Nokia 3
Laptopspecificaties

Secundaire Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, contrast AF, video's @720p/30FPS
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 38 score (van 59 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Nokia 3
Welkom terug! Nokia betreedt met de Nokia 3 opnieuw de ring van smartphonefabrikanten. Lees hier of het apparaat zich verschuilt achter de bekende naam, of dat het deze naam tot nieuwe hoogtes kan brengen.
Bron: Techradar
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionIt may look like one of the best cheap phones on the market but the Nokia 3 is style over substance, struggling with long load times and poor battery life.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 14-08-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Tech Advisor
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionWe had high hopes for the Nokia 3, but the final phone is a bit of a disappointment. We can't deny that it looks absolutely fantastic for the price, and we're fans of Nokia's decision to stick to stock Android, but it's just cut too many corners on the internal specs to make the 3 stand out amid a fiercely competitive budget smartphone market.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 10-08-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: It Pro
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionAt £130, there isn't much direct competition, aside from the 2016 Motorola Moto G4, which you can still buy for £140. But, as long as you don't mind buying a generation-old phone, the Moto is the better choice. It has a bigger, higher-resolution screen, faster performance, a better camera and superior battery life.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 07-08-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Trusted Reviews
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionIt’s perfectly functional as a backup phone – decent battery life means it can happily be thrown into a bag and forgotten about during a festival or camping holiday – but there are better choices out there for anything more. The Moto G5 isn’t much more expensive and offers a 1080p screen, much snappier Snapdragon CPU, a camera that’s surprisingly good and a fingerprint scanner. There’s also the Wileyfox Swift 2 and a good selection of carrier-locked options from Vodafone.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 01-08-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60% prijs: 60% prestatie: 50% beeldscherm: 60% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 70%
Bron: NDTV Gadgets
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Nokia 3 is now available in India priced at Rs. 9,499. It is a good-looking smartphone, and also supports 4G with VoLTE. One big positive point is that the company has promised future Android updates. Overall performance and camera results aren't its biggest highlights. We also missed a fingerprint scanner, which really should be a standard feature now.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 28-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60% prijs: 70% prestatie: 60% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Pocket Lint
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Nokia 3 feels like the wrong first step for a new Nokia. We accept that there's a great demand for phones that are affordable, but with the likes of Motorola offering some great devices around this price or a fraction higher, it's hard to see how the Nokia 3 competitively fits into the equation.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 26-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Phone Arena
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionAt the end of the day, the Nokia 3 is a well-designed phone that catches the eye, but this impression turns out to be only superficial. Using the phone reveals many shortcomings: the stuttery, underpowered performance, the camera that is completely inept in video and one terribly imbalanced display. If you are on the hunt for that perfect cheap phone… well, who knows if it even exists, but we know that it most likely is not the Nokia 3.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 24-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Stuff TV
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionIf your budget will stretch further, there are superior handsets such as the Motorola Moto G5 and Lenovo P2. If it won’t? Vodafone’s Smart N8 only costs £85, and that manages to pack in a fingerprint sensor.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 21-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Techradar
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Nokia 3 has the looks of one of the best cheap phones on the market but under scrutiny it struggles with long load times and poor battery life. If you value style over substance as well as saving a quick buck, it may be right for you.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Zdnet.com
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionBuying on a budget is always a compromise, but there's a lot to like about the Nokia 3. It punches above its weight in the looks department and the inclusion of NFC is a plus. Unskinned Android with the promise of regular updates will also go down well with many potential buyers, but the screen resolution is disappointing.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 19-07-2017
Bron: CNet
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Nokia 3 sacrifices too much processing power to achieve its low price. You’re better off spending a bit more on the Motorola Moto G5.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 14-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 64% prestatie: 40% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Tech Advisor
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionWe’re strangely excited about the Nokia 3 considering the fact that it’s budget and there’s nothing particularly innovative about it. It’s just a really good all-rounder with such a great price tag that it’s hard not to recommend to anyone not wanting to spend loads to get the best smartphone tech available. We think this is going to a hugely popular new handset and we wouldn’t be surprised if it knocks the Moto G out of the top spot in our budget smartphone chart.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 12-07-2017
Bron: Fone Arena
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionOn the whole, Nokia 3 seems to be a decent start for the company’s Android smartphone journey. This budget Nokia phone from HMD ticks most of the factors in good terms, except for a few shortcomings. Having said that, at this price point, you can get other smartphones with Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets. If you spend more and wait for some time, you can get the Nokia 6 that will be available soon from Amazon India with much better specifications.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 04-07-2017
Bron: GSM Arena
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Nokia 3 has every prospect to sell equally well. But even if it flops, the little budget Nokia shouldn't really be more than a tiny snag on the tracks of the massive hype train HMD is currently piloting. All eyes are now fixed on the company's eagerly-anticipated flagship offer. It could really make or break the reinvented Nokia brand, so be sure to keep close taps on those developments.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 30-06-2017
Bron: India Today
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Nokia 3 is not a perfect smartphone. Its performance could have been better. The cameras are average and the battery life, while decent, is not mind-blowing. The Nokia 3 is not for enthusiasts or those who push their devices.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 28-06-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75%
Bron: Phone World
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionNokia 3 is one of the most awaited device of 2017 but unfortunately Nokia 3 has not surprised me with it’s any feature. We have explained its every feature in Nokia 3 Review – 2017. The price is very affordable by which it can hit the users otherwise it has very normal specifications. I have found its camera results are very weak and the battery should be bigger. We were expecting a lot more from Nokia because it is Nokia not any other company. Body and shape wise, Nokia 3 is very solid and strong furthermore it has very light weight.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 16-06-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 68% prijs: 70% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 60% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Techradar
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Nokia 3 looks to be a strong budget offering and its stylish design and extremely low price tag could shake up the market.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 28-04-2017
Bron: Tech Advisor
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionWe’re strangely excited about the Nokia 3 considering the fact that it’s budget and there’s nothing particularly innovative about it. It’s just a really good all-rounder with such a great price tag that it’s hard not to recommend to anyone not wanting to spend loads to get the best smartphone tech available. We think this is going to a hugely popular new handset and we wouldn’t be surprised if it knocks the Moto G out of the top spot in our budget smartphone chart.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-03-2017
Bron: Trusted Reviews
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionBudget phones are getting better all the time, and the Nokia 3 certainly seems like it’s worthy of battling the Moto G series when it comes to supremacy.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 26-02-2017
Bron: Billiger-telefonieren.de
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 07-11-2017
Bron: Connect - 10/17

Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 01-10-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 68% functionaliteiten: 55% mobiliteit: 71% ergonomie: 73%
Bron: Chip.de
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 05-09-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 66% prestatie: 78% functionaliteiten: 49% beeldscherm: 78% mobiliteit: 68%
Bron: Android Pit
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 09-08-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Tech Stage
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 23-07-2017
Bron: Curved
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 18-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 67% prestatie: 54% beeldscherm: 56% mobiliteit: 80%
Bron: Android TV
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 28-06-2017
Bron: Computerhoy
 ES→NL Archive.org version
 ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 20-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 65% prijs: 70% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 60% afwerking: 60%
Bron: Movil Zona
 ES→NL Archive.org version
 ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 20-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% prijs: 70% prestatie: 60% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 70%
Bron: El Androide Libre
 ES→NL Archive.org version
 ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 19-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 69%
Bron: Media Trends
 ES→NL Archive.org version
 ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 14-07-2017
Bron: El Androide Libre
 ES→NL Archive.org version
 ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 27-02-2017
Bron: Mais Tecnologia
 PT→NL Archive.org version
 PT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 12-08-2017
Bron: Ridble
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 18-08-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: AndroidPit.it
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 08-08-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: HDblog.it
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 25-06-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Androidiani
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 22-06-2017
Bron: AndroidWorld.it
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 22-06-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 50% prijs: 70% functionaliteiten: 75% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 75% ergonomie: 85%
Bron: Andrea Galeazzi
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 18-06-2017
Bron: Smartphone e tablet android
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 17-04-2017
Beoordeling: prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Top for Phone
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 06-08-2017
Bron: CNet France
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 02-08-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: AndroidPit.fr
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 27-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Android.com.pl
 PL→NL Archive.org version
 PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 22-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 61% prestatie: 40% beeldscherm: 60% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Tabletowo
 PL→NL Archive.org version
 PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 12-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 50% prestatie: 20% beeldscherm: 75% mobiliteit: 60% afwerking: 85%
Bron: Helpix
 RU→NL Archive.org version
 RU→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 25-09-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Hi-Tech Mail
 RU→NL Archive.org version
 RU→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 28-06-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 44% prestatie: 30% beeldscherm: 40% mobiliteit: 50% afwerking: 60%
Bron: Product Test
 RU→NL Archive.org version
 RU→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 28-02-2017
Bron: Svet Androida
 CZ→NL Archive.org version
 CZ→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 24-06-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Zing
 VN→NL Archive.org version
 VN→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 19-09-2017
Bron: XT Mobile
 VN→NL Archive.org version
 VN→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 09-08-2017
Bron: Sohoa VN Express
 VN→NL Archive.org version
 VN→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 05-08-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 59% prijs: 60% beeldscherm: 50% mobiliteit: 50% afwerking: 80%
Bron: The Gioididong
 VN→NL Archive.org version
 VN→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 24-06-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 68%
Bron: The Gioididong
 VN→NL Archive.org version
 VN→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 19-06-2017
Bron: The Gioididong
 VN→NL Archive.org version
 VN→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 27-02-2017
Bron: Tek.no
 NO→NL Archive.org version
 NO→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 05-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 65%
Bron: Mobil.se
 SV→NL Archive.org version
 SV→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 01-08-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 58%
Bron: Android Portal
 SK→NL Archive.org version
 SK→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 22-08-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% beeldscherm: 68% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 75%
Bron: Playtech.ro
 →NL Archive.org version
 →NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 31-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 87%
Bron: Puhelinvertailu
 →NL Archive.org version
 →NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 21-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Commentaar
ARM Mali-T720:
Deze grafische kaarten voor notebooks zijn niet bruikbaar voor games. Als ze al games kunnen draaien, dan doen ze dat met grafische afwijkingen en heel lage framesnelheid. Voor gamers zijn deze chips ongeschikt! Kantoor en internet taken zijn, daarentegen, geen probleem voor deze GPUs.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
MT6737:
ARM-gebaseerd quad-core-SoC (4x Cortex-A53) met 64-bit-ondersteuning en een kloksnelheid tot 1.3 GHz.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.

