Asus VivoBook S400CA-UH51
Laptopspecificaties

Price comparison
Gemiddelde van 6 score (van 7 beoordelingen)
Testrapporten voor de Asus VivoBook S400CA-UH51
Bron: Techradar
EN→NL Archive.org versionWe are disappointed by a few aspects of the VivoBook S400C: notably the battery life and touchpad gestures, but the overwhelming sense is that the S400C is a very good laptop. It doesn't break the bank and doesn't provide unnecessary expensive hardware. The spec sheet features a decent level of equipment that runs Windows 8 smoothly and should provide you with the power you need. And it's a beautifully appointed laptop for the money. It looks almost like an Ultrabook as well; your friends just won't believe that it was only £500.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 20-01-2013
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: Computer Shopper
EN→NL Archive.org versionNo matter how you feel about Windows 8, it's hard to deny that the operating system is best experienced with a touch screen. The Asus VivoBook S400CA is not only tap- and gesture-ready, but it's the most affordable touch-screen laptop we've seen to date (mid-January 2013). That's not to say the S400CA is perfect, not with its pedestrian display and poor battery life.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 18-01-2013
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: PC Mag
EN→NL Archive.org versionCompared to other laptops, the Asus VivoBook S400CA-UH51 comes in with great bang for the buck due to its high-performance processor, large amount of storage, touch screen, and above all its sub $700 price. The VivoBook far outperforms ultrabooks priced at the $899 or above. While it doesn't have the battery life (or pricing) to unseat our budget laptop Editors' Choice, the Acer Aspire V5-571-6891, the VivoBook S400CA-UH51 certainly has the chops to become our new Editors' Choice for entry-level ultrabooks with touch screen. In the ultrabook category, it's worth noting that the mainstream EC costs almost $200 more, where you would expect more battery life to be part of the equation. At the entry level, the Asus simply gives users what they need for a better Windows 8 experience, at a fair price.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Zeer kort, Datum: 27-12-2012
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: IT Reviews
EN→NL Archive.org versionWith its touch screen, and reasonable price, the Asus VivoBook S400CA-UH51 is the ultrabook to cut your Windows 8 teeth on. The Asus VivoBook S400CA-UH51 is one of the least expensive ways to get a fully functional Windows 8 ultrabook. It's a touch-screen ultrabook that gets the pricing and feature set right.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Gemiddeld, Datum: 27-12-2012
Beoordeling: Totale score: 80%
Bron: CNet
EN→NL Archive.org versionWindows 8 may have one foot solidly planted in the future, but in the present it needs to be a reliable OS for everyday computers, too. You get a decent 14-inch laptop package in the Asus VivoBook, especially given that it has a touch screen, but it doesn't add up to anything particularly impressive that you can't get elsewhere either with better design or for a lower price.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 12-12-2012
Beoordeling: Totale score: 74% prestatie: 80% mobiliteit: 70%
Bron: Laptop Mag
EN→NL Archive.org versionThe $699 ASUS VivoBook S400CA-UH51 represents a pretty solid value for students, mainstream users and those who have been waiting to pull the trigger on their first Windows 8 machine. This is the lightest and thinnest Ultrabook we've seen that has a 14-inch touch screen. However, while five hours of battery life isn't terrible, other Windows 8 touch screen notebooks last longer on a charge. We also wish the keyboard had a firmer feel.
Enkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Lang, Datum: 04-12-2012
Beoordeling: Totale score: 60%
Bron: XT Mobile
VN→NL Archive.org versionEnkel testrapport, online beschikbaar, Kort, Datum: 05-12-2012
Commentaar
Intel HD Graphics 4000: Processor grafische kaart in high-end Ivy Bridge modellen. Biedt verschillende kloksnelheden voor verschillende CPU modellen (ULV tot desktop quad-core) en levert daardoor verschillende prestaties.
De meeste niet-veeleisende huidige games kunnen vloeiend draaien. Wees voorbereid op verminderde grafische weergave door lage detailinstellingen en lage resoluties. Toch verschaffen deze kaarten voldoende prestatie voor kantoor taken en video bekijken (niet voor HD videos).
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Grafische Kaarten en de passende Benchmark Tabel.
3317U: Ivy-Bridge ULV-CPU uit Q2 2012. Heeft een kloksnelheid van 1.7 - 2.6 GHz en een HD 4000 GPU (350 - 1050 MHz). Het TDP staat op 17 watt.
>> Meer informatie kan gevonden worden in ons Vergelijk van Mobiele Processors.



