Asus Zenbook UX21E-KX004V
Laptopspecificaties

Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 10 score (van 16 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Asus Zenbook UX21E-KX004V
Bron: PC Pro
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionFor all its faults, it isn’t hard to appreciate the Zenbook UX21’s talents. The mediocre display disappoints, but for a first effort this shows immense potential. Pretty, portable and powerful, it’s as fine an Ultrabook as you’ll find for the money.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 08-03-2012
Beoordeling: Totale score: 67% prijs: 83% prestatie: 67% functionaliteiten: 67% ergonomie: 67%
Bron: Reg Hardware
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Asus Zenbook UX21E is thinner, lighter and much more fun to use than I thought possible for an 11in notebook. Built to last and to impress, it manages to look amazing and cute at the same time. If the viewing angle on the display had been a few degrees wider, I would have rated the computer 90 per cent: I liked it that much. Asus also deserves kudos for including a tough slipcase, a USB-to-Ethernet adapter and a mini VGA-to-VGA adapter in the box, rather than charging for these as optional extras.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 09-02-2012
Beoordeling: Totale score: 85%
Bron: Computer Active
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Asus Zenbook would be a great laptop for use while travelling due to its good battery life and low weight, but its poorly designed touchpad and keyboard make it frustrating to use. It's not a bad laptop, but better buys are available.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 01-02-2012
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Digital Versus
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe UX21E is slightly disappointing. While the MacBook Air 11.6-inch is a bit more expensive, it also has a longer battery life, is more powerful and has a better quality screen, webcam, keyboard and audio section. While the UX31E – 13-3-inch version – is almost on a par with the same-size Air, the same can't be said for the UX21E.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 23-12-2011
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Fudzilla
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionFrankly, we all laughed when we heard Intel’s price targets for ultrabooks. In theory ultrabooks are simply MacBook Air clones manufactured by Intel partners that are not as experienced with ultrathin and light machines as Apple. Well, the UX21E is quite a good machine.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 30-11-2011
Bron: Fudzilla
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionFrankly, we all laughed when we heard Intel’s price targets for ultrabooks. In theory ultrabooks are simply MacBook Air clones manufactured by Intel partners that are not as experienced with ultrathin and light machines as Apple. Well, the UX21E is quite a good machine. It comes with a 128GB SSD drive, it costs €200 more than the flagship 64GB iPad, but it is still a good 150 euro cheaper than a comparable MacBook Air with the same Core i5, 4GB of RAM and 128GB SSD.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 30-11-2011
Bron: Techradar
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionAs a piece of modern laptop engineering, the Asus Zenbook UX21 is sublime. Only Apple has previously been able to make something this sleek, light, powerful and desirable, and for those who want to stick with Windows, this moment could not have come soon enough.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 17-11-2011
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Gadgetmix
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionIt wakes from sleep in two seconds and cold-boots in 21, excellent. It even auto-saves documents when battery life falls to 5%. Thrashing the UX21 delivers shutdown after 2hrs 24 mins, buzt sensible usage gives over five hours of battery life. The UX21 costs $1199.99. Its big brother, the 13″ Zenbook UX31, features an i7 processor, but performancewise there’s nothing in it.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 31-10-2011
Bron: Chip.de
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 22-02-2012
Beoordeling: Totale score: 64% prijs: 42% prestatie: 75% functionaliteiten: 56% beeldscherm: 93% mobiliteit: 53% ergonomie: 69%
Bron: Onlinekosten.de
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 29-01-2012
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82% prestatie: 87% functionaliteiten: 67% beeldscherm: 87% mobiliteit: 70% afwerking: 100% ergonomie: 70%
Bron: Notebookjournal
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 04-11-2011
Beoordeling: prestatie: 90% functionaliteiten: 30% beeldscherm: 70% mobiliteit: 50% afwerking: 90% ergonomie: 50%
Bron: Ocaholic.ch
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 04-11-2011
Beoordeling: Totale score: 50%
Bron: 01Net
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 18-11-2011
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Sohoa VN Express
 VN→NL Archive.org version
 VN→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 15-11-2011
Bron: Komputer for alle
 DA→NL Archive.org version
 DA→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 19-01-2012
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Datormagazin
 SV→NL Archive.org version
 SV→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 25-01-2012
Commentaar
Intel HD Graphics 3000: Aankomende (1ste kwartaal 2011) geïntegreerde grafische kaart van de Intel Sandy Bridge processoren (Core ix-2xxx). De 3000 / 200 is de snellere, intern GT2 genaamde, versie met 12 Execution Units (EU's).
Alleen oudere games kunnen vloeiend draaien met deze grafische chips (als ze niet veeleisend zijn). Gedeeld geheugen grafische cores in deze categorie hebben het voordeel van minder warmte-ontwikkeling en langere batterijlooptijd. Voor kantoor, internet, beeldcorrectie- en videomonteringswerk zijn deze grafische chips nog steeds bruikbaar zonder enige beperkingen.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
2467M: Energiebesparende ULV-processor met kloksnelheid van 1.6-2.3 GHz dankzij Turbo Boost. Biedt een geïntegreerde HD 3000 op een lage 350/1150 MHz en DDR3-1333 geheugencontroller.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.


