Lenovo Moto Z
Laptopspecificaties

Secundaire Camera: 5 MPix (fix focus f/2.2, 1080p video @ 30 fps)
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 57 score (van 94 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Lenovo Moto Z
Moto-mania. Lenovo's nieuwe Moto Z topmodel bevat niet alleen de nieuwste technologieën, maar probeert ook populariteit te verkrijgen met modulaire uitbreidingsmogelijkheden. Werkt het concept ook in de praktijk of zijn er zelfs grote nadelen aan verbonden?
Bron: Computer Totaal
Archive.org versionLenovo gaat met de Moto Z-serie een modulair avontuur aan. En dat gaat niet meteen van een leien dakje, want de modules voegen weinig toe of zijn zo prijzig dat een commercieel succes lijkt uitgesloten. We hopen daarom dat er de aankomende maanden accessoires uitkomen die beter te betalen zijn en ook echt nut hebben.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Anderstalige testrapporten
Bron: Techradar
EN→NL Archive.org versionMoto Z is an incredibly thin Android phone, yet it's still able to boast the specs of its rival and add modular accessories to the mix. This is a stepping stone to a fully modular phone. We only wish we could exchange its big camera bump for the sorely missing 3.5mm headphone jack.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 19-09-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Techradar
EN→NL Archive.org versionMoto Z is an incredibly thin Android phone, yet it's still able to boast the specs of its rival and add modular accessories to the mix. This is a stepping stone to a fully modular phone. We only wish we could exchange its big camera bump for the sorely missing 3.5mm headphone jack.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 31-07-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Leophire
EN→NL Archive.org versionMotorola didn’t dial back the performance of the Moto Z to set new thinness records or to make way for these magnetized accessories. Its specs are the same as its top competitors, including the ZTE Axon 7, HTC 10, LG G5, and Samsung Galaxy S7 and S7 Edge in the US. It has the same processor, RAM and internal storage and even a microSD card slot (no modding needed). The 13MP camera on back and real-flash-included 5MP camera in front are solid, though you can’t miss that extreme camera bump in back. Somehow, even with that bump, it’s still not the best in the world, just really good for everything but low light.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 13-05-2017
Bron: Review Zat
EN→NL Archive.org versionيعتبر موبايل لينوفو موتو زي اختيار مناسب للمهتمين بشراء موبايل بتصميم نحيف و اداء قوي و إضافات ذكية تجعله هاتف فريد من نوعه، إكسسوار سماعات JBL يعطيك تجربة صوتية مميزة مع درجة صوت عالية و نقية لن تجدها في الموبايلات الاخرى التي تتوفر في نفس الفئة السعرية، و ذلك بالإضافة لباقي اكسسوارات Moto Mods الذكية إكسسوار Insta Share بروجيكتور، و إكسسوار بطارية إضافية، و إكسسوار Hasselblad True Zoom الذي يعتبر كاميرا اضافية للموبايل مزودة بـOptical Zoom حتى 10X.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 21-02-2017
Bron: Phone World
EN→NL Archive.org versionLenovo moto z is having latest features such as moto-moods functions, which is totally new thing in technology world. The camera results are very impressive and with 4GB RAM it is providing us a fast and better experience. The device can easily compete with its competitors and we have tested the device in every section and it has performed very well.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 17-02-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 80% prestatie: 80% mobiliteit: 60% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Soycincau
EN→NL Archive.org versionI’d be lying if I said I didn’t buy into Moto’s idea of a “modular” smartphone. It was just so simple and elegant that you can’t help but think: “Why didn’t LG think of this?” But I made those assumptions based on what I saw at the launch.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 09-02-2017
Bron: Lowyat.net
EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Moto Z is a very good flagship device, this much is true. The many Moto Mods add functionalities to the device other smartphones simply do not offer, and its capable camera – although not perfect – and polished software experience make it a very pleasant smartphone to use.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 23-12-2016
Bron: Forbes
EN→NL Archive.org versionEverything else about the Moto Z is really solid. Its camera (without the add-on) is a 13-megapixel shooter with f/1.8 aperture. It focuses very fast (but not as fast as the S7 Edge) and has a manual mode, which will come in handy because in auto mode the camera's white balance tend to be too cool. In low light, the camera is a disappointment. It doesn't take in nearly as much light as the HTC 10, S7 Edge or LG V20, and images have a lot of noise.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 19-12-2016
Bron: Androidcommunity.com
EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Moto Z flagship is another story, as it has the horsepower, the style, and the pricing to hang with the big boys on the block. Throw in the Moto Mods and you’ve got a competitive phone that also has access to a still-developing spectrum of fun and useful accessories, gear that Lenovo has pledged will remain compatible with the next generation Moto Z as well. If you plan on keeping your phone for the next few years, and are intrigued by the promise of Moto Mods, the Z is definitely worth a hard look. Even if the Mods aren’t your thing, this incredibly thin phone might be the right fit for your ultra-mobile lifestyle.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 15-12-2016
Bron: Hardware Zone
EN→NL Archive.org versionIf you're just going for a Style Shell and the battery pack, the Moto Z would actually make an ideal purchase. Otherwise, the entire package would be a huge blow to the bank account, and getting just one other module defeats the purpose of having a modular, hot-swappable phone.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 19-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 75% prestatie: 80% afwerking: 85%
Bron: Tech Girl
EN→NL Archive.org versionDon’t let that deter you from the Moto Z itself. The phone is sleek and fast. It’s safe to say that Motorola (Moto) is back in epic style and I couldn’t be happier. If I was to score it I’d give it a solid 9 out of 10 because #bringbackauxport.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 09-11-2016
Bron: Gear Open
EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Moto Z had the potential to be a great flagship phone but ultimately it’s let down by truly dire battery life.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 03-11-2016
Bron: Trusted Reviews
EN→NL Archive.org versionIn fact, I'd rather have had a thicker phone with a better battery. The lack of a headphone jack is another annoyance, but one that pales in comparison to the battery. Did I mention the terrible battery?
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 03-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60% prijs: 70% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 40% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Neowin
EN→NL Archive.org versionLet's be clear - the Moto Z is a pretty good device - but it does have some caveats. While the handset is snappy and the Android experience is close to stock, the camera and battery are two areas where the Moto Z fails to impress. While the camera software can always be tweaked in a later update, the battery will always remain the same, and 2600 mAh is simply not enough. While those that are on Verizon will have the option of going with the beefier Moto Z Force with a larger battery, there is no GSM equivalent of that handset. Instead, Lenovo's only option for GSM users is the Moto Z Play, that offers a larger battery, but at the expense of 1GB RAM, 32GB onboard storage, and a mid-tier CPU/GPU.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 29-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Mobile Choice
EN→NL Archive.org versionTo be fair, there aren't really many negatives I can point out about this phone and its winning the Mobile Choice Consumer Award 2016 for Most Innovative Device proves it is far ahead in the pack than its peers. Pure Android is another plus as are the fast charge capabilities.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 27-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100% prestatie: 100% mobiliteit: 90%
Bron: Fone Arena
EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Moto Z is quite simply, one of the best devices that the company has made. Not only is it a gorgeous phone in it’s own way, it also paves the path for a new brand of modular phones and keeps the legacy of Motorola alive at Lenovo.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 19-10-2016
Bron: NDTV Gadgets
EN→NL Archive.org versionMotorola's take on a modular smartphone is definitely a lot stronger than any other we've seen before. Even without considering the mods, the new Moto Z is a powerful, stylish phone with a lot to offer. Almost everything about it looks good and works well. This is a great phone for those who want style and power, but aren't necessarily going to run heavy apps all the time. The ability to use mods is of course the biggest draw, so be sure to read our detailed reviews of the Hasselblad True Zoom camera, JBL Soundboost speaker, and Moto Insta-share projector.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 17-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 70% prestatie: 90% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Techaeris
EN→NL Archive.org versionIf you’re looking for a smartphone that’s versatile, has decent battery life, and has options to “mod” your phone, the Moto Z and Moto Z Play are definitely a pair of smartphones which shine in a field that has become relatively stagnant over the past couple years. I REALLY hope that the Moto Mods system takes off and sticks around for a few years because I can really see the potential for such a system.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 15-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 96% prijs: 90% prestatie: 100% beeldscherm: 100% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 95%
Bron: Recombu
EN→NL Archive.org versionAt £499, the Moto Z is obviously priced like a flagship, but justifies the cost well. It offers a beautiful design and a stunning screen, a unique feature set thanks to its Moto Mods compatibility, excellent battery life with the benefit of fast charging, smart UI elements and a great (although not class-leading) pair of cameras.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 08-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Gear Diary
EN→NL Archive.org versionThese are the four main Moto Mods available now. What I love about each of them is how easy they are to swap in and out to bring the Mod’s particular properties to your Moto Z phone. I like how they charge when they are attached to a charging phone, and I like how they have their own batteries so they don’t drain your phone any faster than absolutely necessary when in use.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 04-10-2016
Bron: Mobile Syrup
EN→NL Archive.org versionCamera wise, however, the Z leaves a bit to be desired as I found the Moto Z’s focus to be too slow for how I typically use a smartphone’s camera. Aesthetically, the Moto Z looks spectacular and features a unique look that helps it stand out from other smartphones on the market, though I still prefer the Note 7’s mix of smooth lines and angles to the Moto Z’s more blocky shape.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 03-10-2016
Bron: Phandroid
EN→NL Archive.org versionWith the cost of this device priced just $100 more than that of the Moto Z Droid, it’s hard to not recommend the Moto Z Force Droid over its little brother. The better camera, bigger battery, and ShatterShield display give this device everything you need for a great smartphone experience.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 28-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 98%
Bron: Android Pit
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 21-04-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: c't - 5/2017

Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-03-2017
Bron: Cyberbloc
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 29-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Android Mag
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 27-01-2017
Beoordeling: prestatie: 100% functionaliteiten: 100% beeldscherm: 100% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 100%
Bron: Connect - 2/2017

Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 15-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 87%
Bron: Chip.de
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 13-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 87% prijs: 85% prestatie: 85%
Bron: Futurezone.at
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 19-12-2016
Bron: Android Pit
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 08-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Android Mag
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 05-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100%
Bron: PC Welt
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 04-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 95% prestatie: 96% functionaliteiten: 96% beeldscherm: 92% mobiliteit: 98%
Bron: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 1/2017

Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-11-2016
Bron: Go2 Mobile
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 27-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100% prijs: 80% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 100% afwerking: 100%
Bron: Computerbild - Heft 22/2016

Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 15-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 86%
Bron: c't - Heft 22/2016

Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 15-10-2016
Bron: Netzwelt
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 14-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82% functionaliteiten: 90% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Golem
DE→NL Archive.org versionVergelijking, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 10-10-2016
Bron: Tech Stage
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 10-10-2016
Bron: Computerbase
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 29-09-2016
Bron: Android Pit
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 24-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Notebookinfo
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 15-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 94% prestatie: 100% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 90% afwerking: 95% ergonomie: 90% emissies: 95%
Bron: Inside Handy
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 14-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Android Pit
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 13-09-2016
Bron: Curved
DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 02-09-2016
Bron: SFT - Heft 10/2016

Enkel testrapport, , Lengte onbekend, Datum: 01-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 99%
Bron: Andro Asia
ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 16-10-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 76% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 65%
Bron: Tuexperto
ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 18-04-2017
Bron: Movil Zona
ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 30-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prijs: 70% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Zona Movilidad
ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 07-01-2017
Bron: Computerhoy
ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 10-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 86% prijs: 70% functionaliteiten: 90% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 90%
Bron: El Confidencial
ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 05-11-2016
Bron: Xataka
ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 25-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 87% prestatie: 90% beeldscherm: 93% mobiliteit: 75% afwerking: 95%
Bron: Hipertextual
ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 25-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Xataka
ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 16-10-2016
Bron: Canaltech
PT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 01-10-2016
Bron: Geek 4 You
IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 01-02-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 84%
Bron: Key for web
IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 16-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prestatie: 80% functionaliteiten: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 80%
Bron: Pianeta Cellulare
IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 08-12-2016
Bron: AndroidPit.it
IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 23-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Batista70Phone
IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 10-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82% prijs: 60% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 40% ergonomie: 90%
Bron: Pianeta Cellulare
IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 02-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82% prijs: 65% functionaliteiten: 75% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 100% afwerking: 85%
Bron: Toms Hardware Italia
IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 21-10-2016
Bron: Megapk
IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 13-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% functionaliteiten: 85% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 65%
Bron: AndroidWorld.it
IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 10-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83% prijs: 65% functionaliteiten: 85% beeldscherm: 85% mobiliteit: 65% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: Leonardo.it Tech
IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 05-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 89% prijs: 75% functionaliteiten: 100% beeldscherm: 92% mobiliteit: 60% ergonomie: 82%
Bron: HDblog.it
IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 29-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82%
Bron: Le monde numerique
FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 08-03-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100%
Bron: Hitek
FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 29-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78% prijs: 80% prestatie: 90% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 70%
Bron: Clubic
FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 28-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 90% ergonomie: 80%
Bron: AndroidPit.fr
FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 11-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Frandroid
FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 30-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% prestatie: 90% beeldscherm: 100% mobiliteit: 80% afwerking: 90%
Bron: CNet France
FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 31-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: 90 Sekund
PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 26-05-2017
Bron: Teleguru
PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 03-04-2017
Bron: Tablety
PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 19-03-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83%
Bron: Android.com.pl
PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 16-02-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78% prestatie: 90% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 70%
Bron: Komputerswiat
PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 05-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 78% functionaliteiten: 76%
Bron: Tabletowo
PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 03-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 83% prestatie: 90% beeldscherm: 90% mobiliteit: 60% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Helpix
RU→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 30-04-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100%
Bron: Hitech Vesti
RU→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 08-02-2017
Bron: Hi-Tech Mail
RU→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 24-11-2016
Bron: CNews.cz
CZ→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 03-07-2017
Bron: Tinh Te
VN→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 18-01-2017
Bron: Sohoa VN Express
VN→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 12-12-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 79% prijs: 80% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Zing
VN→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 08-12-2016
Bron: Tek.no
NO→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 03-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Alt om Data
DA→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 09-08-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90% prijs: 70% prestatie: 80% beeldscherm: 80% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 90%
Bron: Mere Mobil.dk
DA→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 11-01-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 67%
Bron: Mobil.se
SV→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 03-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80% functionaliteiten: 80%
Bron: Computerblog.ro
→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 31-01-2017
Bron: Playtech.ro
→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 31-12-2016
Commentaar
Qualcomm Adreno 530:
Geïntegreerde grafische kaart in de Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 die geklokt is aan maximaal 624 MHz. In het begin van 2016 is het een high-end grafische kaart voor Android-gebaseerde smartphones en tablets die zelfs zeer veeleisende games zou moeten aankunnen.
De meeste niet-veeleisende huidige games kunnen vloeiend draaien. Wees voorbereid op verminderde grafische weergave door lage detailinstellingen en lage resoluties. Toch verschaffen deze kaarten voldoende prestatie voor kantoor taken en video bekijken (niet voor HD videos).
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
820 MSM8996:
High-end ARM-SoC met 4 CPU-cores (twee snelle 2.15 GHz cores in een cluster en twee zuinige 1.6 GHz cores)en een Adreno 530 GPU. Gefabriceerd in een 14-nm HPM-proces.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.