Razer Blade 14 (2014)
Laptopspecificaties

Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 6 score (van 13 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Razer Blade 14 (2014)
Bron: Computer Shopper
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThough it's nice to see that Razer was listening to criticism of last year's Razer Blade for not having full HD resolution, the 3,200x1,800 display of this year's update feels like overcompensating, since it's hard to get playable frame rates at such sky-high resolution.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 29-12-2014
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Comp Reviews
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe 2013 version of the Razer Blade was an amazingly small yet powerful gaming laptop that had an extremely flawed display. Razer has addressed that problem with the 2014 version by including a great ultra high resolution display that also features a touchscreen. This finally makes the system worth its premium price but it does introduce a new problem of reduced battery life which is disappointing.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 29-08-2014
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Gadgetguy
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionIt’s expensive though, that much we have to acknowledge, especially at $3499, but you are paying for something that is offering some of the best performance this side of the portable PC gaming world, and that’s something. If you’ve checked out the competition for gaming computers and aren’t impressed, it’s time to see what Razer has to offer, because while it’s not cheap, the Razer Blade 14 is very, very impressive.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 20-08-2014
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90% prijs: 80% prestatie: 90% functionaliteiten: 100% afwerking: 100%
Bron: Laptop Mag
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionAfter three iterations, Razer continues to lead the charge on what a true portable gaming notebook should be. The $2,399 Blade 14 is a near-perfect merging of power and portability, delivering the sleek, sexy chassis I've come to know and love, with enough oomph to knock competitors on their arses. And the 3200 x 1800 display is a sight to behold.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 10-08-2014
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: PC Mag
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Razer Blade (2014) is disappointing, mostly because we had such high hopes. Razer still manages to outfit the laptop with some amazing capabilities, but it feels like the company reached too far, too soon, stepping up the resolution at the expense of gameplay, and opting for powerful hardware that chews through battery life and runs alarmingly hot. Past models of the Blade left us eagerly anticipating the point when Razer could finally bring everything together into an ultraportable gaming system that required no compromises, but between the heat, the short battery life, the display issues, and the higher price, we're still left waiting. The previous model, the Editors' Choice Razer Blade (2013), is still available through Razer and other retailers, so it remains our top pick for ultraportable gaming, thanks to better battery life and a more affordable price.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 28-07-2014
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: CNet France
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 10-06-2014
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Ixbt
 RU→NL Archive.org version
 RU→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 16-07-2015
Bron: Notebook-Center.ru
 RU→NL Archive.org version
 RU→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 04-11-2014
Bron: 3DNews.ru
 RU→NL Archive.org version
 RU→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 18-08-2014
Bron: Ferra.ru
 RU→NL Archive.org version
 RU→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 29-07-2014
Bron: Ferra.ru
 RU→NL Archive.org version
 RU→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 29-07-2014
Bron: Hi-Tech Mail
 RU→NL Archive.org version
 RU→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 28-07-2014
Bron: Zoom
 RU→NL Archive.org version
 RU→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 22-07-2014
Commentaar
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M:
High-end grafische kaart van de GeForce GTX 800M-serie.
Deze grafische kaarten zouden alle huidige spellen moeten kunnen draaien, maar de meeste spellen zullen alleen met gemiddelde of lage detail instellingen en lage resoluties goed werken. Oudere of minder veeleisende spellen kunnen nog wel met goede grafische instellingen gespeeld worden.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
4702HQ: Haswell quad-core processor met een kloksnelheid van 2.2 GHz, die dankzij Turbo Boost kan oplopen tot 3.2 GHz. Beschikt over een geïntegreerde HD Graphics 4600 GPU en dual-channel DDR3 memory controller.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.



