Lenovo Moto G4
Laptopspecificaties

Secundaire Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2
Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 17 score (van 27 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Lenovo Moto G4
Little brother. We liked the Moto G4 Plus, and now we can review the slightly slimmed-down Moto G4. What are the differences?
Bron: Techradar
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Moto G4 is an impressive improvement upon older generations of Motorola's most popular handset and it may well be the best phone you can buy on a budget.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 29-06-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: Digital Trends
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Moto G4 Play is hard to recommend when just $50 more can get you a much more powerful devices with better specs overall. You won’t have to worry about the device handling strenuous tasks if you cough up a little extra dough for devices like the Moto G4 and Plus, the Huawei Honor 5X, Alcatel’s OneTouch Idol 3, or ZTE’s ZMax Pro.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 15-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 40%
Bron: Forbes
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionIt seems that the pros outweigh the cons when it comes to the Moto G4 and G4 Plus. If you are looking to own an Android device, then I would strongly consider getting either the Moto G4 or G4 Plus — especially if you are on a budget. Personally, I would take the G4 Plus over the G4 because of its superior camera and memory hardware along with the fingerprint sensor.
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 12-09-2016
Bron: Best Products
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe Moto G Plus on the other hand, costs $250 for a phone with 2GB of RAM and 16GB of storage. A budget of $300, on the other hand, will land you a fully loaded Moto G Plus with 4GB of RAM and 64GB of memory. Both smartphones are solid entries in their price ranges despite the above shortcomings. However, despite it being the lesser sibling, we still think that the Moto G is the the one to go for. Buyers who don't care about a large display, on the other hand, should consider last year's
Vergelijking, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 29-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Tom's Guide
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionIf you wanted more bang for your 200 bucks, the fourth-generation Moto G certainly delivers an impressive display and solid performance for a low-cost phone. But budget-minded shoppers who also want a phone that can double as a camera may want to pony up the extra $50 for the Moto G4 Plus and its more powerful rear camera.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 22-07-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: GSM Arena
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionWith a Nexus line that only offers one or two new phones a year, we need more handsets running pure Android. And the Moto phones - the affordable Es, the well-rounded Gs and flagship Xs - were some of the best such phones. Of course, they were made by Google-owned Motorola! There were some doubts about the future of the company and its fate after the sale to Lenovo, but so far the Chinese tech giant has proven to be a great shepherd of the beloved Moto brand. Its wide distribution network is actually helping Moto phones reach more markets than before.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 01-07-2016
Bron: Techradar
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionThe design might not be to everyone's taste, but it's certainly not going to put many people off – and if you're after a phone on a budget you're probably not going to be overly fussy. Considering how good-looking the display is, and how impressive the performance is – and the battery life isn't too bad either – it's hard to see how anyone could be disappointed with the Moto G4.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 29-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 90%
Bron: V3.co.uk
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionNow in its fourth generation the new Moto G is just as essential as ever. But it has its work cut out if it wants to be heard above the cacophony of its competitors. Luckily Lenovo knows how to marry build quality with value, so the G4 retains some of the magic that accounts for its popularity year on year. Quite simply it's a joy to behold.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 29-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: It Pro
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionWe shouldn’t have doubted the Motorola team at Lenovo – the Moto G4 is outstanding value. Staggering battery life, a great screen as well smooth responsiveness and slick performance make for a great smartphone – pricier phones have been sold on less. If you want an excellent quality camera as well as a fingerprint reader and the fastest possible performance, then you’ll still need to look elsewhere.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 21-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100%
Bron: Stuff TV
 EN→NL Archive.org version
 EN→NL Archive.org versionWe’re even in two minds about whether you really need to upgrade to the Plus. The upgrade is definitely a bargain, but if you’re not bothered about a finger scanner, the camera is already good enough to serve up top-quality snaps. Either way, the Moto G4 is a phenomenally good phone that's going for a steal.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 07-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 100%
Bron: Inside Handy
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 23-11-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: Android Mag
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 22-08-2016
Bron: Inside Handy
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 05-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Inside Handy
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 24-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 70%
Bron: Android Pit
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 01-06-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Tech Stage
 DE→NL Archive.org version
 DE→NL Archive.org versionVergelijking, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 17-05-2016
Bron: Mi Mundo Gadget
 ES→NL Archive.org version
 ES→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 20-11-2016
Bron: Recensione.biz
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 01-03-2017
Beoordeling: Totale score: 42% beeldscherm: 52% mobiliteit: 80%
Bron: Tutto App Android
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 04-02-2017
Bron: Pianeta Cellulare
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 13-11-2016
Bron: Esperienza Mobile
 IT→NL Archive.org version
 IT→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 02-08-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 76% prijs: 80% prestatie: 70% beeldscherm: 75% mobiliteit: 85% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Top for Phone
 FR→NL Archive.org version
 FR→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 30-08-2016
Bron: 90 Sekund
 PL→NL Archive.org version
 PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer lang, Datum: 08-10-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 82% prestatie: 90% functionaliteiten: 90% mobiliteit: 100% afwerking: 70%
Bron: Tablety
 PL→NL Archive.org version
 PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 10-09-2016
Beoordeling: Totale score: 75%
Bron: Android.com.pl
 PL→NL Archive.org version
 PL→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 04-09-2016
Bron: Mobilizujeme
 CZ→NL Archive.org version
 CZ→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 28-08-2016
Bron: Computerblog.ro
 →NL Archive.org version
 →NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 26-09-2016
Commentaar
Qualcomm Adreno 405:
Alleen oudere games kunnen vloeiend draaien met deze grafische chips (als ze niet veeleisend zijn). Gedeeld geheugen grafische cores in deze categorie hebben het voordeel van minder warmte-ontwikkeling en langere batterijlooptijd. Voor kantoor, internet, beeldcorrectie- en videomonteringswerk zijn deze grafische chips nog steeds bruikbaar zonder enige beperkingen.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
617 MSM8952:
Mid-range ARM-SoC met 8 CPU-cores (Cortex-A53, 64-bit-capabel) en een Adreno 405-GPU. Gefabriceerd in een 28nm LP-proces).
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.