead trained its algorithm on hundreds of thousands of 2D faces with different expressions, lighting conditions, and angles. The algorithm then makes use of this data to approximate a 3D model of your face.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 15-04-2018
Bron: Hardware Zone
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionASUS today took the wraps off the latest phone in its ZenFone series, and in some ways I’m not even surprised by what I’m seeing.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 02-03-2018
Bron: NDTV Gadgets
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionAsus might be the first mainstream manufacturer to emulate Apple’s iPhone X notch on Android, but it won’t be the last. Whether or not people like this new direction, they’re sure to be talking about it, and that’s what Asus needs. Stay tuned to Gadgets 360 for news of when the Asus ZenFone 5 and 5z are going to launch in India, and what their prices will be. We’ll also have full reviews complete with rundowns of the cameras, batteries, and overall performance of each model.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 01-03-2018
Bron: Hardware Zone
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe ZenFone 5Z will retail for €479, so ASUS is looking to be one of the most affordable flagships with a Snapdragon 845 SoC. The 5Z is slated to be available in June.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 28-02-2018
Bron: GSM Arena
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionTempting pricing is what probably raises the potential for success of the new Asus Zenfones. The Zenfone 5 and 5z impress with notched full-screens and well-specked main camera, while the Lite model has not three but four cameras and a trendy screen. The Max (M1) brings long-lasting Oreo experience and dual-camera on the cheap.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 28-02-2018
Bron: Tech Nave
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionWe're expecting the ASUS ZenFone 5 ZE620KL, ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL and ZenFone 5 Lite ZC600KL to arrive in Malaysia in late March to April 2018. If the ZenFone 5Z comes in priced around RM2200 with a Snapdragon 845 processor, would you get it? Anyone interested in the other two ZenFone 5 smartphones? Discuss on our Facebook page and stay tuned to TechNave.com.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 28-02-2018
Bron: Tech Advisor
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionFinally, there's AI Charging, which will learn from how you charge your phone to help preserve the battery in the long term. For example, if you often keep your phone plugged in overnight, AI Charging will top it up to 80 percent and keep it there until early in the morning, before bringing it all the way to full just before you wake up, which Asus claims could as much as double the battery's lifespan.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 27-02-2018
Bron: Techradar
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionAsus has made an incredibly beautiful looking device here and if the pricing is right, it could be a flagship competitor to watch out for. That said, it does look like one particular phone already on the market.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 27-02-2018
Bron: Lowyat.net
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionIn retrospect, the new ZenFone 5 phones are really Asus’ most exciting phones yet. They’re well-designed – albeit not very original – they look and feel premium, and their software is quite possibly Asus’ most polished version of Android yet.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 27-02-2018
Bron: Pocket Lint
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe ZenFone 5 won't be to everyone's taste, but the design is excellent and there's some great tech at work here. We're expecting it to be competitively priced, too.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 27-02-2018
Bron: Stuff TV
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionWe’re not yet convinced by the camera scene recognition - it’s something digital cameras have been doing for years, after all - but last year’s ZenFone 4 delivered great photos for the price. Hopefully it’s a case of more of the same for 2018.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 27-02-2018
Bron: Mobile Syrup
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionIn the briefing experience, the ZenFone 5 Lite handled well and once again presented as a much more premium device than the specs would have you expect. The camera and other apps were quick and responsive, and it took excellent pictures — albeit not quite as good as the ZenFone 5.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 27-02-2018
Bron: Chip.de
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 24-09-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 89% prestatie: 91% functionaliteiten: 92% beeldscherm: 92% mobiliteit: 81%
Bron: Tech Stage
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 21-09-2018
Bron: Chip.de
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 12-07-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 89% prestatie: 91% functionaliteiten: 92% beeldscherm: 92% mobiliteit: 81%
Bron: Curved
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 27-02-2018
Bron: Computerhoy
 ES→NL Archive.org version
 ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 22-08-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 71% functionaliteiten: 70% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: El Androide Libre
 ES→NL Archive.org version
 ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 16-07-2018
Bron: Hispazone
 ES→NL Archive.org version
 ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 02-06-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100% prestatie: 100% beeldscherm: 100% mobiliteit: 100% afwerking: 100%
Bron: Xataka
 ES→NL Archive.org version
 ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 23-05-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prestatie: 85% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 75% afwerking: 88%
Bron: Geeknetic
 ES→NL Archive.org version
 ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 18-05-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Hipertextual
 ES→NL Archive.org version
 ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 08-05-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75%
Bron: Mi Mundo Gadget
 ES→NL Archive.org version
 ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 23-04-2018
Bron: Android Geek
 PT→NL Archive.org version
 PT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 14-06-2018
Bron: Android Geek
 PT→NL Archive.org version
 PT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 07-06-2018
Bron: AndroidPit.it
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 17-11-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: HDblog.it
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 08-11-2018
Beoordeling: prijs: 62% functionaliteiten: 81%
Bron: Notebook Italia
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 13-07-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 76% prijs: 80% functionaliteiten: 80% beeldscherm: 60% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Tech Different
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 08-07-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 79% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 85% ergonomie: 70%
Bron: Esperienza Mobile
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 03-07-2018
Bron: Notebook Italia
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 23-06-2018
Bron: Techzilla.it
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 13-06-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 79% prijs: 85% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Everyeye.it
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 11-06-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85%
Bron: Androidiani
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 09-06-2018
Bron: Chimera Revo
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 29-05-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 81% prijs: 90% functionaliteiten: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: Smartphone Italia
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 14-05-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 80% functionaliteiten: 80% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: Leonardo.it Tech
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 08-05-2018
Bron: Pianeta Cellulare
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 04-05-2018
Bron: Tutto Android
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 28-04-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83% prijs: 80% functionaliteiten: 82% beeldscherm: 84% mobiliteit: 86% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: HDblog.it
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 26-04-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 81%
Bron: Andrea Galeazzi
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 23-04-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83% prijs: 80% beeldscherm: 83% mobiliteit: 85% afwerking: 89%
Bron: AndroidWorld.it
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 23-04-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82% prijs: 75% functionaliteiten: 80% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 75% afwerking: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: Pianeta Cellulare
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 19-04-2018
Bron: Smartphone Italia
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 18-04-2018
Bron: AndroidWorld.it
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 27-02-2018
Bron: Techstation.it
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 27-02-2018
Bron: AndroidPit.fr
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 04-11-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Hitek
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 22-08-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78% prijs: 80% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 70%
Bron: Top for Phone
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 02-07-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prestatie: 60%
Bron: Erenumerique
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 25-06-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Frandroid
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 10-06-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 70%
Bron: 01Net
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-06-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 84% prestatie: 80% mobiliteit: 90%
Bron: Frandroid
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 06-05-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Frandroid
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 02-03-2018
Bron: CNet France
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 28-02-2018
Bron: Galaktyczny
 PL→NL Archive.org version
 PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 26-08-2018
Bron: Antyweb
 PL→NL Archive.org version
 PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 25-07-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Komputerswiat
 PL→NL Archive.org version
 PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 12-07-2018
Bron: Tekno Seyir
 TR→NL Archive.org version
 TR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 18-08-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: DGL.ru
 RU→NL Archive.org version
 RU→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 22-07-2018
Bron: i2Hard
 RU→NL Archive.org version
 RU→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 07-07-2018
Bron: Hi-Tech Mail
 RU→NL Archive.org version
 RU→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 04-05-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 68% prestatie: 60% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 60% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Product Test
 RU→NL Archive.org version
 RU→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 02-03-2018
Bron: CNews.cz
 CZ→NL Archive.org version
 CZ→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 20-08-2018
Bron: Svet Androida
 CZ→NL Archive.org version
 CZ→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-06-2018
Bron: CZC
 CZ→NL Archive.org version
 CZ→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 16-06-2018
Bron: XT Mobile
 VN→NL Archive.org version
 VN→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 25-07-2018
Bron: The Gioididong
 VN→NL Archive.org version
 VN→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 06-03-2018
Bron: Jagat Review
 ID→NL Archive.org version
 ID→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 28-05-2018
Bron: Pemmzchannel
 ID→NL Archive.org version
 ID→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 27-05-2018
Bron: Dinside
 NO→NL Archive.org version
 NO→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 07-06-2018
Bron: Tek.no
 NO→NL Archive.org version
 NO→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 06-06-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Alt om Data
 DA→NL Archive.org version
 DA→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 08-08-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prijs: 70% prestatie: 70%
Bron: Mere Mobil.dk
 DA→NL Archive.org version
 DA→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 29-05-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 67%
Bron: Mobil.se
 SV→NL Archive.org version
 SV→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 12-06-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 72%
Bron: M3 PC för alla
 SV→NL Archive.org version
 SV→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 08-05-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Unlimited Tech
 →NL Archive.org version
 →NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 24-09-2018
Beoordeling: Totale score: 88%
Bron: Computerblog.ro
 →NL Archive.org version
 →NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 25-06-2018
Commentaar
Qualcomm Adreno 509:
Alleen oudere games kunnen vloeiend draaien met deze grafische chips (als ze niet veeleisend zijn). Gedeeld geheugen grafische cores in deze categorie hebben het voordeel van minder warmte-ontwikkeling en langere batterijlooptijd. Voor kantoor, internet, beeldcorrectie- en videomonteringswerk zijn deze grafische chips nog steeds bruikbaar zonder enige beperkingen.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
SD 636:
Mid-range octa-core-SoC met acht Kryo-260 CPU-cores geklokt aan max. 1.8 GHz, een Adreno 509-GPU, een LPDDR4-2666-geheugencontroller en een X12-LTE-modem (Cat 13/12, 300 / 150 Mbps). Gefabriceerd in het moderne 14nm-proces.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.


