Kort testrapport Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 8 Tablet
Mini Me(diaPad). De 8 inch variant van de MediaPad M3 Lite blaast een nieuwe wind in het Android ecosysteem. Ondanks de middenklasse specificaties blijkt de M3 Lite een capabele tablet te zijn. Is dit het nieuwe hebbedingetje?
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Top 10 Testrapporten
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €120
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €300
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Windows-Tablets
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5-inch)
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5-inch)
» Best Geteste Notebook Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000Notebookcheck's Beste Notebook-Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300
| Networking | |
| iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 | |
| iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Helderheidsverdeling: 92 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 409.1 cd/m²
Contrast: 731:1 (Zwart: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
Gamma: 2.2
| Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 IPS, IPS, 8, 1920x1200 | Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 10-point Multitouch, IPS, 8, 1280x800 | Apple iPad Mini 4 Retina Display, IPS, 7.9, 2048x1536 | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch IPS, 8.4, 2560x1600 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 Super AMOLED, 9.7, 2048x1526 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 IPS, 7, 1280x800 | Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A IPS, 7.9, 2048x1536 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -16% | -89% | 86% | -112% | -29% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 27.2 (14, 13.2) | 35.2 (16.4, 18.8) -29% | 59 (16, 43) -117% | 4 (2, 2) 85% | 69 (45, 24) -154% | 31 (14, 17) -14% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 22.4 (12.4, 10) | 22.8 (11.6, 11.2) -2% | 36 (13, 23) -61% | 3.2 (2, 1.2) 86% | 38 (22, 16) -70% | 32 (15, 17) -43% | |
| PWM Frequency | 221.2 (100) | ||||||
| Screen | -21% | 13% | -0% | 34% | -11% | 11% | |
| Brightness middle | 409.1 | 419 2% | 411 0% | 460 12% | 452 10% | 358 -12% | 386 -6% |
| Brightness | 402 | 412 2% | 421 5% | 445 11% | 468 16% | 344 -14% | 364 -9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 91 -1% | 91 -1% | 90 -2% | 82 -11% | 92 0% | 88 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.56 | 0.39 30% | 0.58 -4% | 0.45 20% | 0.37 34% | 0.57 -2% | |
| Contrast | 731 | 1074 47% | 709 -3% | 1022 40% | 968 32% | 677 -7% | |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 4.1 | 8.5 -107% | 2.15 48% | 6.2 -51% | 1.8 56% | 5.3 -29% | 3.3 20% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 9.6 | 13.8 -44% | 10.5 -9% | 4 58% | 20.2 -110% | 7.1 26% | |
| Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 5.3 | 10.3 -94% | 2.72 49% | 6.5 -23% | 1.2 77% | 4.7 11% | 1.7 68% |
| Gamma | 2.2 109% | 2.6 92% | 2.29 105% | 2.33 103% | 2.11 114% | 2.44 98% | 2.42 99% |
| CCT | 7603 85% | 6216 105% | 7012 93% | 8056 81% | 6500 100% | 7222 90% | 6397 102% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 82.32 | ||||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.06 | ||||||
| Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen) | -19% /
-20% | 13% /
13% | -45% /
-18% | 60% /
47% | -62% /
-31% | -9% /
3% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Responstijd Scherm
| ↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 12.4 ms stijging |  |
| ↘ 10 ms daling | ||
| Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (26.1 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. | ||
| ↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs | ||
| 27.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 14 ms stijging |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms daling | ||
| Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (41.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen |  | ||
Ter vergelijking: 54 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 10402 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz waargenomen. | |||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 | |
| T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Apple iPad Mini 4 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| GFXBench 4.0 | |
| off screen Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work 2.0 battery life | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Computer Vision score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 | |
| Storage score | |
| Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Work performance score | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 | |
| Geekbench 4.1/4.2 | |
| Compute RenderScript Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score | |
| Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch | |
| Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 | |
| Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 | |
* ... kleiner is beter
| Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 16 GB eMMC Flash | Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 16 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 8 GB eMMC Flash | Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 25% | 104% | 106% | -23% | 53% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 14.6 | 34.15 134% | 23.52 61% | 58.56 301% | 18.4 26% | 20.61 41% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 87.7 | 51.06 -42% | 61.65 -30% | 76.39 -13% | 21.41 -76% | 39.62 -55% |
| Random Write 4KB | 7.64 | 11.51 51% | 31.35 310% | 13.13 72% | 9.55 25% | 6.91 -10% |
| Random Read 4KB | 35 | 21.55 -38% | 32.04 -8% | 45.82 31% | 21.95 -37% | 52.02 49% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 38.01 | 47.23 24% | 117.15 208% | 87.6 130% | 28.95 -24% | 116.62 207% |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 135.09 | 159.08 18% | 249.68 85% | 288.58 114% | 65.94 -51% | 252.3 87% |
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
| Uit / Standby |   2.3 / 2.92 Watt |
| Inactief |  4.02 / 6 / 6.64 Watt |
| Belasting |
7.34 / 9.6 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 435, Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 8 | Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x800, 8 | Apple iPad Mini 4 A8, PowerVR GX6450, 64 GB SSD, IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9 | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 SC7731, Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x800, 7 | Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9 | Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 435, Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 53% | 39% | 31% | 46% | 37% | 34% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.02 | 0.99 75% | 0.8 80% | 1.51 62% | 1.91 52% | 1.01 75% | 1.45 64% |
| Idle Average * | 6 | 2.74 54% | 3.6 40% | 3.64 39% | 3.59 40% | 2.71 55% | 4.44 26% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.64 | 2.83 57% | 3.9 41% | 3.68 45% | 4.06 39% | 2.75 59% | 4.61 31% |
| Load Average * | 7.34 | 4.51 39% | 6.1 17% | 6.95 5% | 4.29 42% | 7.28 1% | 6.21 15% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.6 | 5.69 41% | 8 17% | 9.11 5% | 4.31 55% | 10.02 -4% | 6.33 34% |
* ... kleiner is beter
| Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 435, Adreno 505, 18.6 Wh | Apple iPad Mini 4 A8, PowerVR GX6450, 19 Wh | Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, Mali-T720, Wh | Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch Kirin 950, Mali-T880 MP4, 19.5 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, Wh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 2016 SC7731, Mali-400 MP2, 14.8 Wh | Asus ZenPad 3 8.0 Z581KL-1A001A 650 MSM8956, Adreno 510, 18 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Batterijduur | -27% | 6% | -34% | 1% | -17% | -36% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1382 | 1488 8% | 2032 47% | 1110 -20% | 1903 38% | 1353 -2% | 1147 -17% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 877 | 539 -39% | 770 -12% | 546 -38% | 760 -13% | 619 -29% | 470 -46% |
| Load | 480 | 242 -50% | 393 -18% | 268 -44% | 375 -22% | 379 -21% | 263 -45% |
Pro
Contra
Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.
De MediaPad M3 Lite 8 is ontworpen als klein media-apparaat voor onderweg. Het kleurrijke, heldere beeldscherm en lange looptijden passen precies binnen dit plaatje. De prachtig ontworpen tablet is voornamelijk geschikt voor regelmatig multimediagebruik. Daarbij komen de hoogwaardige camera's goed van pas. Het apparaat wordt echter geplaagd door slechte gaming prestaties, weinig opslagruimte, onnodige bloatware en ondermaatse draadloze snelheden. Hoewel veeleisende gebruikers en gamers op zoek moeten gaan naar een alternatief, zal de tablet in goede smaak vallen bij kopers die lichter gebruik in gedachten hebben.
Uiteindelijk is de prijs beslissend. Afgezien van de bouwkwaliteit heeft de Wi-Fi versie niet veel meer te bieden dan de goedkopere concurrentie. Met een adviesprijs van $199 kan het apparaat net buiten het budget vallen van diegenen op zoek naar een tablet voor simpel YouTube gebruik. Er zijn betere alternatieven verkrijgbaar, zoals de Samsung Galaxy Tab A 7, die overigens $50 goedkoper begint. Voor $50 meer biedt de Asus Zenpad 3 8.0 meer rekenkracht en een scherper beeldscherm. Echter, de Huawei MediaPad serie is vaak in de aanbieding; ten tijde van het schrijven van dit testrapport is het apparaat verkrijgbaar bij Amazon voor $170. Dit maakt het apparaat veel aantrekkelijker.
Kopers op zoek naar een tablet voor licht gebruik zoals browsen en kijken van video's zullen tevreden zijn met de Huawei MediaPad M3 Lite 8. Echter, de hoogwaardige behuizing gaat ten koste van gaming prestaties. Alles bij elkaar is de MediaPad M3 Lite 8 een prachtige, maar wel enigszins dure budget tablet die het vooral van uitstraling moet hebben.
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 - 27-09-2017 v6
Sam Medley