Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Laptopspecificaties

Secundaire Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2, 1.12µm
Pricecompare
Gemiddelde van 15 score (van 28 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Bron: Trusted Reviews

At a price of just £199 – and likely cheaper, given Xiaomi’s love of a sale – the Redmi Pad SE is one of the most affordable full-sized tablets on the market. It certainly looks and feels like a more expensive tablet, with a tidy all-metal build. Its display is big and fluid too, and together with good quad speakers, it’s a decent portable video streaming tool. Special mention, too, for the Redmi Pad SE’s stamina, which is capable of carrying you through multiple days on a single charge. However, hamstrung performance, sluggish charging, and mediocre software keep this tablet feeling its price tag whenever you try to do much beyond simple streaming. It’s useful, but in a very limited sense.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 08-11-2023
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Tech Advisor

Overall, I’ve really enjoyed my experience with the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE. The powerful speakers mean that streaming sounds great, and the screen is also great to use indoors. Plus, it doesn’t run out of battery easily. Sure, the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE makes compromises in some areas – all budget tablets do to keep the costs down. However, these shortcomings are all in the right areas, such as the cameras and charging speeds. If you want a tablet just for videos and day-to-day tasks and don’t want to spend a lot of money, then this is a stellar choice.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 02-11-2023
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Unbox

Despite some of the compromises made to make it more affordable, the Redmi Pad SE is a decent budget tablet in the Philippines. This is made better with its use of MIUI 14 which has a better optimization for tablets.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 26-10-2023
Bron: Tech X Reviews

The Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE has recently made its debut in the global market, presenting an enticing entry-level tablet option for consumers. Priced starting at $169, it offers an attractive package of an 11-inch 90Hz display, generous RAM and internal storage options, a sturdy metal build, and up-to-date software. In this full review, we will delve into the various aspects of the Redmi Pad SE to ascertain whether it lives up to Xiaomi’s claims and if it stands as a strong contender in the budget tablet arena. We will start by unboxing the device and then explore its design, display quality, hardware performance, software experience, multimedia capabilities, battery life, and overall value proposition. Additionally, we will compare it with other tablets in its price range to help you make an informed decision about whether the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE is the right tablet for your needs.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 28-09-2023
Bron: Igeekphone

From the specification point of view, this Redmi Pad SE continues the excellent workmanship of the previous generation. At a price of 1,000 yuan, it has 11 inches + stereo four speakers for audio and video. It is difficult to find a better tablet at the same price. With a relatively limited budget, we naturally cannot expect its performance to be as good as that of flagship products to meet the needs of daily use. In addition, it has a very high-quality metal body design with no breakpoints on the back. There is really no better product in its category. Good product too. We actually measured the performance of “Genshin Impact” with the default image quality + 60 FPS. It can reach the level of 33.3 FPS, and the temperature is only 40°C. With such results, the performance of games such as “QQ Speed” and “Honor of Kings” that do not require high screen load will be smoother than the hardware killer “Genshin Impact”.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 23-09-2023
Bron: Nextpit EN

The Redmi tablet is an absolute entry-level tablet on the spec sheet, which is also underlined by the price tag. However, the Android 13 tablet turns out to be a real premium device in the hand and in daily use on the couch at home. The processor in the device is more mid-range, especially when it comes to graphics. This implies that demanding games like PUBG or Fortnite might not run optimally on the Redmi tablet. However, for all other regular activities and daily tasks, there are no limitations. The 6 nm SoC is not only compact but also quite contemporary. Nevertheless, there is no LTE feature. Neither is stylus nor keyboard support. Too bad, Xiaomi, because you almost convinced us with the audio jack and the microSD card support and got the full score. Thus, there are still deductions in the B score in the last meters, and it is only enough for 4.5 stars—but from the heart!
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 28-08-2023
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: WinFuture

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 29-09-2023
Bron: Tablet Blog

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 20-09-2023
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Nextpit Germany

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 28-08-2023
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Computerhoy

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-09-2023
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Zona Movilidad

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 19-09-2023
Beoordeling: Totale score: 73%
Bron: Xataka

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-09-2023
Beoordeling: Totale score: 81% prestatie: 60% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 88% afwerking: 88%
Bron: Canaltech

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 14-09-2023
Bron: Mister Gadget

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 08-11-2023
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Multiplayer IT

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 19-09-2023
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75%
Bron: Evo smart

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 06-09-2023
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60% prijs: 60% prestatie: 60% beeldscherm: 60% mobiliteit: 70%
Bron: Nextpit France

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 31-08-2023
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Techno Senior

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 02-10-2023
Bron: Tabletowo

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 30-09-2023
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75%
Bron: Android.com.pl

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 22-09-2023
Beoordeling: Totale score: 73% prestatie: 60% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 90%
Bron: GSM Online

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 22-09-2023
Bron: Unite4buy

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 10-09-2023
Bron: DGL.ru

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 03-11-2023
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: FPT shop

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 18-11-2023
Bron: Cell Phones

Hands-On, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 24-10-2023
Bron: FPT shop

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 11-10-2023
Bron: FPT shop

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 06-10-2023
Bron: The Gioididong

Hands-On, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 27-09-2023
Commentaar
Qualcomm Adreno 610:
Geïntegreerde (in de Snapdragon 665) grafische kaart gebaseerd op de Adreno 600-architectuur. De prestaties van de GPU liggen tussen die van de Adreno 510 en 512/612 en dus in de lagere mid-range. Biedt ondersteuning voor Direct X11_1, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2.
Alleen oudere games kunnen vloeiend draaien met deze grafische chips (als ze niet veeleisend zijn). Gedeeld geheugen grafische cores in deze categorie hebben het voordeel van minder warmte-ontwikkeling en langere batterijlooptijd. Voor kantoor, internet, beeldcorrectie- en videomonteringswerk zijn deze grafische chips nog steeds bruikbaar zonder enige beperkingen.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
SD 680:
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.
11.00": Dit is een typisch schermformaat voor tablets en kleine convertibles.
Grote schermformaten laten hogere resoluties toe. Details zoals letters zijn groter. Anderzijds is het energieverbruik lager bij kleine schermdiagonalen en de toestellen zijn kleiner, lichter en goedkoper.
>>Om de fijnheid van het scherm te vinden, kijk in onze DPI-lijst.
79.8%: Dit cijfer is niet echt overtuigend. Het moet in acht worden genomen dat er bijna geen laptops zijn die een score onder de 60% hebben. Dit notebook is beneden gemiddeld beoordeeld, en is niet aanbevolen te kopen.
>> De verdere informatie kan worden gevonden in onze hulp voor de aankoop van laptops.